Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;4:109–115. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3280127

TABLE III. Comparative Analysis and Benchmark.

Method Ground Truth Segmentation DistanceInline graphic ICCInline graphic bias (cm) LOA (cm)
SoTAInline graphic (Bilateral) MMC [21] OMC Auto AnyInline graphic 0.68 0.15 [-2.60, 2.90]
MyJump2 [9] Force Plate Manual 1 metre 0.96 -0.48 [-2.18, 2.08]
Ours (Unilateral) MMCInline graphic OMC Auto Any 0.91 1.99 [-0.16, 4.10]
MMCInline graphic OMC Auto Any 0.86 1.96 [-2.10, 6.00]
MMCInline graphic Force Plate Auto Any 0.84 -1.54 [-6.20, 3.20]
MMCInline graphic Force Plate Auto Any 0.88 -1.57 [-5.40, 2.20]
Ours (Bilateral) MMCInline graphic OMC Auto Any 0.99 1.47 [-0.41, 3.30]
MMCInline graphic OMC Auto Any 0.97 1.07 [-3.70, 5.90]
MMCInline graphic Force Plate Auto Any 0.95 -1.59 [-7.00, 3.80]
MMCInline graphic Force Plate Auto Any 0.93 -1.99 [-7.40, 3.50]
Ours (BL and UL) MMCInline graphic OMC Auto Any 0.98 1.66 [-0.39, 3.70]
MMCInline graphic OMC Auto Any 0.96 -1.41 [-3.20, 6.00]
MMCInline graphic Force Plate Auto Any 0.95 -1.57 [-6.70, 3.60]
MMCInline graphic Force Plate Auto Any 0.95 -1.83 [-6.70, 3.10]

Inline graphicDistance of the participant to the camera. Inline graphicState of the art as reported in the respective works. Inline graphicAny distance, as long as the participant is fully visible in the camera view. BL: bilateral; UL: unilateral; RMM: reverse minmax; PTM: pixel-to-metric. Best value for each metric is shown in bold font face.