Skip to main content
. 2023 May 26;9(6):e16675. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16675

Table 5.

Students: Negative (N) common (c) and particular (p) Elements.

Item Description Average Mention I.
sNcE_01 Issues when framing the instructor through the cameras 3.0 3/7
sNcE_02 Feeling of lack of inclusion when attending classes remotely 3.3 3/7
sNcE_03 Accessing recorded class sessions limited to a short period of time 1.0 2/7
sNcE_04 Technical failures of the system 2.5 2/7
sNpE_01 Not having the option of splitting the screen to have the view of 2 cameras 2.0 1/7
sNpE_02 Timetable (for people that are abroad in South America) 2.0 1/7
sNpE_03 Poor time distribution between the different seminars 4.0 1/7
sNpE_04 Difficulty in using the system 1.0 1/7
sNpE_05 Some instructors did not answer the e-mails 1.0 1/7
sNpE_06 Being online: when ‘raising the hand’, sometimes not being attended 4.0 1/7
sNpE_07 Some discrepancies between the syllabus and what was required in class 4.0 1/7
sNpE_08 Information on deliverables: it was only in ECT (European Central Time) 4.0 1/7

User Experience: Findings from the pocket BLA tool. Negative elements. Sorted by Mention Index.