Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;14:1128291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1128291

Table 2.

Comparison of help-seeking (HS) versus non help-seeking (NHS) gamblers (SOGS-R ≥ 1).

HS n = 23 NHS n = 150 p-Value
Sex .266
Male 60.9% (14) 74.5% (111)
Age .961
18–25 26.1% (6) 22.3% (33)
26–45 60.9% (14) 61.5% (91)
46–65 13.0% (3) 14.9% (22)
66 and above 0.0% (0) 1.4% (2)
Excluded <.001*
Yes 60.9% (14) 21.3% (32)
No 39.1% (9) 78.7% (118)
SOGS-R .004 *
Some problem (1–4) 52.2% (12) 81.3% (122)
Prob. Path. Gamb. ≥5 47.8% (11) 18.7% (28)
Debts due to gambling .006 *
Yes 28.6% (6) 6.4% (9)
Made aware of treatment by a casino staff member .961
Yes 13.0% (3) 6.8% (10)
Gambling problem recognized by others .068
Yes 47.8% (11) 26.7% (40)
Own recognition of gambling problems .010 *
Yes 60.9% (14) 32.0% (48)
Gambling
Land based casino 47.8% (11) 80.7% (121) .001 *
Licensed online games 34.8% (8) 36.0% (54) 1
Online Swiss Lotto/Sports betting 0.0% (0) 20.7% (31) .961
Land-based Lotto/Sports betting 34.8% (8) 35.3% (53) 1
International online games 34.8% (8) 30.7% (46) .877
Others 17.4% (4) 31.3% (47) .263

All tests were performed with a chi-square test except when the conditions were not met. In this case, Fisher’s exact test was used.

*

p < .050.