Table 5.
Table showing a performance comparison between the top performing networks from each network type, evaluated on the test set, along with the best performing LSTM network from Pettersson and Falkman (2022).
| Network | Th L | AP (%) | AM (%) | AVP (%) | P | T[ms] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best networks from each architecture—Test set | ||||||
| Enc1 | 0.53 | 82.74 | 80.06 | 89.10 | 7.02k | 31.43 ± 4.05 |
| Enc2 | 0.63 | 79.12 | 65.77 | 87.73 | 5.79k | 30.26 ± 3.89 |
| Enc3 | 0.48 | 69.78 | 71.29 | 82.56 | 5.25k | 29.96 ± 3.91 |
| Mix1 | 0.43 | 79.09 | 70.51 | 86.90 | 6.77k | 29.30 ± 3.89 |
| Mix2 | 0.42 | 80.19 | 72.28 | 87.53 | 6.57k | 29.37 ± 3.88 |
| Mix3 | 0.25 | 76.97 | 77.86 | 87.61 | 4.99k | 29.42 ± 3.88 |
| LSTM | 0.38 | 70.70 | 67.89 | 81.29 | 6.99k | 30.39 ± 4.10 |
The bold values indicate the best (largest) and most interesting value for three accuracy metrics.