Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 8;15:107. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01254-1

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of studies regarding plasma/serum and CSF chemokines

Comparison Chemokine Sample No of study N Main effect Heterogeneity Publication bias
RoM (95% CI) P value I2 (%) P value p for Begg’s p for Egger’s
AD vs HC CCL1

Plasma/

serum

3 199/696 1.56 (1.02–2.39) 0.126# 92.3  < 0.001 1 0.51
CCL2 20 2017/1953 1.13 (0.92–1.39) 0.726# 98.7  < 0.001 0.02 0.06
CCL3 5 244/321 1.36 (0.80–2.30) 0.759# 99.1  < 0.001 1 0.72
CCL4 4 406/342 0.96 (0.82–1.12) 1.701# 37.9 0.148 0.31 0.09
CCL5 6 216/136 0.99 (0.62–1.60) 2.73# 97.8  < 0.001 1 0.57
CCL7 4 277/261 1.19 (0.83–1.72) 2.304# 87 0.349 1 0.76
CCL11 3 301/284 1.17 (0.83–1.64) 1.131# 67.3 0.047 1 0.80
CCL15 3 207/78 1.29 (1.13–1.47) 0.009# 48.7 0.142 0.09 0.06
CCL17 4 140/175 1.31 (0.88–1.96) 0.18 80 0.002 0.31 0.60
CCL18 2 238/193 1.05 (0.79–1.38) 0.753 62.9 0.101 - -
CCL19 2 43/50 1.71 (0.30–9.87) 0.55 91.2 0.001 - -
CCL22 2 111/59 1.04 (0.65–1.67) 0.864 72.7 0.056 - -
CCL26 3 174/701 0.81 (0.60–1.10) 0.346# 0 0.747 1 0.25
CCL27 3 58/87 1.34 (1.19–1.51)  < 0.001 0 0.368 0.30 0.55
CXCL1 4 92/108 1.28 (0.93–1.77) 0.126 55.1 0.083 0.31 0.41
CXCL8 18 727/580 1.18 (0.85–1.62) 0.966# 98  < 0.001 0.77a 0.21a
CXCL9 3 140/108 1.78 (1.39–2.28)  < 0.001 46.9 0.152 0.31 0.05
CXCL10 3 78/64 1.92 (1.03–3.58) 0.039 99.4  < 0.001 1 0.44
CXCL12 3 78/98 1.03 (0.85–1.24) 0.727 91  < 0.001 1 0.97
CX3CL1 4 148/131 1.20 (0.96–1.50) 0.33# 84.1  < 0.001 1 0.51
AD vs MCI CCL1 2 120/95 1.37 (1.17–1.59)  < 0.001 0 0.772 - -
CCL2 9 1026/573 1.13 (0.80–1.59) 1.095# 85.6  < 0.001 0.60 0.53
CCL3 2 56/81 1.00 (0.86–1.16) 2.982# 0 0.722 - -
CCL4 4 536/405 1.04 (0.95–1.14) 1.227# 0 0.704 0.31 0.11
CCL5 2 124/95 0.98 (0.77–1.25) 2.7# 52.5 0.147 - -
CCL7 2 106/69 1.21 (0.96–1.53) 0.3# 0 0.843 - -
CCL11 2 290/250 1.09 (0.96–1.24) 0.489# 32.1 0.225 - -
CCL15 2 188/111 1.09 (1.00–1.19) 0.135# 0 0.996 - -
CXCL8 6 271/302 1.13 (0.80–1.59) 1.497# 89.3  < 0.001 1 0.08
CXCL9 2 46/61 2.29 (1.57–3.32)  < 0.001 25.8 0.246 - -
CX3CL1 2 93/69 0.77 (0.62–0.96) 0.05# 0 0.938 - -
MCI vs HC CCL1 2 95/631 1.30 (0.66–2.54) 1.356# 90.6 0.001 - -
CCL2 13 655/665 1.07 (0.98–1.16) 0.369# 77.6  < 0.001 0.50 0.412
CCL3 2 95/31 0.64 (0.22–1.92) 1.827# 91 0.001 - -
CCL4 3 317/311 0.94 (0.83–1.07) 1.059# 1.8 0.361 1 0.51
CCL5 2 81/89 1.28 (0.50–3.23) 1.281# 79.7 0.027 - -
CCL7 2 69/38 0.94 (0.73–1.22) 1.971# 42.1 0.189 - -
CCL11 6 347/331 1.03 (0.97–1.1) 0.933# 0 0.824 1 0.49
CCL15 2 111/59 1.16 (1.01–1.35) 0.117# 0 0.654 - -
CCL26 2 82/107 1.27 (0.63–2.57) 1.768# 41 0.193 - -
CXCL8 7 340/194 1.05 (0.61–1.80) 2.589# 96.4  < 0.001 0.45a 0.79a
CXCL9 2 61/52 1.01 (0.76–1.34) 2.79# 0 0.324 - -
CX3CL1 2 69/77 2.02 (1.58–2.58)  < 0.001 19.2 0.266 - -
AD vs HC CCL2 CSF 12 310/338 1.19 (1.13–1.25)  < 0.001 0 0.81 0.84 0.73
CCL5 2 38/56 1.30 (0.66–2.57) 0.451 48.3 0.164 - -
CXCL8 10 260/308 1.22 (0.99–1.50) 0.174# 86.8  < 0.001 0.59 0.85
CXCL10 5 295/231 1.05 (0.84–1.31) 2.007# 68.8 0.012 0.46 0.60
CXCL12 2 42/47 0.95 (0.62–1.46) 0.803 83.8 0.013 - -
CX3CL1 4 133/207 1.09 (0.93–1.28) 0.933# 51.6 0.102 0.73 0.71
MCI vs HC CCL2 6 175/171 1.16 (1.05–1.29) 0.012# 59.2 0.031 0.26 0.39
CXCL8 3 65/85 1.52 (0.70–3.29) 0.585# 96.2  < 0.001 1 0.37
CXCL10 2 52/66 1.19 (0.48–2.97) 2.103# 92.6  < 0.001 - -
CX3CL1 3 72/70 1.27 (0.71–2.28) 1.266# 89.7  < 0.001 1 0.63
AD vs MCI CCL2 5 130/123 1.04 (0.90–1.19) 1.893# 56.3 0.058 1 0.33
CXCL8 3 61/65 0.72 (0.38–1.37) 0.96# 94.7  < 0.001 1 0.47
CXCL10 2 36/52 1.08 (0.56–2.08) 2.454# 76.2 0.04 - -
CX3CL1 3 83/72 0.80 (0.51–1.27) 1.044# 81.1 0.005 1 0.33

AD Alzheimer’s disease, MCI Mild cognitive impairment, HC Healthy control, CSF Cerebrospinal fluid, RoM Ratio of mean, CI Confident interval

a When removing the outlier (Kim et al.’s study)

#p value with Bonferroni corrected