Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 May 26;17(5):e0011320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011320

Onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy in Maridi, South Sudan: Modelling and exploring the impact of control measures against river blindness

Samit Bhattacharyya 1,2,*, Natalie V S Vinkeles Melchers 3, Joseph N Siewe Fodjo 2, Amit Vutha 4, Luc E Coffeng 3, Makoy Y Logora 5, Robert Colebunders 2, Wilma A Stolk 3
Editor: Marc P Hubner6
PMCID: PMC10249816  PMID: 37235598

Abstract

Background

Onchocerciasis, also known as “river blindness”, is caused by the bite of infected female blackflies (genus Simuliidae) that transmit the parasite Onchocerca volvulus. A high onchocerciasis microfarial load increases the risk to develop epilepsy in children between the ages of 3 and 18 years. In resource-limited settings in Africa where onchocerciasis has been poorly controlled, high numbers of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy (OAE) are reported. We use mathematical modeling to predict the impact of onchocerciasis control strategies on the incidence and prevalence of OAE.

Methodology

We developed an OAE model within the well-established mathematical modelling framework ONCHOSIM. Using Latin-Hypercube Sampling (LHS), and grid search technique, we quantified transmission and disease parameters using OAE data from Maridi County, an onchocerciasis endemic area, in southern Republic of South Sudan. Using ONCHOSIM, we predicted the impact of ivermectin mass drug administration (MDA) and vector control on the epidemiology of OAE in Maridi.

Principal findings

The model estimated an OAE prevalence of 4.1% in Maridi County, close to the 3.7% OAE prevalence reported in field studies. The OAE incidence is expected to rapidly decrease by >50% within the first five years of implementing annual MDA with good coverage (≥70%). With vector control at a high efficacy level (around 80% reduction of blackfly biting rates) as the sole strategy, the reduction is slower, requiring about 10 years to halve the OAE incidence. Increasing the efficacy levels of vector control, and implementing vector control simultaneously with MDA, yielded better results in preventing new cases of OAE.

Conclusions/Significances

Our modeling study demonstrates that intensifying onchocerciasis eradication efforts could substantially reduce OAE incidence and prevalence in endemic foci. Our model may be useful for optimizing OAE control strategies.

Author summary

Onchocerciasis is a parasitic disease caused by the filarial worm Onchocerca volvulus, which is transmitted by Simuliidae black flies. This disease is most common in Africa and South America. Onchocerca volvulus is thought to infect approximately 35 million Africans these days. Adult female worms infect people and form subcutaneous nodules, releasing thousands of microfilariae per day, causing itching, dermatitis, blindness, and epilepsy. Despite the fact that the association between onchocerciasis and epilepsy was already mentioned in a study from Mexico in 1938, this association was only reported around 1991 in Africa in the Mbam valley in Cameroon. Onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy (OAE) is characterised by seizures that start between the ages of 3 and 18 years in previously healthy children with a high degree of O. volvulus infection. Raising awareness about OAE will increase adherence to community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI), particularly in high-prevalence areas, while also motivating funders and stakeholders to keep fighting onchocerciasis. Here, we create an OAE model within the framework of ONCHOSIM that is parametrized using South Sudan data and investigate how different control measures such as CDTI and vector control might help reduce OAE in the future.

Introduction

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder with important psychosocial and economic consequences. Around 50 million people worldwide are estimated to have epilepsy and nearly 80% of them live in low- and middle-income countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [1]. The median prevalence of epilepsy in SSA is 1.4%, almost doubling the global epilepsy prevalence estimated at 0.76% [2,3]. Risk factors for developing epilepsy include complications during birth, traumatic brain injury, cerebral vascular disease, brain tumors, and infections of the central nervous system (CNS) [3]. In SSA, parasitic infections, such as cerebral malaria and neurocysticercosis, are additional causes of epilepsy [4,5].

There is increasing evidence suggesting that onchocerciasis, besides its well-known skin and ocular manifestations [6,7], may also cause epilepsy by a yet to be identified mechanism [8]. Onchocerciasis, also known as river blindness, is a parasitic disease caused by the filarial worm Onchocerca volvulus transmitted by blackflies of the genus Simuliidae [6,9]. Although the infection exists in some regions of Latin America and Yemen, more than 99% of infected people live in Africa [10]. A high prevalence of epilepsy has been observed in several onchocerciasis-endemic regions of SSA such as in South Sudan [11,12], Cameroon [13], and Tanzania [14]. Nodding syndrome, a particularly devastating form of epilepsy characterized by nodding seizures and stunting, is likely also associated with onchocerciasis [15].

Many epidemiological studies have documented an association between onchocerciasis and epilepsy. Pion et al. [16] assessed the relationship between the prevalence of onchocerciasis and epilepsy using available population-level data from different countries in SSA. They calculated that epilepsy prevalence increases by 0.4% for each 10% increase in onchocerciasis prevalence. The studies by Chesnais et al [17,18] showed that the risk to develop epilepsy increases with higher O. volvulus microfilariae (mf) intensities. They thus found a dose-response relationship between mf density and epilepsy risk in onchocerciasis-infected children, suggesting that epilepsy in this population is directly or indirectly caused by O. volvulus infection.

Large-scale interventions programs are ongoing in endemic countries to control and eliminate onchocerciasis. Ivermectin mass drug administration (MDA) is the main approach to quell onchocerciasis in endemic foci [19,20], sometimes in combination with localized vector control. Several studies have shown that interventions against onchocerciasis can lead to a reduction in the incidence of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy (OAE) [21,22]. Community-based studies conducted in 2017 in a highly affected area in Northern Uganda found that, compared to baseline findings in 2012, the incidence of nodding syndrome (OAE with head nodding seizures) and other forms of epilepsy drastically declined from 1,165 to 130 per 100,000 persons (P = 0.002) in an area with intensive interventions (annual MDA since 2009, biannual MDA since 2013, ground-based larviciding since 2012). Similarly, no new cases of OAE have appeared in the Kabarole district of Western Uganda after onchocerciasis was eliminated from the area [23].

