Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 8;23:425. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04417-8

Table 3.

Effect sizes by each level of moderators and variance components

Moderator m r 95% CI p Q I2
EI task nature
 Ability-based 68 .11 [.074–.148]  < .001 276.38 75.76%
 Trait-based 38 .08 [.048–.127]  < .001 97.27 61.96%
EI test
 EQ-i 11 .14 [.076–.204]  < .001 20.74 51.79%
 MSCEIT 53 .10 [.053–.140]  < .001 210.26 75.27%
 SSEIT 6 .11 [-.053–.237] .109 .995  < 1%
 Other 36 .09 [.049–.124]  < .001 99.56 64.84%
EI subscale
 Facilitating emotions 8 .13 [.046–.215] .003 3.21  < 1%
 Perceiving emotions 7 .20 [.117–.286]  < .001 .605  < 1%
 Understanding emotions 8 .11 [.048–.167]  < .001 .356  < 1%
 Managing emotions 8 -.04 [-.238–.163] .713 107.20 93.47%
 Total score 54 .13 [.094–.166]  < .001 159.86 66.85%
 Other EI dimensions 21 .05 [-.005–.112] .071 76.79 73.96%
Academic performance
 GPA 37 .09 [.039–.141]  < .001 180.62 80.06%
 Examinations 69 .11 [.077–.141]  < .001 194.05 64.96%
Country
 US & Canada 48 .07 [.037–.113]  < .001 125.83 62.65%
 Other Countries 58 .12 [.085–.161]  < .001 231.06 75.33%
Variance component
 Level 2 = 33.5%
 Level 3 = 29.5%

EI emotional intelligence, EQ-i Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory [43], MSCEIT Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test [44], SSEIT The Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test [45], GPA grade point average; m = number of effect sizes; Level-2 = within-studies variance; Level-3 = within-studies variance