Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 10;48(13):E203–E215. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004674

TABLE 3.

Meta-regression Analysis for the Incidence of HO

Meta-regression coefficient 95% CI P
Overall HO
 Year of publication −0.06 −0.19 to 0.07 0.301
 Age 0.02 −0.02 to 0.06 0.218
 Male sex −0.19 −2.32 to 1.95 0.845
 Design (retrospective vs. prospective) −0.07 −0.42 to 0.27 0.645
 Prosthesis type
  Prestige LP vs. others −0.13 −0.54 to 0.27 0.470
  Prodisc-C vs. others 0.27 −0.07 to 0.61 0.106
  Bryan vs. others −0.14 −0.52 to 0.24 0.431
 Funding source 0.137 −0.29 to 0.56 0.487
 CDR at C5/6 −0.78 −2.33 to 0.77 0.264
 ROM-pre 0.017 −0.14 to 0.18 0.788
 ROM 10-year −0.05 −0.39 to 0.29 0.706
 ASD −0.34 −2.03 to 1.34 0.634
Severe HO
 Year of publication −0.27 −0.47 to −0.06 0.015 *
 Age 0.01 −0.10 to 0.11 0.906
 Male sex −0.38 −4.89 to 4.13 0.853
 Design (retrospective vs. prospective) −0.24 −0.92 to 0.45 0.460
 Prosthesis type
  Prestige LP vs. others −0.03 −0.89 to 0.82 0.930
  Prodisc-C vs. others 0.37 −0.46 to 1.17 0.347
  Bryan vs. others −0.33 −1.09 to 0.42 0.346
  Mobi-C vs. others 0.15 −1.17 to 1.46 0.805
 Funding source 0.10 −0.70 to 0.90 0.787
 CDR at C5/6 −0.58 −4.10 to 2.93 0.698
 ROM-pre −0.11 −0.60 to 0.37 0.567
 ROM 10 yr −0.31 −0.70 to 0.07 0.091
 ASD −0.80 −3.43 to 1.82 0.492
*

P-value<0.05.

ASD indicates adjacent segment degeneration; CDR, cervical disk replacement; HO, heterotopic ossification; ROM, range of motion.