Table 2.
Sr No | NCT | Study type and allocation | Title | Phase | Total no. of patients | Regimen | Outcome | Condition | Remarks | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NCT00849121 | Interventional, randomized | Two-Arm study of a DNA vaccine encoding prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) in patients with non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer | I | 17 |
pTVG-HP with rhGM-CSF Every 3 Months Post Week 12 pTVG-HP with rhGM-CSF Variable Dosing Post Week 12 |
Non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer | Excellent PAP-specific CTL response was observed. Also, the PSA doubling time did rise during the course of treatment. After receiving the therapy for year, 12/17 patients were free of metastasis | [18, 143] | |
2 | NCT02172911 | Interventional, non-randpmized | A study of INO-3112 DNA vaccine with electroporation in participants with cervical cancer | I/II | 10 |
Curative therapy with INO-3112 Salvage therapy with INO-3112 |
Antibody responses against HPV oncoproteins were detected in up to 60% of patients | HPV-16 and/or 18-positive cervical carcinoma | TRAEs were all Grade 1, primarily injection site related. Adjuvant MEDI0457 (INO-3112) is feasible after chemoradiation for locally advanced and/or recurrent cervical cancer. More than half of the patients developed detectable immune responses to HPV antigens after treatment | [58, 144] |
3 | NCT01341652 | Interventional, randomized | Phase II PAP plus GM-CSF Versus GM-CSF alone for non-metastatic prostate cancer | II | 99 |
pTVG-HP vaccine with GM-CSF GM-CSF |
Two-year MFS was not different between study arms (41.8% vaccine v 42.3%. PAP-specific T cells were detected in both cohorts, including multifunctional PAP-specific T-helper 1–biased T cells | Non-metastatic prostate cancer | Except for a subset with quickly progressing disease, pTVG-HP therapy did not show a general increase in 2-year MFS in patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer | [139, 145] |
4 | NCT01440816 | Interventional, non-randomized | IL-12 gene and in Vivo electroporation-mediated plasmid DNA vaccine therapy in patients with merkel cell cancer (MCC) | II | 15 |
One cycle of tavo with dose of 0.5 mg/ml followed by electroporation and proceeded to definitive treatment Four cycles of tavo with dose of 0.5 mg/ml followed by electroporation, with 12 weeks between each cycle and continuing till 12 months |
The ORR was 25% (3/12) in cohort B, with 2 patients experiencing durable clinical benefit (16 and 55 + months, respectively). Two cohort A patients were recurrence-free at 44 + and 75 + months, respectively | Merkel cell carcinoma | The therapy was safe and feasible and no toxicities were observed. Several individuals experienced systemic immune responses and clinically significant benefits as a result of the sustained local production of the IL12 protein and local inflammation | [146, 147] |
5 | NCT00199849 | Interventional, non-randomized | NY-ESO-1 plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) cancer vaccine | I | 18 |
4 µg administered as 4 × 1 µg PMEDs 8 µg administered as 8 × 1 µg PMEDs 8 µg as a cluster dosage of 4 doses (6 6 8 8) as 2 × 1 µg PMEDs per day |
Prostate cancer Bladder cancer Non-small cell lung cancer Esophageal cancer Sarcoma |
Most patients demonstrated an overall rise in antibody titer and NY-ESO-1-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. Besides that, not all patients experienced a positive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction to the protein NY-ESO-1 | [148, 149] | |
6 | NCT00398073 | Interventional, randomized | Vaccine therapy in treating patients with stage IIB, stage IIC, stage III, or stage IV melanoma | I | 35 |
Insertion of mouse gp100 DNA through PMED Insertion of mouse gp100 DNA through intramuscular injection |
Melanoma | The trial demonstrated that the evoked immune responses reduce tumor development and increase survival | [102, 150] |