Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;17:1157957. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1157957

Table 5.

Table showing a performance comparison between the top performing networks from each network type, evaluated on the test set, along with the best performing LSTM network from Pettersson and Falkman (2022).

Network Th L AP (%) AM (%) AVP (%) P T[ms]
Best networks from each architecture—Test set
Enc1 0.53 82.74 80.06 89.10 7.02k 31.43 ± 4.05
Enc2 0.63 79.12 65.77 87.73 5.79k 30.26 ± 3.89
Enc3 0.48 69.78 71.29 82.56 5.25k 29.96 ± 3.91
Mix1 0.43 79.09 70.51 86.90 6.77k 29.30 ± 3.89
Mix2 0.42 80.19 72.28 87.53 6.57k 29.37 ± 3.88
Mix3 0.25 76.97 77.86 87.61 4.99k 29.42 ± 3.88
LSTM 0.38 70.70 67.89 81.29 6.99k 30.39 ± 4.10

The bold values indicate the best (largest) and most interesting value for three accuracy metrics.