Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;145(22):11907–11913. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c02470

Table 1. Selected Optimization Reactionsa.

graphic file with name ja3c02470_0008.jpg

# deviation from standard reaction conditions L 3 (% ee) 4 5
1 Pd2(dba)3 2.5 mol % PPh3 2 (n.d.) 11 <5
2 Pd2(dba)3 2.5 mol % L1 <5 (30) <5 <5
3 Pd2(dba)3 2.5 mol % L2 <5 (48)   <5
4   L3 38 (96) 8 5
5 Pd2dba3·CHCl3 2.5 mol % L3 38 (96) 9 10
6 Pd2dba3 2.5 mol % in PhH L3 18 (98) 11 <5
7 NaF 10 mol % L3 49 (96) 8 6
8b Et2SiH2 2.5 equiv, NaF 10 mol % L3 29 (n.d.) 38 29
9b [Ir] 2.5 mol %, NaF 10 mol % L3 5 (n.d.) <5 <5
10b [Ir] 0.5 mol %, NaF 10 mol % L3 14 (n.d.) 34 45

graphic file with name ja3c02470_0009.jpg

a

Reaction conditions: first step = 1a (0.2 mmol), Et2SiH2 (5 equiv), [Ir(coe)2Cl]2 (1 mol %), 50 °C, 3 h; second step = 2a (1.5 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), L6 (7 mol %), CH2Cl2 (0.2 M), 40 °C, 16 h. LC/UV–vis yields were determined via calibration curve obtained using isolated products. L = ligand; n.d. = not determined.

b

3-Chloropyridine (1b) was used as substrate.