Despite the overall success of onchocerciasis control and elimination programs, there are still many onchocerciasis-endemic regions with high ongoing O. volvulus transmission and most likely high OAE disease burden. It was estimated that by the year 2015, about 381,000 persons (95% CI: 159,000–1,636,000) were suffering from OAE across onchocerciasis-endemic areas in central and eastern Africa [24]. In the Maridi County in South Sudan (located on the border with DRC), where skin snip studies among randomly selected adults without epilepsy revealed an onchocerciasis prevalence of 50% [15], a recent survey found an overall epilepsy prevalence of 4.4% and an annual incidence of 374 per 100,000 persons [12]. Individuals between 11 to 20 years old were most affected (age-specific prevalence of 10.5%). The epilepsy prevalence was also highest in the villages close to the Maridi dam, a blackfly-breeding site. This dam, constructed in 1954–55 and repaired in 2000, may explain why an increasing number of children in Maridi have been developing OAE since the early 2000s [25].

Mathematical modelling has been used, among others, to assess prospects for eliminating onchocerciasis by annual ivermectin MDA or alternative strategies [2628] and has also been used to study likely trends in morbidity following the introduction of MDA [29,30]. So far, modelling has not yet been used to predict the impact of onchocerciasis elimination efforts on the incidence and prevalence of OAE. In the current paper, we used the modelling framework ONCHOSIM (a mathematical model for simulation of onchocerciasis transmission and control [31,32]) to investigate the impact of control interventions on the incidence and prevalence of OAE.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Age of onset of epilepsy in A) onchocerciasis-endemic villages: Mbam (Cameroon), Ituri (Democratic Republic of Congo), Mahenge (Tanzania), and B) onchocerciasis non-endemic villages: Kilifi (Kenia), Agincourt (South Africa) as previously reported by [8].

Methods

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Ministry of Health of South Sudan (January 2018, MOH/ERB 3/2018) and the University of Antwerp, Belgium (April 2019, B300201940004). Signed or finger-printed informed consent was obtained from all participants, parents or Care Givers, and assent was also obtained from adolescents (aged 12–18 years). All personal information was encoded and treated confidentially.

Onchocerciasis and epilepsy data used for modelling

We used age-specific OAE prevalence data collected from villages in the Maridi County (Western Equatoria State, South Sudan) [12,37] for parameter estimation of the model. This area is known to be endemic for onchocerciasis and the pre-control nodule prevalence was estimated at about 30–40% in the late 1990s [42], corresponding to a meso-endemic status. However in view of the high mf and OV16 prevalence as well as high biting rates observed at Maridi in 2018 and 2019 [15,25] (details below), we surmise that there has been an increase in onchocerciasis transmission since the 1990s. Consequently, in this modelling paper we consider this focus as being currently hyper-endemic.

MDA was initiated in Maridi County in 1997, but it was not conducted every year due to intermittent violent conflicts [43], with only six rounds having taken place between 1997 and 2013 [44]. Regular ivermectin MDA was only resumed in 2017, when 40.8% of the population reported to have taken the drug [12]. In May 2018, a door-to-door survey was carried out in this area to identify people with epilepsy. A total of 2,511 households (n = 17,652 participants) were surveyed and 774 persons (4.4%) persons with epilepsy were identified [12]. About 85% of the examined persons with epilepsy fulfilled the OAE criteria [37], suggesting an OAE prevalence of 3.7%. Only persons with epilepsy meeting the OAE criteria [38] were counted as “cases” in the model presented in this paper. In December 2018, the mf prevalence in Maridi was 50% among 50 non-epileptic adults tested and 85% among 270 persons with epilepsy tested [15]. In November 2019, biting rates up to 202 flies/man/hour were noted close to the Maridi dam and an onchocerciasis seroprevalence of 66.7% was documented using the OV16 rapid test among children 7–9 years old [25]. These figures suggest that currently, there is high ongoing onchocerciasis transmission in the Maridi area. It is very unlikely that neurocysticercosis could be an etiology for epilepsy in these villages, as there are no pigs in Maridi (for cultural reasons) [12].

ONCHOSIM model

ONCHOSIM is a well-established stochastic mathematical model that is implemented in WORMSIM, a generic individual-based helminth modelling framework [26,32,45]. We used version 2.78 of the WORMSIM program, which incorporates an elaborate morbidity sub-model that allows for the simulation of a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations due to O. volvulus infection [29,30]. A mathematical description of this module and the specific details of the disease parameters and processes of disease development can be found elsewhere [30].

Model assumptions

We assume that brain damage is (directly or indirectly) induced by immune responses triggered by O. volvulus mf, and that the accumulated amount of brain tissue damage in individual i at time t, Di(t), is given by:

Di(t)=Di(t1)+Sidi(t)

where Si is the susceptibility index of an individual i for developing brain tissue damage, and di is the number of mf that die in individual i in month t. The damage is assumed to be irreversible. When Di(t) exceeds a threshold, a person is assumed to acquire OAE, which is irreversible. As the age of onset of epilepsy between three and 18 years is characteristic of OAE (Box 1), we introduced a new parameter in the disease sub-model, amax, to define a maximum age for mf accumulation beyond which onset of OAE is no longer possible. However, the age of onset of OAE is not exactly known. For this paper, we fixed it at 18 years, varying it in a sensitivity analysis. Each individual was assigned a random, susceptibility index Si in [0, ∞), drawn from a gamma distribution with mean one (i.e., shape = rate in gamma distribution). Depending on their susceptibility index, some individuals may develop epilepsy very early in life compared to others who may not at all develop epilepsy in their lifetime at a given O. volvulus mf load.

