Skip to main content
. 2023 May 2;15:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.04.005

Table 3.

Differences in the stroke volume index – heart rate correlation between healthy controls and ME/CFS patients and between supine and end-tilt.

Correlations supine healthy controls versus ME/CFS patients
Slope difference
Healthy Controls ME/CFS patients p-value
Correlation supine R and p-value Correlation supine R and p-value
Y = −0,9769 *X + 99,18 0.52; < 0.0001 Y = −0,7510 *X + 97,86 0.42; < 0.0001 0.39
Correlations end-tilt healthy controls versus ME/CFS patients
Correlation end-tilt R and p-value Correlation end-tilt R and p-value
Y = −1968 *X + 130,7 0.68; < 0.0001 Y = −1066 *X + 108,4 0.39; < 0.0001 0.0063
Correlations healthy controls: supine versus end-tilt
Slope difference
Supine End-tilt p-value
Correlation R and p-value Correlation R and p-value
Y = −0,9769 *X + 99,18 0.52; < 0.0001 Y = −1968 *X + 130,7 0.68; < 0.0001 0.0095
Correlations ME/CFS patients: supine versus end-tilt
correlation R and p-value correlation R and p-value
Y = −0,7510 *X + 97,86 0.42; < 0.0001 Y = −1066 *X + 108,4 0.39; < 0.0001 0.045

ME/CFS: myalgic encephalomyelitis. X = stroke volume index, Y = heart rate; A p-value of < 0.01 is considered statistically significant.