Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286908

Table 3. Characteristics of the peer review process.

Sample 1 (N = 144) 7 Sample 2 (N = 115) 7
Number of rounds of peer review Med = 2, IQR = [1–2] Med = 2, IQR = [1 –– 2]
Number of rounds of revision Med = 2, IQR = [2–4] Med = 2, IQR = [2–3]
Number of peer reviewers, per study Med = 2, IQR = [2–2.25] Med = 2, IQR = [2–2]
Number of reviewers, total 330 263
Peer reviewers identified by name 180 (55) 8 146 (56) 8
Number of editors involved, per study Med = 1, IQR = [1–1] Med = 1, IQR = [1–1]
Public posting of editors’ letter to the authors 16 (11) 9 15 (13) 9
Editor identified by name 10 (63) 10 8 (53) 10

7 sample 1 includes articles of any type of original research. Sample 2 is restricted to only randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

8 denominator is the total number of reviewers: /330 in sample 1 and /263 in sample 2

9 denominator is the number of editors involved: /144 in sample 1 and /115 in sample 2

10 denominator is the number of editors who publicly posted letters to the authors: /16 in sample 1 and /15 in sample 2