Box 1: OAE age patterns

Population-based epilepsy surveys in onchocerciasis-endemic regions, including in the Maridi area, show that a large number of individuals develop epilepsy between the ages of three and 18 years, with a peak age of onset around 10 years [3337] (Fig 1A). This age range of onset of epilepsy is one of the main criteria of the definition of OAE [38]. In non-onchocerciasis endemic areas in Africa, epilepsy incidence usually peaks before the age of 5 years due to perinatal causes or epilepsy of genetic origin [4,8] (Fig 1B). Nodding syndrome is a more severe form of OAE with an earlier onset of seizures around the age of eight years, while for other forms of OAE, this is generally around the age of 11–12 [15,34]. Persons with nodding syndrome also have higher mf densities than those with other forms of OAE [15]. Nodding syndrome onset after the age of 20 years has so far not yet been reported. The reason for this peak onset around 10 years may be the sharp increase of mf load in O. volvulus infected children prior to this age [39] and also an increased susceptibility of the brain around this age to develop epilepsy, as in juvenile epilepsy [40]. The actual pathophysiological mechanism of OAE is still under investigation [8,41].

It has also been observed that there is a relatively high mortality rate of persons with epilepsy in onchocerciasis-endemic areas compared to the general population [12,37,46]. In fact, most people with epilepsy in South Sudan die before the age of 20 years and none of the identified cases were older than 35 years [12]. This is captured by assuming excess mortality in OEA patients, modelled as a reduction in a person’s residual life expectancy after developing OAE. The relative reduction per individual is randomly sampled from a uniform distribution.

Parameter quantification

We fixed most demographic and biological parameters related to fly and worm at their default value, as used in previous work, but we simulated a much larger population size to obtain more reliable output on the incidence of OAE by age (see Section A in S1 Text, and supplementary text S1 of [30]). Next, we quantified parameters in ONCHOSIM related to local transmission conditions and individuals’ exposure to blackflies, which largely determine the modelled equilibrium endemicity level. We fixed parameters related to age-sex and random variation in exposure to fly bites to the default values that were used previously [30]: exposure to blackfly bites is zero at birth, increases linearly with age until age 20, and remains stable at this maximum level at higher ages. The mean number of bites in women was assumed to be 70% of the number of bites in men in all ages. Random, age-sex independent variation in exposure to fly bites between individuals is described by a gamma distribution with mean 1.0 and variation 1/k, with k (shape and rate) equal to 4.283 similar to previous simulation exercises with ONCHOSIM for hyperendemic areas. Only the Annual Biting Rate (ABR) was tuned to have the model mimic the pre-control mf prevalence that was observed in Maridi, by adjusting the relative biting rate (rbr) that is multiplied with a series of monthly biting rates (for January to December) to obtain the ABR in the simulated population. As previously mentioned, we consider Maridi as a hyperendemic focus considering our recent study findings in the Maridi villages [15,25]. Accordingly, we calibrated the rbr in the model (that represents a pre-control equilibrium situation) such that with a larger number of model-runs, our model could adequately reproduce a mean mf prevalence that fits within the range that describes onchocerciasis hyperendemicity as observed in the Maridi area.

We fitted model-generated age-specific OAE prevalence to the age-specific OAE prevalence data from Maridi, to estimate three parameters of the model, i.e. (i) the disease threshold (T), (ii) shape parameter of the gamma distribution describing inter-individual variation in susceptibility for OAE (Si), and (iii) the mean life expectancy reduction (LER) experienced by people developing OAE. In estimating the parameter LER, we estimated Minimum LER, and calculated the maximum LER by considering Maximum LER = Minimum LER+10, and then determined the mean.

We used orthogonal sampling (Latin Hypercube sampling [LHS]) technique in 3D-parameter space and minimized the least square statistic obtained from data and the model output. Starting from wide range of each of the parameters, we sampled 100 points in three-dimensional parameter space using LHS, and then calculated the sum of squared errors (SSE) of age-specific OAE prevalence obtained from the model and South Sudan data. We considered the parameter combination which produced smallest SSE out of all these 100 samples. Thereafter, we took small neighborhoods around these parameter values and repeated the LHS to estimate the SSE. To reduce the impact of stochastic variability, we performed 100 runs for each set of parameter values and fitted the average model-predicted age-specific OAE prevalence to the data. We continued this execution of sampling and running the simulation iteratively multiple times until we observed no significant changes in the SSE. We could then obtain the parameter combination as their final estimated values explaining the South Sudan data. A supplementary figure has been given how SSE values depends on the values of three parameters (Fig A in S1 Text).

To validate the fitting exercise, we plot model-predicted OAE prevalence as a function of total mf prevalence. We simulated the model (with estimated parameters) for different values of monthly biting rate by varying the ABR from 6,170 to 30,850, and then calculate the OAE prevalence to plot against the MF prevalence (see results).

Sensitivity analysis

We performed univariate sensitivity analysis to test the sensitivity of parameter estimation exercise to assumptions on: (i) amax, the parameter describing maximum age of mf accumulation to develop epilepsy; (ii) inter-individual variation in susceptibility to develop OAE, (iii) reduction in life expectancy of epileptic individuals, and (iv) ABR. We used the same LHS technique to draw 100 samples from a wide range of the respective parameter around the best fitted values. For example, amax is sampled from 15–20, the shape parameter sampled from 0.075 to 0.2, the reduction in mean residual life expectancy parameter varies from 60%-80% [35], and the ABR from [20,000; 40,000].

Predicting trends in morbidity with onchocerciasis control

Scenario analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of annual and biannual ivermectin MDA on OAE incidence and prevalence over time, varying the MDA duration from 10–20 years and coverage between 50% and 70%. Of note, the denominator used for the calculation of MDA coverage was the entire population (all ages included). In addition to MDA, we also ran simulations for the implementation of vector control for 20 years with varying effectiveness (percentage reduction of blackfly biting rates) as standalone strategy or in combination with MDA. For each scenario, we computed the mean predicted OAE incidence out of 100 repeated stochastic simulation runs to avoid stochastic variability. We further perform multivariate analysis to assess the sensitivity of model-predicted trends in OAE incidence to changes in values for the OAE model parameters. We used same Latin Hypercube sampling [LHS] technique in 3D-parameter space considering feasible range of the estimated values of the three parameters: (i) inter-individual variation in susceptibility to develop OAE [0.075–0.2], (ii) reduction in life expectancy of epileptic individuals [60%-80%], and (iii) the Mf threshold [600–800]. We draw 100 samples from the above range of the respective parameters, and run the model under different MDA coverage, and vector control.

