Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 8;13:9345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36423-7

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) CO conversion graphs, dry fuel gas (FG1) with Monolith #2 (CuO/CeO2), all λ = 2.5, varying GHSV. (b) CO conversion graphs, moist fuel gas (FG2) with Monolith #2 (CuO/CeO2), all λ = 2.5, varying GHSV. (c,d) corresponding CO concentrations at outlet.