Skip to main content
. 2023 May 11;12(3):194–212. doi: 10.21037/acs-2022-avs1-14

Table 2. Lesions suitable for repair or replacement, based on valve and root anatomy and on analysis of the aortic regurgitation mechanisms by transesophageal echocardiography.

Consider repair Discussion with balancing of repair and replacement Consider replacement
Valve phenotype BAV: Type A and B UAV
TAV BAV: Type C
QAV
Root phenotype All phenotypes
AR severity All grades
Mechanism of AR Type Ia–d Type Id with large/multiple perforations Type Id due to active endocarditis
Type II Type II due to large/multiple fenestrations
Type III in young/congenital heart Type III
Quality of cusp tissue Flexible cusps, no SRCM SRCM due to body calcifications (Grade 2) Major tissue thickening
SRCM due to root dilatation Grade 3–4 calcifications
SRCM due to free margin thickening Active and destructive endocarditis
Grade 1–2 calcifications
Specific measurements TAV: gH >16 mm TAV: gH ≤16 mm
BAV: gH >19 mm (FC) BAV: gH ≤19 mm (FC)
Pre- and post-repair eH, cH, and CO must be compared

BAV, bicuspid aortic valve; TAV, tricuspid aortic valve; QAV, quadricuspid aortic valve; UAV, unicuspid aortic valve; AR, aortic regurgitation; SRCM, systolic restrictive cusp motion; FC, fused cusp; gH, geometric height; eH, effective height; cH, coaptation height; CO, commissural orientation.