Good modelling practice

Our adherence to the five principles of the NTD Modelling Consortium on good practice for policy-relevant modelling is described in S1 Table.

Results

Parameter estimation

The pre-control model of OAE fits well to the age-specific pattern of the South Sudan OAE prevalence as observed in Fig 2. The rbr was estimated at 0.91, resulting in an ABR of 0.91 * 30,850 = 28,074 and a mean mf-prevalence of around 78.4% in the entire population. The morbidity parameter values were estimated as follows: mf threshold count (T) = 721, susceptibility heterogeneity parameter (Si) = 0.137, and mean reduction of life expectancy = 77%. With these estimated parameters, the model captured the non-linearity in the age distribution and the 10–20 years age group for the peak disease prevalence. The observed OAE prevalence in Maridi was 3.7%, which also showed a strong agreement with model predicted prevalence of 4.07%. Fig 2B shows the prevalence of new OAE onset in the respective age groups. Beyond the 10–20 years of age group, there is no onset of OAE, as observed in the data. For comparative analysis, we also plot the model predictions with the set of parameter values of second and third best fits (see Fig B in S1 Text).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

(a) Best model fit to the OAE prevalence as observed in 44 villages in 8 study sites in Maridi County in South Sudan in 2018, and (b) new OAE onset obtained from the model in parameter estimation. The black dots represent the mean of 100 runs.

With estimated values of fitted parameters, we plotted OAE prevalence against total mf prevalence. Fig 3 represents a comparison between our model output (prevalence of OAE only) and results predicted by Pion et al (corrected prevalence of all epilepsies; see Fig 3 in [16]). It shows a very low OAE prevalence (0–2%) when onchocerciasis prevalence remains under 60%, and thereafter the graph exhibits a steeper association. At lower onchocerciasis prevalence levels, the model predicted OAE prevalence is below the overall, which is expected as the model does not capture epilepsy from other causes. At higher onchocerciasis prevalence, the model predicts a steeper rise in OAE prevalence than shown in the survey data (especially from Cameroon), although the predicted level remains well within the range of observed values.

Fig 3. Model predicted OAE prevalence as a function of total mf prevalence compared with the original survey data obtained from Pion et al. [16].

Fig 3

Sensitivity analysis

We assessed the impact of parameters on fitting model to the data through sensitivity analysis (Fig C in S1 Text). We considered the age of maximum mf accumulation amax at 18 years in estimation of parameters. However, the prevalence peak shifts to the right if we consider the amax lies in between 15–20 years (Fig C(a) in S1 Text). Changing the susceptibility parameter or ABR did not change the basic pattern of OAE prevalence produced by the model (Fig C (b & d) in S1 Text), but higher values of life expectancy reduction decreased the OAE prevalence in older age groups (Fig C(c) in S1 Text).

Model predicted impact of ivermectin MDA

We used the OAE model with estimated parameters to assess the impact of annual MDA coverage on the OAE incidence and prevalence. We considered three different coverage levels: 50%, 60%, and 70%, and we calculated the incidence from the model output. Fig 4A shows the reduction in OAE cases after multiple years of annual MDA with different population coverages. The OAE incidence also decreased with long-term annual MDA (i.e., number of zeros increased in the curve with higher coverage) (Fig 4B). The OAE prevalence reduced significantly with relatively higher coverage and longer duration of MDA (Fig 4A); with 70% annual coverage, the prevalence of OAE reduced to almost nil (<0.01%) after 15 years of MDA implementation. The results of multivariate sensitivity analysis of MDA on the OAE incidence are given in Fig D in S1 Text.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Predicted OAE prevalence (%) following the initiation of ivermectin MDA: (a) Incidence of OAE (cases per 100,000), (b) new OAE cases, and (c) total mf prevalence (percentage of population with positive skin snip) under three different coverage levels of annual MDA. Each line represents the mean of 100 simulation runs. Plot of changes in incidence is given in the S1 Text: (See Fig F in S1 Text).

Fig 5 shows that there is a clear shift in the mean age of persons with OAE resulting from a change in the age-specific OAE prevalence due to annual ivermectin MDA. Although this pattern is not clearly observed at 50% coverage, with higher coverage of 60% or more, the prevalence in the 11–20 years age group becomes lower as the OAE prevalence peak shifts to the 21–30 years age group (see Fig 2).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Estimated age specific OAE prevalence due to the impact of annual ivermectin MDA with coverages of: (a) 50%, (b) 60%, and (c) 70%.

Model predicted impact of vector control

We also explored the effect of vector control with different assumed efficacy (i.e., the assumed percentage reduction of biting rates). OAE incidence declined significantly after the implementation of vector control (Fig 6). In 20 years of vector control with 40% reduction of blackfly biting rates, OAE incidence decreased by 37%, while 80% efficacy achieved approximately 81% reduction of the OAE incidence for the same duration. The results of multivariate sensitivity analysis of vector control on the OAE incidence are given in Fig E in S1 Text.

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Predicted (a) OAE prevalence (%) and (b) new prevalence (%), and (c) total mf prevalence (percentage of population with positive skin snip) after implementation of vector control under five different efficacy scenarios (% reduction in biting rate due to vector control). Plot of changes in incidence is given in the S1 Text (See Fig G in S1 Text).

To predict the impact of combined interventions including annual MDA and vector control, we considered scenarios with three different vector control efficacies: 60%, 70%, and 80% (Fig 7). Three different MDA coverage levels annually were also considered in each scenario: 40%, 50% and 60%. As observed, implementation of annual MDA combined with different efficacy level of vector control for approximately 20 years reduced the OAE incidence significantly to nearly zero.

Fig 7.

