Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;11:1103393. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1103393

Table 2.

The association between metabolic health-obesity phenotypes (defined by %BF) and kidney stones.

Metabolic health-obesity phenotypes Events Participants Model 1 OR (95% CI) Model 2 OR (95% CI) Model 3§ OR (95% CI)
Metabolically healthy participants
MHN 12 445 Reference Reference Reference
MHOW 22 412 1.62 (0.56–4.65) 1.56 (0.53–4.59) 1.51 (0.51–4.53)
MHO 18 277 2.90 (1.18–7.08) 2.98 (1.20–7.42) 2.92 (1.15–7.42)
Per 5% increment in %BF 1.33 (1.07–1.66) 1.56 (1.17–2.07) 1.60 (1.20–2.14)
P for trend 0.026 0.026 0.023
Metabolically unhealthy participants
MUN 25 399 2.26 (0.94–5.44) 2.08 (0.83–5.23) 1.99 (0.77–5.14)
MUOW 95 1,023 3.27 (1.49–7.17) 2.91 (1.26–6.72) 2.78 (1.19–6.50)
MUO 186 1731 3.82 (1.79–8.14) 3.62 (1.64–7.97) 3.44 (1.55–7.63)
Per 5% increment in %BF 1.16 (1.08–1.26) 1.19 (1.02–1.39) 1.17 (1.00–1.37)
P for trend 0.008 0.005 0.007

%BF, percent body fat; MHN, metabolically healthy normal weight; MHOW, metabolically healthy overweight; MHO, metabolically healthy obesity; MUN, metabolically unhealthy normal weight; MUOW, metabolically unhealthy overweight; MUO, metabolically unhealthy obesity; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Model 1 was not adjusted. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, and race and ethics. §Model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, race and ethics, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, daily water intake, CKD stage 3–5, and hyperuricemia.