Table 2. Lesions suitable for repair or replacement, based on valve and root anatomy and on analysis of the aortic regurgitation mechanisms by transesophageal echocardiography.
Consider repair | Discussion with balancing of repair and replacement | Consider replacement | |
---|---|---|---|
Valve phenotype | BAV: Type A and B | UAV | |
TAV | BAV: Type C | ||
QAV | |||
Root phenotype | All phenotypes | ||
AR severity | All grades | ||
Mechanism of AR | Type Ia–d | Type Id with large/multiple perforations | Type Id due to active endocarditis |
Type II | Type II due to large/multiple fenestrations | ||
Type III in young/congenital heart | Type III | ||
Quality of cusp tissue | Flexible cusps, no SRCM | SRCM due to body calcifications (Grade 2) | Major tissue thickening |
SRCM due to root dilatation | Grade 3–4 calcifications | ||
SRCM due to free margin thickening | Active and destructive endocarditis | ||
Grade 1–2 calcifications | |||
Specific measurements | TAV: gH >16 mm | TAV: gH ≤16 mm | |
BAV: gH >19 mm (FC) | BAV: gH ≤19 mm (FC) | ||
Pre- and post-repair eH, cH, and CO must be compared |
BAV, bicuspid aortic valve; TAV, tricuspid aortic valve; QAV, quadricuspid aortic valve; UAV, unicuspid aortic valve; AR, aortic regurgitation; SRCM, systolic restrictive cusp motion; FC, fused cusp; gH, geometric height; eH, effective height; cH, coaptation height; CO, commissural orientation.