Table 3. Characteristics of the peer review process.
Sample 1 (N = 144) 7 | Sample 2 (N = 115) 7 | |
---|---|---|
Number of rounds of peer review | Med = 2, IQR = [1–2] | Med = 2, IQR = [1 –– 2] |
Number of rounds of revision | Med = 2, IQR = [2–4] | Med = 2, IQR = [2–3] |
Number of peer reviewers, per study | Med = 2, IQR = [2–2.25] | Med = 2, IQR = [2–2] |
Number of reviewers, total | 330 | 263 |
Peer reviewers identified by name | 180 (55) 8 | 146 (56) 8 |
Number of editors involved, per study | Med = 1, IQR = [1–1] | Med = 1, IQR = [1–1] |
Public posting of editors’ letter to the authors | 16 (11) 9 | 15 (13) 9 |
Editor identified by name | 10 (63) 10 | 8 (53) 10 |
7 sample 1 includes articles of any type of original research. Sample 2 is restricted to only randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
8 denominator is the total number of reviewers: /330 in sample 1 and /263 in sample 2
9 denominator is the number of editors involved: /144 in sample 1 and /115 in sample 2
10 denominator is the number of editors who publicly posted letters to the authors: /16 in sample 1 and /15 in sample 2