Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;15(5):3267–3278.

Table 6.

Comparison of standardized residuals of SPV, PTv, TPv, v.CPF and v.MCP in different developing methods after post hoc testing

Items Quality of the vein depiction Cramer’s V P values

Not identified Identified Identified clearly
TOF SPV -0.6 0.6 0.0 0.082 0.732
PTv 0.9 -0.9 0.0
TPv 0.9 -0.9 0.0
v.CPF 0-.6 0.6 0.0
v.MCP -0.6 0.6 0.0
Fiesta SPV -6.8 5.7 3.4 0.282 < 0.001
PTv 2.1 -1.6 -1.3
TPv 2.6 -2.2 -1.3
v.CPF 1.0 -1.0 -0.4
v.MCP 1.0 -1.0 -0.4
Magnitude SPV -4.6 2.9 0.9 0.694 < 0.001
PTv -3.9 -0.9 4.2
TPv -0.4 1.5 -1.2
v.CPF 1.1 0.0 -0.9
v.MCP 7.7 -3.5 -3.0
Phase SPV -3.6 0.1 2.8 0.578 < 0.001
PTv -3.2 -0.7 3.1
TPv -2.8 0.9 1.5
v.CPF 0.8 0.5 -1.0
v.MCP 8.9 -0.7 -6.4

SPV, superior petrosal vein; PTv, pontotrigeminal vein; TPv, transverse pontine vein; v.CPF, vein of the cerebellopontine fissure; v.MCP, vein of the middle cerebellar peduncle; Fiesta, fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition; 3D-TOF, three-dimensional time of flight.