Fig 7

Predicted number of OAE cases (Left panel: Total cases; Right panel: new cases) after implementing combined annual ivermectin MDA and vector control of efficacy levels: (a-b) 60%, (c-d) 70% and (e-f) 80%.

Discussion

Using OAE data from Maridi County in South Sudan, we quantified the parameters of a new OAE sub-model in ONCHOSIM. With the estimated parameters, the model generates an age-specific prevalence pattern similar to the empirical OAE data, and consistent with trends observed between onchocerciasis prevalence and epilepsy (all types) as previously reported by Pion et al [16]. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to describe the uncertainty of these parameters when applied to different age groups in our study population. We evaluated the impact of ivermectin MDA under different programmatic scenarios and showed that annual MDA at a good coverage (≥70%) can significantly reduce OAE incidence, so that disease prevalence shifts towards older age groups. Reducing biting rates via vector control strategies may also reduce the OAE incidence.

Optimal MDA will rapidly affect the OAE incidence by preventing more children and adolescents from developing OAE. Due to the chronic nature of the condition, the prevalence of OAE changes more gradually: people who developed OAE prior to onchocerciasis elimination will remain alive for some time, thereby contributing to the pool of prevalent cases until they die. Our model suggests that MDA to control onchocerciasis control should be implemented consistently for about 10 years in order to notice a substantial impact on the prevalence of OAE. These findings concur with pooled data from West-African countries where epilepsy prevalence was seen to decrease after several years of onchocerciasis control [22]. The decline in prevalence is associated with an age-shift of OAE cases to older age groups as was observed in Cameroon and Northern Uganda [21,47]. In our model, ivermectin MDA can reduce the prevalence and incidence of epilepsy, which should motivate policymakers to strengthen onchocerciasis elimination programs, particularly in highly endemic onchocerciasis areas [39].

If there is indeed a causal relationship between onchocerciasis and epilepsy then the current disease burden of onchocerciasis has likely been underestimated so far, as suggested by others [24]. Formerly, the focus of onchocerciasis control programs was primarily on skin and ocular complications of the disease, leading to the premature conclusion that in many onchocerciasis-endemic areas, the disease is no longer a public health problem thanks to long-term interventions [48]. Unfortunately, the neurological manifestations of onchocerciasis such as OAE (including nodding syndrome) cause significant morbidity, disability, and mortality [49]. Preliminary calculations estimated that in former APOC countries, OAE was responsible for an additional 13% of the total reported years lived with disability attributable to onchocerciasis [24]. This additional burden highlights the public health concern that OAE poses to onchocerciasis-endemic communities across Africa. In view of the new targets set by the World Health Organization regarding neglected tropical diseases in general and onchocerciasis in particular [50], highly endemic onchocerciasis areas should be prioritized for the implementation and/or strengthening of onchocerciasis elimination strategies.

Study limitations

Like any other model, our OAE model has certain limitations. The pathophysiological mechanisms causing OAE remain unclear at present [8]. Hence, it was not possible to explicitly account for more detailed biological processes involved in OAE development and build a mechanistic model of OAE which might provide a better estimation. We have estimated model parameters based on cross-sectional data. A detailed model based on new insights about the pathophysiological mechanism of OAE and with cohort-based individual-level age-stratified OAE data might improve the model.

Despite these knowledge gaps, we have made a first effort in capturing the main patterns in the epidemiology of OAE and how it can be altered by onchocerciasis elimination strategies. We calibrated our model estimates using data from a single location, Maridi County in southern South Sudan, with a rather complex history of control. Further validation is required using age-specific cross-sectional data and longitudinal data from various geographical and epidemiological foci (including other onchocerciasis-endemicity levels). In this regard, a prospective monitoring of the epilepsy and onchocerciasis situation in Maridi County is ongoing to obtain empirical data about the extent to which control interventions against onchocerciasis would impact the incidence of OAE [51]. Such prospective data could serve as a basis to evaluate the performance of our newly developed model in predicting longitudinal OAE trends.

Conclusion

OAE is a major health problem in foci with high ongoing onchocerciasis transmission in Africa. Although much effort has been invested so far to eliminate onchocerciasis across the continent, the effectiveness has varied and areas with high OAE prevalence remain. Further attention for onchocerciasis elimination is needed in these areas, not only to fight onchocerciasis but also to prevent OAE. Our model results can be used to further optimize onchocerciasis and OAE elimination strategies in areas where current strategies are insufficient. In highly endemic villages in Maridi, South Sudan, we would recommend high ivermectin MDA coverage, particularly among school aged children, together with a low cost and environmental friendly community-based vector control method such as a “slash and clear” strategy [52].

Supporting information

S1 Text

(Section A: Annotated input file; Section B: Plots of estimated sum-squared-values in the parameter space and corresponding prevalence obtained from model; Section C: Sensitivity Analysis and plots; Section D: Multivariate sensitivity analysis of MDA and vector control.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. It shows how the work adheres to the five principles of the NTD Modelling Consortium.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the AMREF South Sudan research team for conducting the surveys that provided the data used in this paper.

Data Availability

The simulation codes are available in the supplementary appendix, and also through GitHub: https://gitlab.com/erasmusmc-public-health/wormsim2.78src2. After de-identification all individual participant data underlying the results reported in this article is available via the Zenodo repository at https://zenodo.org/record/7932357#.ZF9JBi1h1TY.

