Table 2.
(P)olitical/ organizational -Clarity of programme direction and agenda setting -Standardisation of care model and processes across levels of care and at the national level -Support and commitment from senior leadership -Provider stakeholder interests and willingness to run the programme -Presence of programmatic champions |
(E)conomic -Financial gradients across care settings for patients -Availability of resources to support programme implementation and staff development |
(S)ociocultural -Quality of partnership with other care providers within the team and across different care settings -Interdisciplinary collaboration to deliver team-based care across care settings -Patients’ motivation towards the uptake of care at primary or community levels -Patients’ perceptions and understanding of services on offer -Quality of partnership between providers and patients and/or caregivers |
(T)echnology/technical -Use of information systems that link patient data across care entities -Availability of alternative forms of communication between providers across various entities -Existing professional and technical capacities of providers in the community -Training opportunities and upskilling of care coordinators |
(E)nvironmental -Flexibility to develop localised practices or protocols that suit contextualised needs -Proximity of provider location that can facilitate collaboration |