. 2023 Mar 29;43(4):26. doi: 10.1007/s11032-023-01372-6

Table 4.

Putative QTLs detected for 100-seed weight in the QH3417 and XH1617 populations

Locus	QTL ^a	Chr	Position	Marker or interval ^b	LOD ^c	PVE(%) ^d	Add ^e
Locus_OSW_06	qOSW-34	06	6541348- 6611603	Gm06_6611603_A_G- Gm06_6541348_G_T	4.85	9.83	-0.95
qOSW-16	06	6187779- 6370390	Gm06_6187779_T_C- Gm06_6370390_G_A	4.09	7.05	-0.81

Locus

QTL ^a

Chr

Position

Marker or interval ^b

LOD ^c

PVE(%) ^d

Add ^e

Locus_OSW_06

qOSW-34

6541348-

6611603

Gm06_6611603_A_G-

Gm06_6541348_G_T

4.85

9.83

-0.95

qOSW-16

6187779-

6370390

Gm06_6187779_T_C-

Gm06_6370390_G_A

4.09

7.05

-0.81

^aqOSW-34 and qOSW-16, the QTLs detected for 100-seed weight in the QH3417 and XH1617 populations, respectively

^bMarker or interval, markers or support intervals on the linkage map in which the LOD is the largest

^cLOD, logarithm of odds

^dPVE (%), percentage of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL

^eAdd, additive effects, negative values represent increasing effects of the QTLs derived from HJ117