Funding Statement

RC gratefully acknowledge the European Research Council (ERC) Advanced grant (NSETHIO project No. 671055). SB received funding from Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) India (Grant No. SB/S9/Z-11/2017) for travel support and visiting Global Health Institute, University of Antwerp. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.WHO. Epilepsy Fact Sheet. Feb 2022. [cited 28 Nov 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/epilepsy. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beghi E. The Epidemiology of Epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54: 185–191. doi: 10.1159/000503831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ba-Diop A, Marin B, Druet-Cabanac M, Ngoungou EB, Newton CR, Preux P-M. Epidemiology, causes, and treatment of epilepsy in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet Neurology. 2014;13: 1029–1044. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70114-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ngugi AK, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Wagner RG, Kakooza-Mwesige A, Ae-Ngibise K, et al. Prevalence of active convulsive epilepsy in sub-Saharan Africa and associated risk factors: cross-sectional and case-control studies. The Lancet Neurology. 2013;12: 253–263. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70003-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kamuyu G, Bottomley C, Mageto J, Lowe B, Wilkins PP, Noh JC, et al. Exposure to Multiple Parasites Is Associated with the Prevalence of Active Convulsive Epilepsy in Sub-Saharan Africa. Garcia HH, editor. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2014;8: e2908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brattig NW, Cheke RA, Garms R. Onchocerciasis (river blindness)–more than a century of research and control. Acta Tropica. 2021;218: 105677. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Murdoch ME, Asuzu MC, Hagan M, Makunde WH, Ngoumou P, Ogbuagu KF, et al. Onchocerciasis: the clinical and epidemiological burden of skin disease in Africa. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96: 283–296. doi: 10.1179/000349802125000826 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Colebunders R, Njamnshi AK, Menon S, Newton CR, Hotterbeekx A, Preux P-M, et al. Onchocerca volvulus and epilepsy: A comprehensive review using the Bradford Hill criteria for causation. Bennuru S, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15: e0008965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burnham G. Onchocerciasis Lancet. 1998;351: 1341–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.WHO. Elimination of human onchocerciasis: progress report, 2021. Weekly epidemiological record. 2022; 591–598. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tumwine J, Vandemaele K, Chungong S, Richer M, Anker M, Ayana Y, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of nodding syndrome in Mundri County, southern Sudan. Af Hlth Sci. 2013;12: 242–248. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v12i3.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Colebunders R, Carter JY, Olore PC, Puok K, Bhattacharyya S, Menon S, et al. High prevalence of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy in villages in Maridi County, Republic of South Sudan: A community-based survey. Seizure. 2018;63: 93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boussinesq M, Pion SD, Ngangue D, Kamgno J. Relationship between onchocerciasis and epilepsy: a matched case-control study in the Mbam Valley, Republic of Cameroon. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2002;96: 537–541. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90433-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mmbando BP, Suykerbuyk P, Mnacho M, Kakorozya A, Matuja W, Hendy A, et al. High prevalence of epilepsy in two rural onchocerciasis endemic villages in the Mahenge area, Tanzania, after 20 years of community directed treatment with ivermectin. Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2018;7. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0450-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Abd-Elfarag G, Carter JY, Raimon S, Sebit W, Suliman A, Fodjo JNS, et al. Persons with onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy and nodding seizures have a more severe form of epilepsy with more cognitive impairment and higher levels of Onchocerca volvulus infection. Epileptic Disord. 2020;22: 301–308. doi: 10.1684/epd.2020.1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pion SD, Kaiser C, Boutros-Toni F, Cournil A, Taylor MM, Meredith SEO, et al. Epilepsy in Onchocerciasis Endemic Areas: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Population-Based Surveys. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2009;3. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chesnais CB, Nana-Djeunga HC, Njamnshi AK, Lenou-Nanga CG, Boullé C, Bissek A-CZ-K, et al. The temporal relationship between onchocerciasis and epilepsy: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018;18: 1278–1286. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30425-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chesnais CB, Bizet C, Campillo JT, Njamnshi WY, Bopda J, Nwane P, et al. A second population-based cohort study in Cameroon confirms the temporal relationship between onchocerciasis and epilepsy. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2020; ofaa206. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boatin BA. The Current State of the Onchocerciasis Control Programme in West Africa. Trop Doct. 2003;33: 209–214. doi: 10.1177/004947550303300407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Noma M, Zouré HG, Tekle AH, Enyong PA, Nwoke BE, Remme JH. The geographic distribution of onchocerciasis in the 20 participating countries of the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control: (1) priority areas for ivermectin treatment. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7: 325. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gumisiriza N, Mubiru F, Siewe Fodjo JN, Mbonye Kayitale M, Hotterbeekx A, Idro R, et al. Prevalence and incidence of nodding syndrome and other forms of epilepsy in onchocerciasis-endemic areas in northern Uganda after the implementation of onchocerciasis control measures. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9: 12. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-0628-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Siewe Fodjo JN, Remme JHF, Preux P-M, Colebunders R. Meta-analysis of epilepsy prevalence in West Africa and its relationship with onchocerciasis endemicity and control. International Health. 2020; ihaa012. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gumisiriza N, Kaiser C, Asaba G, Onen H, Mubiru F, Kisembo D, et al. Changes in epilepsy burden after onchocerciasis elimination in a hyperendemic focus of western Uganda: a comparison of two population-based, cross-sectional studies. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20: 1315–1323. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30122-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vinkeles Melchers NVS, Mollenkopf S, Colebunders R, Edlinger M, Coffeng LE, Irani J, et al. Burden of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy: first estimates and research priorities. Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2018;7. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0481-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lakwo TL, Raimon S, Tionga M, Siewe Fodjo JN, Alinda P, Sebit WJ, et al. The Role of the Maridi Dam in Causing an Onchocerciasis-Associated Epilepsy Epidemic in Maridi, South Sudan: An Epidemiological, Sociological, and Entomological Study. Pathogens. 2020;9: 315. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9040315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stolk WA, Walker M, Coffeng LE, Basáñez M-G, de Vlas SJ. Required duration of mass ivermectin treatment for onchocerciasis elimination in Africa: a comparative modelling analysis. