Table 2. 31P MAS NMR Isotropic Chemical Shift, Chemical Shift Anisotropy, Asymmetry Parameter, Composition, Fitting Quality, T1 Relaxation Times, and Back-Calculation Factors of Phosphate Standards.
| sample | formula | δ(iso)a | δ(CSA)b | η(CSA)c | fractiond | best overlap (%)e | T1 (s)f | T1 back-calculation factorg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCP | Ca[H2PO4]2 | 0.69 | –84.8 | 0.05 | 0.49 | 69.2% | 877 | 2.57 |
| –3.77 | –96.9 | 0.14 | 0.51 | 1099 | 2.99 | |||
| MSP | Na[H2PO4] | 3.37 | –93.7 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 93.1% | 1388 | 3.55 |
| 2.11 | –64.7 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 1492 | 3.75 | |||
| MKP | K[H2PO4] | 4.93 | –46.4 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 88.0% | 546 | 1.94 |
| STPP | Na5[P3O10] | 5.85 | 109.8 | 0.08 | 0.38 | 90.0% | 1031 | 2.86 |
| 2.21 | 97.7 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 631 | 2.10 | |||
| –4.93 | –123.1 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 1408 | 3.59 | |||
| –6.54 | –127.8 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 1036 | 2.87 | |||
| KTPP | K5[P3O10] | 0.11 | 101.3 | 0.06 | 0.36 | 89.9% | 801 | 2.43 |
| –2.83 | 104.8 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 1009 | 2.82 | |||
| –15.68 | –117.0 | 0.08 | 0.029 | 271 | 1.44 | |||
| –18.0 | –134.9 | 0.08 | 0.30 | 1543 | 3.84 | |||
| TSPP | Na4[P2O7] | 3.95 | 107.4 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 73.9% | 753 | 2.33 |
| 3.47 | 83.1 | 0.02 | 0.44 | |||||
| 3.04 | 83.3 | 0.03 | 0.28 | |||||
| 2.65 | 98.1 | 0.02 | 0.13 | |||||
| TKPP | K4[P2O7] | 2.04 | 94.0 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 93.2% | 523 | 1.90 |
| 1.61 | 91.8 | 0.10 | 0.072 | 605 | 2.05 | |||
| 1.24 | 88.3 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 536 | 1.92 | |||
| 0.58 | 79.8 | 0.09 | 0.093 | 612 | 2.07 | |||
| –0.07 | 86.1 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 408 | 1.69 | |||
| –1.85 | 83.9 | 0.11 | 0.082 | 644 | 2.13 | |||
| –3.11 | 86.4 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 608 | 2.06 | |||
| –3.67 | 89.0 | 0.11 | 0.027 | 537 | 1.93 | |||
| bone meal | unknown | 3.56 | –60.5 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 95.1% | 23 | 1.15 |
| 1.68 | –62.2 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 25 | 1.15 | |||
| 0.16 | –52.2 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 27 | 1.15 | |||
| –1.08 | –64.3 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 27 | 1.15 |
Isotropic chemical shift in ppm.
Chemical shift anisotropy in ppm.
Asymmetry parameter.
Fraction = (integral of one component)/(total integral from all components). The relative uncertainties (standard deviation/mean) from repeated iterations of deconvolution are less than 0.3%.
Best overlap (%): the simplex iteration minimizes the least squares difference between the experimental spectrum and the superimposed simulated spectra. overlap (%) > 70–90, good agreement. A single Lorentzian–Gaussian line width was used for all the peaks.
T1 relaxation time (fitted with eq 1) for each individual isotropic peak. The components for TSPP are overlapped; therefore, a bulk T1 relaxation time is measured from the entire isotropic chemical shift region (5.2–1.7 ppm). The relative uncertainties (standard deviation/mean) from multiple measurements of T1 for each signal are less than 0.8%.
T1 relaxation back-calculation factor is defined in eq 3 in the Discussion session (vide infra, Discussion, eq 3).