Table 1.
First author | Year | Cohort | Lesion(s) | Pt no. | Control | XR type | Modality | Study description | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sadeghi et al.[17] | 2020 | Adult | TV repair, Ao root/arch reconstruction, VAD extraction | 6 | N | VR | CT |
Prospective case series Qualitative surgeon evaluation of VR system in procedure planning. |
Perceived user-friendliness 4/5; usefulness and efficiency 4.4/5; attitude towards (future) use 4/5 |
Lu et al.[10] | 2020 | Paed. | AVV repair, VSD closure, DORV repair, TAPVD repair/revision, MAPCA unifocalisation, LSVC baffling to RA | 25 | N | MR | echo, CT, MRI |
Prospective comparative study Qualitative surgeon feedback on prospective use of MR system for surgical planning compared to 2D screen |
MR images reviewed for longer (8 vs. 3 min, p < 0 0.001) MR review “worthwhile” in 96% cases Improved anatomical understanding in 84% Surgical plan altered in 2 cases |
Cen et al.[15] | 2021 | Paed. | PA + MAPCAs | 5 | N | VR/ MR | CT | Prospective case series - surgeon review of 3D print and VR of segmented model STL pre-operatively, intraoperative display of the model in MR and questionnaire |
No mortality. 3 complications - prolonged pleural drainage, ST changes and pneumonia. Surgeons reported subjective benefit of all 3D modelling modalities. |
Tedoriya et al.[26] | 2020 | Adult | AoV repair | 26 | N | MR | CT |
Prospective case series – review of CT imaging in VR prior to AoV repair |
6/26 required additional procedure 1/26 required AVR 1/26 died 19/26 - good echocardiographic result |
Vettukattil et al.[13] | 2020 | Paed. |
TAPVD + AVSD (n = 4) ccTGA + PS PA/IVS + failing Fontan Univentricular + PAB |
7 | N | MR | CT |
Prospective case series – MR review of imaging to determine feasibility for biventricular repair |
Biventricular repair in 7/7, no mortality. 4/7 - uncomplicated recovery 2/7 – required ECMO 1/7 – AKI and Guillain-Barre. Clinical status at 11 months − 5/7 NYHA I, 1/7 NYHA II, 1/7 ongoing recovery from Guillain-Barre. |
Ye et al.[9] | 2021 | Paed. | DORV | 34 | Y | MR | CT |
Prospective randomised control study Patients allocated to pre-op imaging review on 2D screen (control) or standard + MR review imaging (intervention). |
Surgical planning time reduced in MR group (52 ± 11 min vs. 66 ± 18 min; p < 0.05) Correct pre-op identification of anatomy in all MR cases, incorrect in 2 control group cases No change to pre-op plan in MR group, strategy modified in 3 control cases. |
Gehrsitz et al.[8] | 2021 | Paed. | TOF, CoA, AP window, ALCAPA, TGA, PV disease, PA/VSD, truncus arteriosus, ccTGA, AVSD, ductus arteriosus aneurysm | 26 | Y | MR | CT, MRI |
Prospective comparative study - surgeons completed structured questionnaires comparing 2D screen imaging review, MR, and 3D-printed model. Surgical preparation time compared with retrospectively matched controls. |
MR rated better than 2D-monitor imaging + 3D prints in all categories. (mean 4.4/5 ± 1 vs. 3.7/5 ± 1.3, p < 0.05). 3D print + MR reduced intra-op preparation time (59 ± 23 min vs. 73 ± 43 min, P < 0.05). |
Chan et al.[18] | 2021 | Paed. | Unifocalisation of MAPCAs, pulmonary artery reconstructions | 17 | N | MR | CT |
Prospective case series – MR review of segmented CT models prior to surgery. |
No system-related surgical complications Manual image processing time 2–4 h MR viewing time from 10–30 min |
Pushparajah et al.[11] | 2021 | Paed. | AVV repair | 15 | N | VR | 3DE |
Retrospective – surgeon review of pre-op 3DE from previous AVV surgery. Review on 2D screen and in VR. Recommended surgical strategy recorded for 2D + VR review, compared to operation note |
In 67% of cases, the surgeon reported that VR gave them more confidence in the anatomy and would have made modifications to surgical approach in over 57% of cases. |
Milano et al.[12] | 2019 | Paed. | DORV | 10 | N | VR | CT, MRI |
Retrospective – surgeons reviewed segmentations on 2D screen, 3D print, and in VR. Recommended suitability for biventricular repair and requirement for ASO |
Surgical strategy correctly identified in 70% after 2D review, 85% after 3D print and 95% after VR visualisation. Correctly identified need for ASO in 45% with 2D review; 55% with 3D print and 60% after VR review |
Paed. : paediatric, N: no, Y: yes
3DE: 3D echocardiography, AKI: acute kidney injury, ALCAPA: anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery, Ao: aorta, AP: aortopulmonary, AVSD: atrioventricular septal defect; AVR: aortic valve replacement, AVV: Atrioventricular valve, ccTGA: congenitally-corrected transposition of the great arteries, CoA: coarctation of the aorta, DORV: double outlet right ventricle, ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, LSVC: left superior vena cava, MAPCA: major aortopulmonary collateral, PA: pulmonary atresia; PAB: pulmonary artery band, PV: pulmonary valve, RA: right atrium, TOF: tetralogy of Fallot, TV: tricuspid valve, VAD: ventricular assist device, VSD: ventricular septal defect