Table 3.
Summary of ureteral reimplantation primary outcomes
| Author (s) | Year published | Number of patients (total) | Number of robotic patients | Number of open patients | Number of laparoscopic patients | Type of study | Operation time (robotic) | Operation time (open) | Operation time (laparoscopic) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ureteral reimplantation | ||||||||||
| Peters and Woo | 2004 | 6 | 6 | - | - | Retrospective | - | - | - | |
| Smith et al. | 2011 | 50 | 25 | 25 | - | Retrospective | 185 min (117–286) | 165 min (116–209) | - | |
| Marchini et al. | 2011 | 78 | 39 | 39 | - | Retrospective | 232.6 min (±37.4) (intravesical); 233.5 min (±60.2) (extravesical) | 147.5 min (±34.3) (intravesical); 120.0 min (±47.5) (extravesical) | - | |
| Schomburg et al. | 2014 | 40 | 20 | 20 | - | Retrospective | 165 min (unilateral), 227 min (bilateral) | 109 min (unilateral), 134.5 min (bilateral) | - | |
| Gundeti et al. | 2016 | 58 | 58 | - | - | Retrospective | - | - | - | |
| Boysen and Gundeti | 2017 | 260 | 260 | - | - | Retrospective | 177 min (±61.4) | - | - | |
| Boysen and Gundeti | 2018 | 143 | 143 | - | - | Prospective | 194 min (±62) | - | - | |
| Esposito et al. | 2021 | 1362 | 1362 | - | - | Retrospective | 175.4 min (92.2–291) (unilateral), 195.2 min (108–285) (bilateral) | - | - | |
| Neheman et al. | 2019 | 27 | 27 | - | - | Retrospective | 180 min (median) (130–321) | - | - | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Author (s) | LOS (robotic) | LOS (open) | LOS (laparoscopic) | Success rate (robotic) (%) | Success rate (open) (%) | Success rate (laparoscopic) | Postoperative complication rate (robotic) (%) | Postoperative complication rate (open) (%) | Postoperative complication rate (laparoscopic) | Follow-up time |
|
| ||||||||||
| Ureteral reimplantation | ||||||||||
| Peters and Woo | 2–4 days | - | - | 83 | - | - | 17 | - | - | - |
| Smith et al. | 33 h (14–57) | 51 h (28–100) | - | 97 | 100 | - | - | - | - | 16 months (RALUR); 29.1 months (open) |
| Marchini et al. | 1.8 days (±1.2) (intravesical); 1.7 days (±1.0) (extravesical) | 2.9 days (±1.0) (intravesical); 1.7 days (±1.0) (extravesical) | - | No difference (data not shown) | No difference (data not shown) | - | 10 (intravesical); 6 (extravesical) | 14 (intravesical); 8 (extravesical) | - | 19.4 months robotic/12.1 months open (intravesical); 12 months robotic/12.8 months open (extravesical) |
| Schomburg et al. | 1.05 days | 1.4 days | - | 100 | 95 | - | 10 | 10 | - | 39 months (robotic); 52 months (open) |
| Gundeti et al. | 2 days (1–6) | - | - | 82 | - | - | 0 | - | - | 30 months |
| Boysen and Gundeti | 1.6 days (±1.1) | - | - | 87.90 | - | - | 9.60 | - | - | - |
| Boysen and Gundeti | 1.5 days (±1.0) | - | - | 93.80 | - | - | 7.10 | - | - | 7.4 months |
| Esposito et al. | 1.9 days (0.9–7.4) | - | - | 92 | - | - | 10.70 | - | - | 19.3 months |
| Neheman et al. | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | - | - | - |
Mean outcomes are shown unless otherwise listed. RALUR=Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation, LOS=Length of stay