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8: 552. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1159-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Basáñez MG, Walker M, Turner HC, Coffeng LE, de Vlas SJ, Stolk WA. River Blindness: Mathematical Models for Control and Elimination. Advances in Parasitology. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 247–341. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Verver S, Walker M, Kim YE, Fobi G, Tekle AH, Zouré HGM, et al. How Can Onchocerciasis Elimination in Africa Be Accelerated? Modeling the Impact of Increased Ivermectin Treatment Frequency and Complementary Vector Control. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2018;66: S267–S274. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vinkeles Melchers NVS, Stolk WA, van Loon W, Pedrique B, Bakker R, Murdoch ME, et al. The burden of skin disease and eye disease due to onchocerciasis in countries formerly under the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control mandate for 1990, 2020, and 2030. Ramos AN, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15: e0009604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vinkeles Melchers NVS, Stolk WA, Murdoch ME, Pedrique B, Kloek M, Bakker R, et al. How does onchocerciasis-related skin and eye disease in Africa depend on cumulative exposure to infection and mass treatment? Fairfax KC, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15: e0009489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Plaisier AP, van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JDF, Remme J, Alley ES. ONCHOSIM: a model and computer simulation program for the transmission and control of onchocerciasis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 1990;31: 43–56. doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(90)90030-d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Habbema JDF, Alley ES, Plaisier AP, van Oortmarssen GJ, Remme JHF. Epidemiological modelling for onchocerciasis control. Parasitology Today. 1992;8: 99–103. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(92)90248-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Colebunders R, Hendy A, Oijen M van. Nodding Syndrome in Onchocerciasis Endemic Areas. Trends in Parasitology. 2016;32: 581–583. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Siewe Fodjo JN, Ngarka L, Tatah G, Mengnjo MK, Nfor LN, Chokote ES, et al. Clinical presentations of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy (OAE) in Cameroon. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2019;90: 70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lenaerts E, Mandro M, Mukendi D, Suykerbuyk P, Dolo H, Wonya’Rossi D, et al. High prevalence of epilepsy in onchocerciasis endemic health areas in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2018;7. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0452-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bhwana D, Mmbando BP, Dekker MC, Mnacho M, Kakorozya A, Matuja W, et al. Clinical presentation of epilepsy in six villages in an onchocerciasis endemic area in Mahenge, Tanzania. Epileptic Disord. 2019;21: 425–435. doi: 10.1684/epd.2019.1093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Colebunders R, Abd-Elfarag G, Carter JY, Olore PC, Puok K, Menon S, et al. Clinical characteristics of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy in villages in Maridi County, Republic of South Sudan. Seizure. 2018;62: 108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Colebunders R, Siewe Fodjo JN, Hopkins A, Hotterbeekx A, Lakwo TL, Kalinga A, et al. From river blindness to river epilepsy: Implications for onchocerciasis elimination programmes. Hübner MP, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: e0007407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Colebunders R, Siewe Fodjo JN, Hotterbeekx A. Onchocerciasis-Associated Epilepsy, an Additional Reason for Strengthening Onchocerciasis Elimination Programs. Trends in Parasitology. 2018;34: 208–216. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baykan B, Wolf P. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy as a spectrum disorder: A focused review. Seizure. 2017;49: 36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Johnson TP, Tyagi R, Lee PR, Lee M-H, Johnson KR, Kowalak J, et al. Nodding syndrome may be an autoimmune reaction to the parasitic worm Onchocerca volvulus. Science Translational Medicine. 2017;9: eaaf6953. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zouré HG, Noma M, Tekle AH, Amazigo UV, Diggle PJ, Giorgi E, et al. The geographic distribution of onchocerciasis in the 20 participating countries of the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control: (2) pre-control endemicity levels and estimated number infected. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7: 326. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Colebunders R, Hendy A, Mokili JL, Wamala JF, Kaducu J, Kur L, et al. Nodding syndrome and epilepsy in onchocerciasis endemic regions: comparing preliminary observations from South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo with data from Uganda. BMC Research Notes. 2016;9. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1993-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.South Sudan | ESPEN. [cited 7 Nov 2021]. Available from: https://espen.afro.who.int/countries/south-sudan.
  • 45.Coffeng LE, Stolk WA, Hoerauf A, Habbema D, Bakker R, Hopkins AD, et al. Elimination of African Onchocerciasis: Modeling the Impact of Increasing the Frequency of Ivermectin Mass Treatment. McCaw JM, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e115886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kamgno J, Pion SDS, Boussinesq M. Demographic impact of epilepsy in Africa: results of a 10-year cohort study in a rural area of Cameroon. Epilepsia. 2003;44: 956–963. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.59302.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Siewe Fodjo JN, Tatah G, Tabah EN, Ngarka L, Nfor LN, Chokote SE, et al. Epidemiology of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy in the Mbam and Sanaga river valleys of Cameroon: impact of more than 13 years of ivermectin. Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2018;7. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0497-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dadzie Y, Amazigo UV, Boatin BA, Sékétéli A. Is onchocerciasis elimination in Africa feasible by 2025: a perspective based on lessons learnt from the African control programmes. Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2018;7: 63. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0446-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hotterbeekx A, Namale Ssonko V, Oyet W, Lakwo T, Idro R. Neurological manifestations in Onchocerca volvulus infection: A review. Brain Research Bulletin. 2019;145: 39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.08.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.World Health Organization. A road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. 2021. Feb. Available from: https://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/Ending-the-neglect-to-attain-the-SDGs—NTD-Roadmap.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Abd-Elfarag G, Logora MY, Carter JY, Ojok M, Songok J, Menon S, et al. The effect of bi-annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin on the incidence of epilepsy in onchocerciasis endemic villages in South Sudan: a study protocol. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7: 112. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0496-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Raimon S, Lakwo TL, Sebit WJ, Siewe Fodjo JN, Alinda P, Carter JY, et al. “Slash and Clear”, a Community-Based Vector Control Method to Reduce Onchocerciasis Transmission by Simulium sirbanum in Maridi, South Sudan: A Prospective Study. Pathogens. 2021;10: 1329. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011320.r001

