Table 2.
Comparison with SOTA Methods on the Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection Dataset.
| Method | Dice | IoU |
|---|---|---|
| U-Net [18] | 0.8550 | 0.7850 |
| UNet++ [19] | 0.8090 | 0.7290 |
| CaraNet [20] | 0.8700 | 0.782 |
| PraNet [21] | 0.8750 | 0.7870 |
| TransUNet [22] | 0.8800 | 0.8090 |
| TransFuse [23] | 0.9010 | 0.840 |
| Double-UNet [24] | 0.8962 | 0.8212 |
| Polyp-PVT [25] | 0.8962 | 0.8212 |
| DuAT [26] | 0.9230 | 0.8670 |
| Polar Res-U-Net++(SOTA) [27] | 0.9253 | 0.8743 |
| SAM (259 samples, common practice) | 0.6636 | 0.5566 |
| SAM (1000 samples, official test set) | 0.7306 | 0.6169 |