TABLE 3.
Key areas highlighted by the gap analysis in which significant shortfalls in the Greek organ donation and transplantation program were identified.
| Framework domain | Key features | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Enabling Elements: Government: Political Support, Funding, and Long-Term Commitment | Funding | Lack of financial stability and long-term sustainability |
| Government commitment | Lack of strategic planning and continuity | |
| Enabling Elements: Government: Key Legislation | Diagnosis of brain death | Transplant legislation has defined brain death. This gives the false impression of conflicts of interest. There are no clear provisions regarding the performance of diagnostic tests or the role of ancillary testing |
| Modes of donation | Pediatric live donation (LD) is prohibited. There are no provisions for adult or pediatric controlled or uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (cDCD/uDCD), withdrawal of life-saving treatment (WLST), “no-touch” time, or directed or non-directed altruistic donation | |
| Consent policy | An opt-in consent system is in effect | |
| Enabling Elements: Building and Maintaining Public Support and Trust in the System | Creating public trust | There are high levels of public distrust in the system |
| Periodic surveys and educational campaigns for the general public | Public awareness of organ donation is limited | |
| Communication strategies | There are no targeted national communication strategies | |
| Structural Elements: National Transplant Organization | Leadership capacity | The National Transplant Organization (NTO) has no authority to enact reforms in the system |
| Organizational structure | The current organizational structure does not correspond with the responsibilities defined by national legislation | |
| Organizational resources | The program is short-staffed and under-resourced | |
| National and international responsibilities | The responsibilities defined by legislation follow international best practices. However, the organization’s national responsibilities are not met and few international collaborations have been established | |
| Structural Elements: Infrastructure | Workforce | The numbers of transplant surgeons, physicians, and anesthetists are below the European average |
| Facilities | There are five transplant centers in Greece. One new transplant center is currently under construction. The goal is to accommodate additional pediatric and adult transplant services. The capacity of the operative theaters and access to imaging, endoscopy, pathology, and histocompatibility services are below the European standard at all five of the existing transplant centers | |
| Structural Elements: Reimbursement of Staff and Facilities | Mechanisms of reimbursement | The KEN-DRG diagnosis-related group reimbursement system covers transplantation activities but not activities related to donation (e.g., maintenance of donors in the intensive care unit, organ retrieval, among other activities). There is no provision for reimbursement of organ donor coordinators for work specifically related to donation |
| Incentives | Donation activities represent a considerable financial burden to participating hospitals | |
| Structural Elements: Registries, Databases and Information Technology (IT) | Registries and waiting lists | There are no living donation (LD) registries |
| IT and data protection | Critical donor data are not easily accessed by the different parties involved due to the absence of a functional IT system | |
| Structural Elements: Quality Standards and Continual Quality Improvement | Maintaining quality standards | While quality standards for authorization and licensing of transplant units are clearly defined in national legislation, there is no evidence of regular inspection of transplant facilities, equipment, or personnel. There are no quality standards provided to guide donation, pre-transplant, or post-transplant care. A few quality indicators are monitored annually by the NTO. |
| Driving quality improvement | Although performance data comparing transplant centers are published every 3 years, there are no nationally agreed-upon procedures designed to facilitate improvement. No evidence of quality improvement interventions was found | |
| Operational Elements: Prevention | Primary prevention | There are no public health programs designed to prevent heart, lung, liver, and kidney disease |
| Secondary prevention | There are no screening programs targeting populations at high risk of developing heart, lung, liver, and/or kidney disease | |
| Operational Elements: Deceased Donation | Donation coordination | Although the qualifications, training, duties, and responsibilities of organ donation coordinators (ODCs) are defined by national legislation, there is no legislative provision for protected time to perform duties or any form of financial reimbursement. Most of the ODC posts in Greece remain unfilled |
| Donor evaluation and management | There are no nationally agreed-upon guidelines for the evaluation and management of deceased donors | |
| Organ retrieval, preservation, and transport | There are no nationally agreed-upon protocols for organ retrieval, preservation, or transport | |
| Operational Elements: Live Donation (LD) | Promoting LD | Although there are legislative provisions that address reimbursement of living donors for costs incurred, there are currently no policies that promote living donation |
| Assessment of living donors | There are no nationally agreed-upon guidelines for the evaluation and management of living donors | |
| Operational Elements: Transplantation | Referral and assessment for transplant | There are no nationally agreed-upon criteria or standardized processes to guide patient referrals and assessments for suitability for transplant. There are also no nationally agreed-upon criteria for listing decisions |
| Transplant coordination | Only seven transplant recipient coordinators, all of whom are all based at the NTO headquarters, are responsible for the coordination of all transplant procedures throughout the entire country. Because of staff shortages, this service is not available on all days or at all times | |
| Surgery and perioperative care | The lack of physical and human resources hinders timely access to operating theaters. There are no standardized national peri-operative care protocols | |
| Access to post-transplant care | Patients in transplant units are followed-up routinely by multidisciplinary transplant teams. Some patients need to travel long distances for routine check-ups. There is no provision for shared-care protocols nor any infrastructure to support telemedicine | |
| Operational Elements: Post-Transplant Follow-Up | National follow-up guidelines | National follow-up guidelines are lacking |
| National outcomes monitoring | While short-term (1 year) graft and patient survival rates are monitored by the NTO, mid-term and long-term outcomes are not monitored | |
| Training and Research: Research and Development | Research outputs | Minimal research is performed. Participation in international research efforts remains poor |
| Research facilities and funding | There are no official research funding bodies. Access to research facilities (e.g., experimental laboratories, experimental surgery facilities) remains limited | |
| Training and Research: Teaching, Training, and Professional Development | Continuous professional development for nurses and intensivists | Organ donation is not included as a core training module for intensivists or their support staff |
| Continuous professional development for organ donation coordinators | Although the NTO has developed a sophisticated curriculum for training coordinators in cooperation with the Transplant Procurement Management-Donation and Transplantation Institute (TPM-DTI), this program is no longer operational | |
| Continuous professional development for physicians and transplant surgeons | There are no dedicated training programs for transplant surgeons or physicians | |
| Professional Organizations and Scientific Societies | Engagement | Professional organizations and scientific societies are not involved in the development of national transplantation policy |