Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;20(11):5934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20115934

Table 3.

Feasibility outcomes for patients (n = 20) and healthcare providers (n = 8).

Feasibility Measure Outcome Description Results a
Acceptability Satisfaction (patients) Overall satisfaction with the programme 9.0 (7.4–10.0)/10
Satisfaction with the educational content 9.0 (8.6–9.5)/10
Satisfaction with the delivery of education (i.e., via WhatsApp) 9.0 (8.1–10.0)/10
Satisfaction with the action plans and diaries 9.1 (8.9–10.0)/10
Satisfaction (healthcare providers) Overall satisfaction with the programme 9.8 (9.6–10.0)/10
Satisfaction with the educational content 8.5 (7.3–9.0)/10
Satisfaction with the delivery of education (i.e., via WhatsApp) 8.1 (7.7–9.0)/10
Demand Internet use (patients) Have internet access 18 (90.0)
Device mostly used to access internet: cell phone 16 (80.0)
Use of Internet to search for health information 14 (70.0)
Reasons to participate in the virtual educational programme (patients) Opportunity to learn about exercise 8 (40.0)
Maintain or improve health through education 8 (40.0)
Learn about their overall health condition 5 (25.0)
Stay in touch with programme during the pandemic 3 (15.0)
Perceived demand (patients) Usefulness of information, yes 20 (100.0)
Effectiveness of bi-weekly calls, yes 18 (90.0)
Implementation b Access and use of virtual education tools Use of weekly educational materials (video and booklet) 34 (100.0)
Creation of weekly learning plans 18 (53.0)
Creation of reflection diaries 16 (47.0)
Practicality Ability of patient participants to carry out intervention activities and maintain healthy habits after end of intervention Heart health behaviours changed after intervention, yes 19 (95.0)

a Results presented as median (IQR) or n (%). b Results from implementation were collected for 34 patient participants.