Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 5;10(6):ENEURO.0056-23.2023. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0056-23.2023

Table 2.

Speaking-induced suppression and peak latency difference between the speaking and listening conditions

Patients with Alzheimer’s disease
(n =20, mean ± SEM)
Healthy controls (n =12,
mean ± SEM)
Left hemisphere Right hemisphere Left hemisphere Right hemisphere
SIS, M50 −0.20 ± 0.11 −0.23 ± 0.13 −0.05 ± 0.14 −0.20 ± 0.17
SIS, M100 −0.06 ± 0.10 −0.04 ± 0.12 0.41 ± 0.13 0.16 ± 0.16
SIS, M200 −0.01 ± 0.09 0.16 ± 0.09 0.05 ± 0.12 −0.01 ± 0.12
Latency diff, M50 (ms) −2.2 ± 4.5 −12.5 ± 5.1 −5.1 ± 5.8 −12.3 ± 6.5
Latency diff, M100 (ms) −27.2 ± 5.7 −29.8 ± 7.6 −18.0 ± 7.4 −17.0 ± 9.9
Latency diff, M200 (ms) −24.2 ± 6.4 −33.7 ± 7.8 −10.0 ± 8.3 −36.3 ± 10.0

Latency diff = peak latency difference between the speaking and listening conditions.