Table 4.
Guidelines | Recommendation | Grade of recommendation and level of evidence |
---|---|---|
ACCP 2018 (117) | LAA occlusion has been suggested in AF patients at high risk of ischemic stroke who have absolute contraindications for OACs | Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence |
Taiwan heart rhythm society 2018 (118) | Percutaneous LAA closure may be considered in patients with very high stroke risk and contraindicated for long-term OACs | No grading |
Cardiac society of Australia and New Zealand 2018 (119) | LAA occlusion may be considered for stroke prevention in patients with N-VAF at moderate to high risk of stroke and with contraindication to oral anticoagulation therapy | Strong recommendation, weak quality of evidence |
AHA/ACC/HRS 2019 (120) | Percutaneous LAA occlusion may be considered in patients with AF at increased risk of stroke who have contraindications to long-term anticoagulation | COR: IIb, LOE: B |
CCS 2020 (121) | Percutaneous LAAO should be considered for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF who are at moderate to high risk of stroke and have an absolute contraindication to OACs | Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence |
ESC 2020 (82) | LAA occlusion may be considered in patients with AF and contraindications for long-term anticoagulant treatment (e.g intracranial bleeding without a reversible cause) | COR IIb, LOE B |
AF = atrial fibrillation; OACs = oral anticoagulation; LAA = left atrial appendix; LAAO = left atrial appendix occlusion; NVAF = non valvular atrial fibrillation; COR = class of recommendations; LOE = level of evidence.
Table 4 indication for left atrial appendix closure in the current guidelines.