Decision Letter 0

Eva Clark, Marc P Hubner

20 Mar 2023

Dear Dr Bhattacharyya,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy in Maridi, South Sudan: Modelling and exploring the impact of control measures against river blindness" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

All reviewers highlighted the importance of this study and had only minor requests. Please address their comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Marc P Hubner

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Eva Clark

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

All reviewers highlighted the importance of this study and had only minor requests. Please address their comments.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: See summary and general comments

Reviewer #2: This manuscript presents the results of a study that utilizes a well established model for onchocerciasis to investigate the effect of the currently available interventions (ivermectin MDA and vector control) on the prevalence of onchocerciasis associated epilepsy (OAE). OAE has been a manifestation of Onchocerca volvulus infection that has received increasing attention over the past few years. The model used here (ONCHOSIM) is one of the two most well established models for onchocerciasis, and this study involved only minor modifications to the model to evaluate the effect of the interventions on OAE.

Reviewer #3: -The study objectives are clearly articulated,

-the study design is appropriate to address the stated objectives.

-study population is clearly described,

- the sample size is sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested.

-The statistical analysis used support the conclusions.

-There is no concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: See summary and general comments

Reviewer #2: The results are clearly presented and are basically what someone knowledgable in the field would have predicted a priori. Ivermectin MDA was predicted to reduce the prevalence of OAE prevalence fairly quickly, while vector control also reduced prevalence, although less rapidly. Combining both MDA and vector control led to the most rapid reduction of prevalence.

I had a few minor concerns that I would like to see the authors address:

1. The authors report that they used data from a single community in South Sudan to parameterize the model and then report that the model closely replicated the observed prevalence of OAE in that community. Using the same dataset to parameterize the model and then validating the model against the same data is circular. The authors only had the single dataset, and recognize this as a limitation in the conclusions. But I do not feel the validation was really sound and suggest deleting this.

2. The authors report the effect of MDA at different coverages, but do not define coverage rates. In the field, two versions of coverage data are used - the percentage of the total population (the APOC standard) and the percentage of the eligible population treated (the Carter Center/OEPA standard). They need to define which of these they used.

3. The authors report the model predictions for OAE prevalence and mention that there is a shift in the prevalence age distribution as a result of OAE being a chronic condition, and reducing the incidence through MDA and vector control would explain this shift. I would actually like to see the model predictions for incidence as well as prevalence.

Reviewer #3: - results presented match the analysis plan

-The results are clearly presented, on page 15, Figure 6: the Y-axis should read New OAE prevalence (%) instead of OAE Prevalence (%)

-Tables and figures are of sufficient quality and clarity

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: See summary and general comments

Reviewer #2: The conclusions are all well supported by the data and the limitations are discussed. Public health relevance is clearly discussed.

Reviewer #3: -The conclusions are supported by the data presented

-the authors have presented the limitations of the analyses performed

- the helpfulness of the findings to advance the understanding of the topic under study is discussed

-the public health relevance of the study is clearly highlighted

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: See summary and general comments

Reviewer #2: None

Reviewer #3: NA

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Bhattacharyya et al. applied a mathematical modelling (ONCHOSIM) to predict the impact of MDA and vector control on epidemiology of OAE in the Maridi region (South Sudan). Based on their results, the authors suggest that OAE incidence and prevalence can be reduced by onchocerciasis elimination programmes and conclude that these programmes need to be intensified to prevent OAE. The content of the manuscript and presented findings are very important and from broad interest for researchers and health officials/national NTD programmes. However, several questions remain uncertain and need to be addressed:

1) In regards to the model assumptions the authors stated We assume that brain damage is (directly or indirectly) induced by immune responses triggered by dying mf..." Ivermectin is a microfilaricidal drug inducing mf cell death. According to assumption of the authors this would mean that MDA induces brain damage and thus treated individuals have a higher Di (t)/OAE rate?

2) Did the authors consider to include season (rain/dry season) into the model.

3) Since the authors conclude that MDA programmes need to be intensified, would ivermectin treatment twice a year improve OAE incidence.

4) The authors need to check the references. Maybe, I missed it but refs 16 and 24 is not mentioned within the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript represents the first attempt to examine the effect of the available interventions for onchocerciasis on OAE. Basically, the results suggest that the current interventions, if successfully implemented, will result in a dramatic reduction in the prevalence of OAE. This is reassuring to those of us involved in the effort to eliminate onchocerciasis in Africa.

Reviewer #3: The development of a mathematical model to predict the impact of the control measures against onchocerciasis is very timing and highly relevant. During the recent years, evidence have accumulated in Sub Saharan Africa on the association between Onchocerciasis and Epilepsy. Studies have also demonstrated that the control of Onchocerciasis has direct impact in reducing the number of new cases of epilepsy in the endemic area of Onchocerciasis. The capacity of predicting the impact of control measures in different scenarios of treatment coverage or Simulium biting rate reduction was lacking to give to the health system a comprehensive tool to address the problem of epilepsy associated to Onchocerciasis. The findings from this study are filling the gap of knowledge.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Thomas R. Unnasch

Reviewer #3: Yes: Samuel Wanji

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011320.r003

Decision Letter 1

Eva Clark, Marc P Hubner

19 Apr 2023

Dear Dr Bhattacharyya,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy in Maridi, South Sudan: Modelling and exploring the impact of control measures against river blindness' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Marc P Hubner

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Eva Clark

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Thanks for the revised manuscript. You addressed all previous comments from the reviewers and there are no additional requests that require another round of review. However, please make sure to mention the new Supplementary Figure S6 in your final manuscript and the "supplementary information" section.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011320.r004

Acceptance letter

Eva Clark, Marc P Hubner

23 May 2023

Dear Dr Bhattacharyya,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy in Maridi, South Sudan: Modelling and exploring the impact of control measures against river blindness," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Text

    (Section A: Annotated input file; Section B: Plots of estimated sum-squared-values in the parameter space and corresponding prevalence obtained from model; Section C: Sensitivity Analysis and plots; Section D: Multivariate sensitivity analysis of MDA and vector control.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. It shows how the work adheres to the five principles of the NTD Modelling Consortium.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_10APR.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    The simulation codes are available in the supplementary appendix, and also through GitHub: https://gitlab.com/erasmusmc-public-health/wormsim2.78src2. After de-identification all individual participant data underlying the results reported in this article is available via the Zenodo repository at https://zenodo.org/record/7932357#.ZF9JBi1h1TY.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES