Abstract
Despite improvements in cardiovascular care in recent decades, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of death worldwide. At its core, CVD is a largely preventable disease with diligent risk factor management and early detection. As highlighted in the American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8, physical activity plays a central role in CVD prevention at an individual and population level. Despite pervasive knowledge of the numerous cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular health benefits of physical activity, physical activity has steadily decreased over time and unfavorable changes in physical activity occur throughout people’s lives. Here, we use a lifecourse framework to examine the evidence reporting on the association of physical activity with CVD. From in utero to older adults, we review and discuss the evidence detailing how physical activity may prevent incident CVD and mitigate CVD related morbidity and mortality across all life stages.
Subject Terms: Exercise, Lifestyle, Cardiovascular Disease
Introduction
At the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention are modifiable, lifestyle health behaviors, including habitual physical activity1,2. There is strong scientific evidence supporting the association of physical activity with reduced risk of cardiometabolic risk factors and clinical endpoints3. For individuals with established CVD, physical activity attenuates progression, reduces the risk of developing another chronic condition, and improves quality of life and physical functioning3. Based on this evidence, physical activity is included as a component of the American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 metric used to monitor cardiovascular health on the population level4.
While the benefits of physical activity are well-understood, declines in physical activity across the lifecourse are well documented5. Biological, behavioral, and/or psychosocial factors have been shown to be associated with physical activity changes across the lifecourse6. These changes can also be triggered by major life events7 that can temporarily interrupt or permanently change habitual behaviors7,8. Across the lifecourse, even short-term reductions in physical activity can accumulate and translate into increased susceptibility to cardiometabolic risk factor development, risk of subsequent non-fatal or fatal CVD events, related comorbid conditions, and/or premature mortality9. As defined in lifecourse epidemiology framework, the accumulation of risk concept posits that exposures, including inadequate physical activity, gradually accumulate and cause damage to biological systems as the duration and/or severity of the exposure accumulates over the lifecourse leading to long-term disease or disability.
However, this evidence and related interpretations are rarely contextualized using a lifecourse framework. In a recent editorial, Mielke stated, “much assumed knowledge in this field is based on methods that empirically fail to consider that […] physical activity and sedentary behavior constantly change across the lifespan”10. Specifically, conclusions are often drawn based on a single assessment of physical activity obtained during an arbitrary period (e.g., midlife due to its proximity to median age of CVD onset) or repeated assessments obtained during a follow-up period that does not reflect a given life stage, a lifecourse transition, and/or the natural history of CVD progression. As a result, questions pertaining to the importance of timing and accumulation of the physical activity exposure across the lifecourse to optimize cardiometabolic health remain unresolved.
Therefore, the primary objective of this review is to evaluate the evidence reporting on the associations of physical activity with CVD progression by applying a lifecourse framework. Based on the gaps in current evidence, opportunities for future research are highlighted and discussed.
A Primer on the Natural History of Cardiovascular Disease
From birth, everyone is at risk for the development of CVD (Figure 1; Table 1). Most research on CVD development over the lifecourse has focused on atherosclerosis. Early stages of atherosclerotic disease are present in a substantial number of neonates, indicating the underlying processes may begin prior to birth11. As individuals progress through infancy and childhood, there is wide variation in the exposure to cardiovascular risk factors which results in varying trajectories of CVD. Related to this review, the association between sedentary behavior and atherosclerosis is mediated through NADPH oxidase activity and enhances reactive oxygen species in the vasculature12. Therefore, establishing a physically active lifestyle, and minimizing prolonged sedentary time, during childhood is increasingly seen as a powerful strategy for life-long CVD prevention13. During young adulthood, atherosclerosis may progress to fibrous plaques and the development of a necrotic core. Clinical manifestations of coronary atherosclerosis most commonly present in middle-aged adults as atherosclerotic lesions may calcify, hemorrhage, ulcerate, and thrombose, and in some cases result in ischemic events such as myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Middle-aged and older adults may suffer from the late stages of CVD with elevated risk of adverse events, reduced functional capacity, and death.
Figure 1: Physical activity and prevention of cardiovascular disease over the lifecourse.

Physical activity plays central roles in the primordial, primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of cardiovascular disease throughout the lifecourse. CAD = coronary artery disease; PVD = peripheral vascular disease; CVD = cardiovascular disease.
Table 1: A Primer on the Natural History of Cardiovascular Disease.
Using a disease progression framework alongside a lifecourse framework demonstrates the applicable prevention stages for each life stage49. Here we classify stages of prevention using epidemiology terminology, recognizing these are different from what is used in clinical guidelines.
| Stages of CVD Progression | Underlying | Susceptible | Subclinical | Clinical | Recovery, Disability or Death |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stages of Prevention | Primordial Risk factor reduction targeted towards the entire population through a focus on social and environmental conditions. |
Primary Risk factor reduction aimed at a susceptible population or individual. |
Secondary Early disease detection (screening) |
Tertiary
Disease management, reduction of disability, and co-morbidities |
|
| Goal: Reduce population prevalence of risk factors. | Goal: Prevent development of subclinical disease. | Goal: Diagnose disease in subclinical phase to improve prognosis. | Goal: Reduce severity of disease and any adverse sequelae. | ||
| Examples |
|
|
|
|
|
| Life stage | In-utero | ||||
| Infancy | |||||
| Early childhood | |||||
| Childhood and adolescence | |||||
| Young adults | |||||
| Midlife | |||||
| Older adults | |||||
While other cardiovascular and cardiometabolic diseases are also generally progressive through the lifecourse, they may present in any life stage and in some instances may fluctuate with behavioral modifications or therapeutic intervention. For example, a person may develop childhood obesity and subsequently develop diabetes in young adulthood. With weight loss (medical or surgical), hyperglycemia may resolve, and the person may return to a healthy weight.
Role of physical activity on biological pathways
The association of physical activity on CVD events is thought to be primarily mediated through impacts on CVD risk factors such as body weight, hypertension, diabetes, and lipids14. Overall, the cellular mechanisms by which these benefits are affected by physical activity are incompletely delineated. Hypertension appears to be prevented by physical activity via effects on sympathetic nervous system activity, renin-angiotensin system activity, sodium handling and improved endothelial function15 and does not appear to be driven by maintenance of a healthy weight16. Exercise improves insulin sensitivity and glucose uptake in skeletal muscle, helping reduce incidence of diabetes17. Aerobic physical activity decreases triglyceride and LDL concentrations while increasing HDL concentrations18. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms by which CVD prevention is achieved through physical activity.
Historical and Contemporary Methods to Estimate Physical Activity
Occupational Classifications or Job Types
Research related to the role of physical activity on CVD, specifically coronary heart disease (CHD), began in the late 1940’s with the seminal work of Dr. Jeremy Morris19, when little was known about the etiology of CHD. To explore the potential causes of CHD, the London Transport Study was conducted that compared the incidence of fatal CHD between two job categories among men aged 35 to 64 years; the conductors (active; walked up and down the bus aisles and stairs selling tickets and collecting passenger fares) and the drivers (non-active) of London’s double-decker buses20. The age-standardized rates of sudden death and death within the first three months that resulted from the first MI per 1,000 men per year was lower among the more active conductors when compared to the drivers. Findings from studies relying on job classification to estimate physical activity were replicated in a second set of government workers representing high and low active occupations (postmen versus telephonists)20 and among U.S. railroad workers in the early 1960’s21 and longshoremen in the early 1970’s22.
Sports Participation and Exercise During Leisure-Time
However in the 1960’s, as jobs became increasingly more sedentary, it became apparent that relying on occupational categories or job types to assess physical activity to examine associations with cardiovascular risk factors and disease would no longer be appropriate23 because the assessment strategy should elicit information on the largest contributors of energy expenditure for a given population24. Researchers transitioned to report-based methods to estimate physical activity during discretionary periods of the day. For example, Harvard Alumni Study investigators developed a questionnaire that assessed 1) flights of stairs climbed each day, 2) city blocks walked each day, and 3) sports (or recreational activity types) played in the past week25. From this information, a physical activity summary estimate, expressed in kilocalories per week (kcal·wk−1), was derived. With this questionnaire, they found that those who expended less than 2,000 kcal·wk−1 had a 64% higher risk of first MI when compared to the more active group (≥2000 kcal·wk−1)25. The investigators extended these findings by demonstrating an inverse dose-response association with risk of death up to a dose of 3,500 kcal·wk−1 (22% to 54% risk reduction) when compared to participants extending <500 kcal·wk−1 26.
Since then, the evidence has greatly expanded to document similar inverse associations of physical activity with cardiovascular risk factors, events, and disease in younger (children) or older age groups, women, and under-represented minority groups with many studies developing their own physical activity questionnaires (e.g., Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children27, CHAMPS Physical Activity Questionnaire28, Women’s Health Initiative Physical Activity Questionnaire29, and Modifiable Activity Questionnaire30). Most of these questionnaires are structured to elicit information on the frequency and duration of physical activity, either by using broad intensity categories or specific activity types, within a specified recall time frame. With information on frequency, duration, and intensity, summary estimates can be derived that are expressed as either kcal·wk−1 or metabolic equivalents of task (MET) minutes (or hours) per week (MET·min·wk−1), or min·wk−1 within broad intensity categories (e.g., moderate intensity min·wk−1). These are common summary estimates reported in the literature; however, there are deviations that do not represent the direct product of these physical activity characteristics (e.g., Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study [ARIC] Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire31, Coronary Artery Risk and Development in Young Adults [CARDIA] Physical Activity History32, Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children27)
Daily Accumulated Movement
Self-report methods are prone to error because of inaccurate recall, incomplete ascertainment (e.g., higher intensity, leisure-time physical activity), and prevarication bias33, which has led researchers to explore alternative assessment methods. In 1965, the Japanese Yamax company designed the 10,000 steps meter as 10,000 steps was thought to related to a reduced risk of CHD34. The step-counting technology improved in accuracy over time, and in the 1990’s the Digi-walker (DW-500) pedometer was released. Since then, step metrics, including steps per day and stepping rate (peak 30 minute or the highest number of steps accumulated over 30 minutes) have become acceptable estimates of physical activity volume and intensity.
As the step-counting technology in pedometers improved, researchers developed a type of wearable device that leveraged the acceleration and deceleration of the trunk to characterize human movement35; the characteristic of physical activity behavior36. In 1979, the Large-Scale Integrated Motor Activity Monitor (LSI) was developed to estimate physical activity in epidemiologic research37. The subsequent advancements in technology not only improved the accuracy of accelerometers, but also made this assessment method more feasible to implement in population-based studies38. This transition was perhaps stimulated by the implementation of the ActiGraph 7164 accelerometer into the 2003–04 and 2005–06 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles39. Since then, several large cardiovascular disease cohort studies including CARDIA (2005–06, 2015–16, and 2020–22) have supplemented report-based estimates of physical activity with accelerometry measures, including both research grade and consumer-based devices (e.g., Fitbit®). The continuous data sampling capabilities of accelerometers allow for derivation of more traditional estimates (e.g., moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) min·wk−1 using established threshold values applied to count data40) or novel estimates (e.g., activity fragmentation41).
Over seven decades of research, measurement methods have improved far beyond use of occupational categories to provide crude estimates of physical activity within a single domain (Table 2). Modern assessment strategies provide researchers with endless opportunities to derive more granular phenotypes of physical activity behavior to examine with cardiovascular risk and disease outcomes across the lifespan. In many instances, the selected assessment strategy is also used to elicit information on the prevalence of meeting (or not meeting) physical activity recommendations pertinent to each life stage (Table 3).
Table 2: Evolution of Physical Activity Measures in Research.
Representation of how physical activity research has progressed from quantifying an individual’s amount of physical activity by job type to wearable monitors.
| Occupation | Leisure | Transport | Household / Self-care | Assessment Method | Physical Activity Estimates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940–1950’s |
|
Job Type | Low, Moderate, High Active | |||
| 1960–1980’s |
|
|
|
Questionnaire | kcal·wk−1 MET·min·wk−1 min·wk−1 |
|
| 1990’s |
|
|
|
|
Questionnaire (sample specific) | kcal·wk−1 MET·min·wk−1 min·wk−1 |
| 1990’s |
|
|
|
|
Pedometer | steps·day−1 |
| 2000’s |
|
|
|
|
Accelerometer | counts· min·wk−1 min·wk−1 steps·day−1 novel metrics |
Table 3:
Summary of physical activity guidelines across the lifecourse
| Life stage | Recommendation | Source |
|---|---|---|
| In-utero | 150 min·wk−1 of moderate intensity physical activity for pregnant women | Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition3 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists157 |
| Infancy (<1 year) | 30 min·d−1 of prone position “tummy time” | World Health Organization158 |
| Early childhood (1–2 years) | 180 min·d−1 of any intensity physical activity | World Health Organization158 |
| Early childhood (3–4 years) | 180 min·d−1 of any intensity physical activity of which 60 minutes isif moderate-vigorous intensity | World Health Organization158 |
| School age children and adolescents (6–17 years) | 60 min·d−1 of moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity | Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition3 |
| Young adults (18–44 years) | 150–300 min·wk−1 of moderate intensity physical activity OR 75–150 min·wk−1 of vigorous intensity physical activity |
Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition3 |
| Midlife (45–64 years) | ||
| Older adults (≥65 years) |
min·wk−1 = minutes per week; min·d−1 = minutes per day
Despite continuous advances in strategies to assess physical activity and related constructs, there is not a perfect, “one-size fits all” method. Report-based assessments, including recall questionnaires, are widely available with minimal cost, but have associated limitations33. Further, while questionnaires have been developed, evaluated and used to estimate physical activity behavior in individuals of all ages, they have limited utility in young children (~8 years of age27) and those living with intellectual disabilities and cognitive impairment. Among these population sub-groups, proxy reports of physical activity are often obtained by parents and/or caregivers. Similar to report-based methods, device-based strategies also have limitations. For example, pedometers appear to be less accurate at slower gait speeds42, which is of particular relevance to children43 and older adults44. Commercial wearable accelerometers provide generally reliable estimates of step counts, yet are prone to undercounting steps in free living settings45, particularly among older adults46. Wearables are also less reliable in estimates of energy expenditure45 raising concerns about determining activity intensity. Research grade accelerometers more accurately estimate physical activity-related energy expenditure47 and/or daily accumulated time spent on intensity categories but are least accurate in detecting non-ambulatory physical activities (e.g., free-play in young children or tai chi in older adults) and are reliant on prediction equations and/or threshold-based approaches, for example.
Physical Activity and Prevention of CVD Across the Lifecourse
Throughout this review we have chosen to discuss levels of prevention using terminology from epidemiology (Table 1)49. Effective physical activity promotion at the population-level requires use of an ecologically-based multilevel framework incorporating aspects of land use, transportation, recreational, school, worksite, and home environments50. Thus, primordial prevention strategies require a strong partnership between communities, academia, government, non-profit, healthcare organizations, and for-profit organizations. In addition, strong partnerships with media and legislation (federal, state, and local) can also help facilitate these population-level strategies. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Move Your Way®51,52 campaign provides free tools and resources to promote the U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines for all people across all life stages and for health professionals to share with their patients, students, and communities. In 2020, the American Heart Association released a policy statement summarizing initiatives across federal, state, and local agencies to encourage creation of built environments to promote active transportation to encourage physical activity53,54. As such, primordial prevention strategies aimed to increase physical activity are relevant to all individuals, regardless of age, and should be at the forefront of CVD prevention efforts.
In-Utero
The prevention of CVD may begin as early as during fetal development. In addition to being pre-programmed by genetics, fetal development is reliant on the pregnant person’s health status, environment, and behaviors. Those with uncomplicated pregnancies can engage in aerobic and resistance exercise, but may need some modification, with a reduction in high exercise volumes and weight bearing exercise in late pregnancy. During any period of pregnancy, resistance exercise in the supine condition may not be recommended on the basis of low quality evidence from observational studies which suggested a potential increased risk of adverse events for the fetus55.
Primary prevention:
During fetal development, the circulatory system begins to take shape. Exercise during pregnancy has been shown to increase fetal heart rate variability and other favorable measures of autonomic function56. These benefits may persist after birth as infants born to persons who exercised had higher heart rate variability at one month of age57. Few studies have assessed these outcomes and, therefore, there is limited evidence supporting the role of prenatal exercise on development of the fetal cardiovascular system. Exercise during pregnancy also reduces the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, excess weight gain, preeclampsia, and preterm labor55. The fetal origins of disease hypothesis suggests that offspring exposed to exercise throughout gestation may have lower risk of developing diseases later in life, such as obesity and diabetes mellitus. But evidence supporting this hypothesis is lacking and confined to few observational studies58. We will need randomized controlled trials of exercise during pregnancy with long-term follow-up of the offspring in order to provide strong evidence for these suggested benefits.
Infancy and Early Childhood (birth to 5 years)
Infancy, encompassing birth to 12 months, is a period of rapid growth and development. By one year of age, birthweight has tripled. Major gross motor development milestones include rolling over around 6 months, crawling around 9 months, and pulling up to stand and first steps around 12 months. By the toddler period, 1 to 2 years of age, a child begins independently walking, jumping, and playing. Continued physical and motor skill development during early childhood, ages 3 to 5 years, or the ‘preschool years’, has many health implications59. Infants and young children are entirely reliant on care providers; thus, the home and childcare environment play important roles in physical activity levels at this life stage.
Congenital cardiovascular defects are estimated to affect 1% of U.S. infants each year60, increasing their risk for CVD. In addition to structural defects present at birth, birth weight can be associated with future CVD progression. A recent meta-analysis found birth weight has a U-shaped association with adulthood CVD. Infants of low birth weight (<2500 g) and high birth weight (>4000 g) have increased risk for CVD in adulthood61. Birth weight between 3000 to 4000 g had the lowest risk of future CVD. During infancy and early childhood, the development of fatty streaks (earliest visible stage of atherosclerosis characterized by lipid engorged macrophages and T lymphocytes in the intima) and the obesity trajectory begins62. Rapid weight gain during the first 2 years is associated with later obesity63. The prevalence of U.S. children under 2 years that have high weight for length (a measure of obesity) is ≈9%64. By preschool years, the prevalence of obesity is ≈14%64. The incidence rate for obesity is higher during early childhood than any other time in the lifecourse, and preschool-aged children living with overweight by age 5 years have four times the odds of obesity by adolescence than those with healthy weight65. Similarly, low birth weight, having a rising obesity trajectory through early childhood, and having obesity throughout early-to-late childhood increases odds of having hypertension in adolescence and young adulthood compared to a stable normal weight trajectory66. Preschool children living with overweight/obesity and low physical activity had 3.8 (95% CI: 1.6, 8.6) higher odds of elevated blood pressure compared to healthy weight, physically active preschool-aged children67. There were no significant differences in blood pressure among physically active preschool-aged children living with overweight/obesity or healthy weight preschool-aged children with low physical activity compared to healthy weight, physically active children67.
Primary prevention.
At this life stage, physical activity is paramount to combat pediatric obesity to decrease cardiometabolic risk factors and subsequent health outcomes. The direct association between physical activity and other CVD risk factors remains limited with evidence inconsistent68.
More research is needed to understand how early childhood physical activity may impact subclinical development of CVD. Birth cohorts should consider adding measurement of physical activity during infancy and early childhood, particularly device-based tools. Inflammatory markers for CVD are understudied in this life stage.
Childhood and Adolescence (6 to 17 years)
Childhood and adolescence are distinguished as the school-age period. Children continue to develop fine motor skills and by early adolescence may begin to play organized sports69. Increases in muscle mass, strength, and cardiorespiratory fitness continues during adolescent development69. For those living with congenital defects, there are guidelines in place for participation in competitive sports or high intensity training70; however with physician guidance, all ages should maintain active lifestyles71. At this age, home, school, and extracurricular activities are significant locations for physical activity and behavior is influenced by adults and their peers.
Among U.S. children and adolescents, the prevalence of elevated blood pressure is ≈15%72. Obesity is also a strong predictor of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), which is concerning, considering 1 in 5 U.S. children and adolescents have obesity64. Similarly, a large proportion of children and adolescents have elevated concentrations of lipids with ≈15% of children and ≈22% of adolescents having at least 1 adverse level of cholesterol (HDL, non-HDL, or total)73. Further, these risk factors can have an additive effect as the presence of two or more risk factors negatively impacts carotid IMT, however the combination of obesity and HDL was found to have the greatest influence on carotid IMT in children74. Prevention of obesity during this life stage is important given evidence that those experiencing obesity throughout this period had 5.2 times (95% CI: 4.5, 6.0) greater risk of having obesity into adulthood75. A systematic review of cardiorespiratory fitness in childhood found higher fitness is associated with favorable adiposity and cardiometabolic biomarkers76. However, the results were mixed, and the quality of the evidence was low. One explanation is the direct association of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness on carotid IMT has been found to be attenuated when controlling for regional adiposity77, therefore physical activity at this age is important in order to reduce risk of obesity and other cardiometabolic risk factors (e.g., blood pressure, lipid profile)13. Despite the benefits of physical activity, only 21 to 28% of children and adolescents meet the Physical Activity Guidelines recommendations78. Prevalence of activity varies by age, sex, disability status, weight status, and race/ethnicity. Adolescents, girls, youth with disabilities, youth with obesity, and Hispanic youth are less likely to meet guideline recommendations.
Primary prevention.
Childhood and adolescence are critical stages to prevent or delay risk factors that can accelerate development of CVD, including obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. For example, several blood pressure measurement indicators, including systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure, during childhood and adolescence are associated with adulthood carotid IMT79, a subclinical measure for early atherosclerosis and predictor of future MI and stroke80.
Secondary prevention.
FitnessGram®, a fitness assessment for youth implemented in U.S. schools,81 measures aerobic capacity (cardiorespiratory fitness; VO2 max), muscular strength, endurance, flexibility, and body composition (body mass index [BMI]). Using established age-gender cut points, youth are categorized into three categories: Healthy Fitness Zone, Needs Improvement, and Health Risk. Student reports and personalized feedback can help youth understand their health and future health risks if their fitness does not improve. Similar programs include the Presidential Youth Fitness Program82, which includes FitnessGram® assessments.
Much of the evidence base has been established using report-based methods, thus large-scale, device-based monitoring in this age group is still needed. More research on the benefits of muscle- and bone-strengthening activities for CVD progression is needed as well as longitudinal changes in physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness. More work is needed to reduce the overall decline in activity throughout this period of life.
Young Adulthood (18 to 44 years)
Young adulthood is characterized by many major life events, which may include moving away from home, school to work transition, partnerships (including marriage/cohabitation and dissolution/divorce), and becoming a parent83.
Although the prevalence of diabetes remains relatively low in young adults (3 to 5% of Americans), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently reported that prediabetes rates have reached 27.8% of young adults84. Studies in individuals with prediabetes, like the Diabetes Prevention Program, have shown that physical activity interventions (with and without a dietary component) improved glycemic control and reduced the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus85. Long-term adherence to lifestyle change is often more challenging, so further research should focus on improving the long-term effectiveness of intervention programs, especially in under-represented and underserved communities. Qualitative and community-engaged research may be important to understand the barriers to achieving physical activity recommendations and how to overcome these barriers.
Another risk factor with high prevalence in young adults is hypertension, affecting ≈25% of 20 to 40 year olds60. Meta-analyses of clinical trials including normotensive and hypertensive individuals suggest that aerobic exercise or a combination of aerobic and resistance training is expected to have an average effect of lowering systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3–4 mm Hg86. There is also strong observational evidence of a dose-response association of leisure time physical activity with a 6 to 33% lower risk of developing hypertension, depending on the level of physical activity3. Clinical trials consistently demonstrate the favorable effect of physical activity on lowering triglyceride levels and increasing HDL cholesterol, but evidence supporting a beneficial effect of physical activity on LDL cholesterol is less consistent3,86.
Primary prevention:
The major focus during young adulthood is the primary prevention of CVD risk factors86–88. Evidence supporting the association of physical activity with lower risk factors has come from both observational studies and clinical trials, as summarized in the Physical Activity Guidelines3. The evidence supporting physical activity in the prevention of weight gain is strongest in young adults, compared to middle and older ages. Finally, recent evidence in CARDIA highlights the importance of young adulthood physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness levels to reduce long-term risk of premature mortality and fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events89,90.
Tertiary prevention:
By the time most people enter adulthood, the early stages of CVD development, atherosclerosis, have already begun. One striking example comes from an autopsy study from the Korean war, which reported that >77% of soldiers (mean age 22 years) had atherosclerosis in their coronary arteries91,92. The prevalence of risk factors of CVD also begins to accumulate, especially as individuals near middle age. The first line treatment for many of these conditions is improving diet and physical activity, as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy86. Because the prevalence of primary risk factors for CVD is much higher in middle age, tertiary prevention strategies will be detailed in the next section, but its relevance first begins in the growing number of young adults already diagnosed with a chronic disease.
Longer follow-up will be necessary to establish the volume and intensities of physical activity that are required in young adulthood for optimal prevention of CVD that may not manifest clinically until older adulthood. This type of research may require follow-up periods lasting 40–50 years. We also look forward to future insights into precision physical activity and exercise prescription that may identify certain subgroups of the population (e.g., through genetics, subclinical biomarkers, environmental/lifestyle exposures, or responses to interventions) that may stand to benefit the most from certain types of training approaches.93
Middle Adulthood (45 to 64 years)
Middle adulthood can be a dynamic stage of life. Persons in this stage may experience several life events including residence related (e.g., relocation), employment related (e.g., loss of job, change of job), family related (e.g., change of partner, loss of partner or other family), and health related events (e.g., menopause, diagnosis of chronic illness, etc.)7.
Cardiovascular and cardiometabolic diseases are increasingly prevalent in this life stage (coronary artery disease >40%; diabetes ≈20%; hypertension ≈60%; severe obesity ≈10%)60,94–96. Atherosclerotic lesions become complex with calcifications, hemorrhage, and ulceration earlier in men whereas these developments are more common in postmenopausal women. These lesions may rupture and thrombose, leading to adverse events such as MI or stroke. Despite prevalent subclinical atherosclerotic disease, cardiovascular events resulting in hospitalization or death occur in just 0.7% of middle aged women and just over 1% of middle aged men97. Physical activity may slow disease progression and improve outcomes in the transition to older adulthood. In a study of masters age athletes (mean age 54 ± 9 years) with an average of >30 years participation in endurance sports, almost half of the athletes had a coronary artery calcium score of 098.
However, there is concern that excessive exercise may accelerate the atherosclerotic process99 or result in malignant cardiac remodeling100. A dose-dependent relationship appears to exist in exercise induced cardiac remodeling (EICR), with no apparent EICR observed in individuals who exercise within the Physical Activity Guidelines101. Endurance athletes may also be at increased risk for atrial fibrillation, data from a study of >52,000 participants (10% women) of a long-distance cross-country ski race showed greater risk of incident atrial fibrillation among those participants with ≥5 race finishes102. Further research is needed to determine whether excessive exercise is associated with long-term CVD morbidity and CVD-related mortality.
Whether the association between physical activity and CVD is modified by race or sex has been of particular interest. Analyses from ARIC and CARDIA observed no interaction by race (Black and White) on the association between physical activity and lower incidence of CVD, with a similar association seen in both races89,103. Regarding differences by sex, physical activity was associated with reduced all-cause and CVD-attributable mortality in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), but a reduction in incident CVD was only observed in men raising the question of whether there are sex-specific differences in risk factor modification and development of disease104. A later study from FHS utilizing a commercial wearable monitor (Apple watch) reported an association between greater physical activity and lower 10-year ASCVD risk in a sample of mostly women105. A report from the CARDIA study did not demonstrate differences between physical activity and premature CVD events across sex89. A large meta-analysis including 33 studies on >500,000 individuals, demonstrated sex-specific differences between physical activity and the risk of CHD, with women having greater benefits than men106. Overall, while the magnitude of benefit may vary by race or sex, the directionality of benefit is likely consistent across race and sex.
Physical activity can reduce the development of CVD risk factors in middle-aged adults. The highest rates of incident diabetes are in middle-age adults84. An analysis from the All of Us Research Program utilizing longitudinal measures of physical activity from commercial wearable devices reported an association between higher levels of physical activity and a lower risk of incident diabetes107. Analyses from CARDIA have suggested that physical activity in young adulthood with maintenance into middle adulthood may reduce incident hypertension and prevent premature cardiovascular events in middle-aged adults108. Reduction in heart failure risk with physical activity may be most effective in persons without established atherosclerotic disease109. Physical activity can reduce the development of CVD risk factors in middle-aged adults.
Several investigations have sought to unravel the importance of accumulated versus intensity-specific physical activity volume and their respective relations with CVD. In a study of >90,000 participants in the UK Biobank who wore a 7-day accelerometer, there were no observed differences in moderate versus vigorous intensity activity, and importantly, no threshold for the association with incident CVD110. This is in line with other reports111 indicating that any amount of physical activity has associative benefits and sedentary individuals may derive benefit from any increased amount of physical activity. However, other analyses from UK Biobank observed fewer CVD events among participants with greater proportions of MVPA (20% versus 10% of total energy expenditure)112 and a maximal reduction in CVD risk when vigorous activity accounted for 30% of total MVPA113. There may be differences across types of physical activities (e.g., aerobic versus resistance) in their associations with reduced incidence of CVD114. Physical activity does not need to be accumulated all at once, with findings suggesting intermittent physical activity throughout the day are associated with reduced all-cause and CVD-related mortality115. This can be important for those employed in primarily sedentary occupations.
The majority of studies have leveraged either self-reported questionnaire or device monitoring over a brief period (mostly 7 days). More research is needed to observe the associations of changes in physical activity over time on subsequent disease burden. Looking at physical activity patterns over time provides an opportunity to account for seasonal, environmental, or behavioral variation. A recent study using data from the All of Us Research Program found that daily step counts over a median 4 years of monitoring period had a significant inverse and non-linear relation with essential hypertension risk, with no further risk reduction beyond 8000 steps per day116. However, this analytical cohort was relatively young (median age 57 years), educated, and owned Fitbit devices, indicating the need for further studies to examine relation of physical activity over time with CVD in older, socioeconomically, and clinically diverse populations. Long-term physical activity is certainly associated with lower CVD risk, but initiation of physical activity in middle age may provide similar benefits and should be a goal for all individuals at this life stage117–119.
While higher levels of physical activity are associated with slower disease progression (and potentially regression of atherosclerosis120), it is important to recognize the “physical activity paradox” wherein leisure time physical activity is associated with clinical benefit, but occupational physical activity (i.e., manual labor) is not121,122. Holtermann and colleagues postulated on the reasons why this paradox exists123. They provide 6 hypotheses: (1) occupational physical activity may not be of sufficient duration or intensity; (2) it raises 24-hour heart rate; (3) heavy lifting and static positions elevate blood pressure; (4) there no recovery time; (5) workers cannot control their environment and may be subjected to detrimental climate extremes and dehydration; (6) sustained activity increases inflammation123. Socioeconomic status potentially confounds the relationship between occupational physical activity and CVD, with greater amounts of occupational physical activity observed among low socioeconomic groups124 who experience healthcare disparities and higher rates of unhealthy risk behaviors (smoking, diet, stress) which. may further attenuate the benefit from physical activity125. This may account, in part, for the discrepant findings of early studies of early studies of occupational physical activity (e.g., longshoreman22, bus drivers/conductors20) demonstrating a benefit of occupation-related physical activity and contemporary studies.
Secondary prevention:
Highly prevalent subclinical CVD places many middle-aged adults as targets for secondary and tertiary prevention efforts. Exercise stress testing is a mainstay for screening and diagnosis of CVD126. Using exercise as a physiologic stressor, electrocardiogram and blood pressure monitoring provide evaluation of cardiac response to exercise with modern implementations frequently employing additional cardiac imaging (echocardiography or nuclear scintigraphy) to enhance sensitivity and specificity. While submaximal stress tests may be used to guide an exercise prescription127, maximal stress tests are generally preferred for diagnostic and prognostic purposes126,128.
Tertiary prevention:
For those with established CVD, lifestyle modifications including diet, physical activity, weight management, and smoking cessation are foundational and often complemented by pharmacologic therapy. The 2012 Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Guidelines recommend 30 to 60 min·d−1 of moderate intensity activity129. Importantly, the safety of physical exercise in the presence of coronary artery calcification was examined and observed to not increase risk of CVD events (with a caveat that the study included no women)130. For those with advanced CVD, cardiac rehabilitation may be considered given its relation with improved functional capacity and mortality131–133. More information on cardiac rehabilitation is reported in the next section on older adulthood.
Significant research on physical activity associations with CVD has focused on middle-aged adults. This lends strength to the reported associations as they are replicated in multiple, distinct cohorts. These studies have relied primarily on self-reported measures of physical activity or time-limited assessments with a wearable device. Correlations between questionnaire-based assessments of physical activity and accelerometer-based assessments are modest134,135, and short-term accelerometer use may misclassify individuals’ degree of physical activity136. Further research may focus on using longitudinal, continuous measures of physical activity to further characterize patterns of physical activity. In addition, increased uptake of commercial, wearable devices in the population will allow for “real world” data, but may not be representative of the entire population137. Investigation into the interaction between physical activity and sleep patterns may yield meaningful insights into lifestyle.
Older Adulthood (≥65 years)
Older adulthood is a period where there are health-related events and transitions (e.g., increased risk of comorbidities such diabetes, cancer, osteoarthritis) and family and employment related transitions (e.g., loss of partner and retirement). These life events may have an impact on an individual’s ability to be active. If pre-existing chronic conditions limit activity, older adults can personalize the goal of being active as their ability and condition permit83.
As age advances, there are numerous functional cardiac changes, such as dysfunction related to systolic and diastolic blood pressure and electrical activity of the heart (arrhythmias), which in turn increases the cardiovascular risk. Within the older adult population, CVD and its primary risk factors are highly prevalent. Nearly, >65% have hypertension, ≈65% have clinical or subclinical CVD, ≈5–10% have atrial fibrillation, ≈10% have moderate-severe valve disease, and ≈5–10% have heart failure60,138. Engaging in any intensity of physical activity have been related to lower CVD risk139. Higher physical activity index score, which was a composite measure of participant reported time spent in different physical activities either at work or leisure and a weight based on the oxygen consumption at each activity type, was related to lower incidence of heart failure over average 10-year follow-up in 1,142 elderly FHS participants who did not have prior MI at baseline140. Similarly, in a 40 year follow-up of 4,729 participants in the FHS who were aged 30 to 60 years old at baseline, those who were active, which was assessed using surveys over 3 follow-up visits that were 14 to 16 years apart was associated with 17 to 19% lower CVD-attributable and all-cause mortality risk compared to those who were inactive104. In addition, a recent harmonized meta-analysis found older adults (≥60 years) who walked 6,000 to 9,000 steps per day had a 40 to 50% lower CVD risk, including heart attack, compared to those who walked <2,000 steps per day141. Similar findings are seen in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), which found among 4,207 older adults (mean age = 73 years) those who walked at least 49 blocks per week had a 36 to 47% lower risk of CHD, stroke, and CVD compared to those who walked less than 5 blocks per week142. These cohort studies highlight that engaging in any intensity of physical activity or taking more steps is related to better cardiovascular health in older adults. Further, it is known as adults age, they may have functional limitations143 such as slow gait speed, which might limit their ability to engage in physical activity. Particularly relevant to this challenge, is the observation that in older women shorter bouts of sedentary time associated with reduced risk of CVD events144. In turn, it is important to assess adult’s functionality and evaluate their physical and mental ability to engage in physical activity. Walking is considered low risk and a preferred physical activity among older adults142,145,146. Evidence suggest that leveraging wearable devices, consultation with healthcare professionals, and incorporating behavioral change components such as positive reinforcement messaging have shown to improve physical activity in adults with cardiovascular diseases147–149. However, further research is warranted in implementing interventions in sociodemographically diverse adults who may not have access to care or technology as well as limited health literacy.
Tertiary prevention:
Cardiac rehabilitation is multifaceted intervention, which includes exercise, lifestyle modification, diet, risk factor education, and psychological support. The goal of cardiac rehabilitation is to optimize the recovery and prevent future cardiac events. A study on 601,099 U.S. Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized for coronary conditions or cardiac revascularization has shown that mortality rates were 21 to 34% lower in socioeconomically and clinically diverse older adults who utilized cardiac rehabilitation versus those who did not150. Regardless of where cardiac rehabilitation is delivered (home vs. center), it has shown to be equally effective in improving clinical and functional outcomes among patients with heart failure, MI, atrial fibrillation, and cardiac surgery131–133. Despite these health benefits and coverage provided by Medicare, cardiac rehabilitation is under-utilized in older adults150. Thus, there is a need for future research to focus on identifying effective strategies to increase the utilization of cardiac rehabilitation among older adults.
Summary
Incorporating a lifecourse framework to the study of physical activity and its relation to CVD can provide meaningful insights. Certainly, physical activity has benefits, regardless of age. Yet, as we have shown, the goals and target levels of physical activity vary across life stages and findings are rarely contextualized using a lifecourse framework. A key knowledge gap, in this regard, is the relation of different trajectories of physical activity over the lifecourse (e.g., maintenance of physical activity from childhood to older adulthood versus an undulating pattern) with CVD. While it is likely not feasible to establish a birth cohort with repeated assessments through death, harmonizing data across several cohorts at different life stages may be a more realistic approach.
For example, based on the expert recommendations from the 1978 Bethesda Conference, CARDIA, ARIC, and CHS were initiated with each cohort reflecting an adult life-course stage (young, middle, and older adulthood, respectively). However, given inconsistencies in physical activity assessment tools used by these studies, additional methodological work is needed to harmonize and pool data to fully reflect physical activity changes across the adult life course, such as the Steps for Health Collaborative141,151. Another data harmonization example is the International Children’s Accelerometry Database (ICAD) which has pooled and harmonized over 37,000 raw accelerometer data files of children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years from 20 studies worldwide (Europe, U.S., Brazil, Australia)152. However, there are a paucity of CVD cohort studies that integrate earlier life-course stages (e.g., infancy to adolescence) with the adult studies. Cohort studies should consider adding offspring ancillary studies to examine physical activity across life-course stages, such as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)153 and the Framingham Offspring Study154. With the advent of the “quantified self,” an exponential growth in the amount of quantified, longitudinal physical activity data opens opportunities to resolve several unanswered questions155. A central question revolves around 24-hour patterns of physical activity (e.g., sleep, sedentary behavior) and how they may modify the association of physical activity with CVD. Separately, what role do genetic variants play in determining an individual’s ideal amount and intensity of physical activity?
Finally, the pivotal role of individual choice cannot be understated. While it is generally well-established that physical activity improves cardiovascular health and longevity, there is prevalent cognitive dissonance manifested by the almost universal disparities between the Physical Activity Guidelines and reported physical activity. For many, the delay between physical inactivity and incident CVD reduces the motivation to exercise. For others with established CVD, a feeling of futility may prohibit engagement. At the same time, we acknowledge systemic factors heavily influence individual choice. Significant barriers to physical activity exist for large portions of the population, including social and environmental factors. Given the impact of early exposure and training, we are excited to see efforts aimed to increase physical activity in children and youth156. Further investigation into how to increase physical activity at an individual and population level are urgently needed to optimize cardiovascular health across the lifecourse.
Disclosures
ASP & HM None
NLS received funding from Novo Nordisk for an investigator-initiated research grant unrelated to the current project.
ELB received funding from United Therapeutics for an investigator-initiated research grant unrelated to the current project.
EED & KPG received funding from NHLBI grant R01 HL149796 from the CARDIA Activity and Heart Failure Study (Pettee Gabriel [PI]).
References:
- 1.Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L, Greenlund K, Daniels S, Nichol G, Tomaselli GF, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121:586–613. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Labarthe DR, Kubzansky LD, Boehm JK, Lloyd-Jones DM, Berry JD, Seligman MEP. Positive Cardiovascular Health: A Timely Convergence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:860–867. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lloyd-Jones DM, Allen NB, Anderson CAM, Black T, Brewer LC, Foraker RE, Grandner MA, Lavretsky H, Perak AM, Sharma G, et al. Life’s Essential 8: Updating and Enhancing the American Heart Association’s Construct of Cardiovascular Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;146:e18–e43. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Adult participation in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities--United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62:326–330. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lynch J, Hallqvist J, Power C. Life course epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:778–783. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.10.778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Allender S, Hutchinson L, Foster C. Life-change events and participation in physical activity: a systematic review. Health Promot Int. 2008;23:160–172. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Allender S, Cowburn G, Foster C. Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:826–835. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bowden Davies KA, Sprung VS, Norman JA, Thompson A, Mitchell KL, Halford JCG, Harrold JA, Wilding JPH, Kemp GJ, Cuthbertson DJ. Short-term decreased physical activity with increased sedentary behaviour causes metabolic derangements and altered body composition: effects in individuals with and without a first-degree relative with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2018;61:1282–1294. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4603-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mielke GI. Relevance of Life Course Epidemiology for Research on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19:225–226. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Milei J, Grana DR, Navari C, Azzato F, Guerri-Guttenberg RA, Ambrosio G. Coronary intimal thickening in newborn babies and <or=1-year-old infants. Angiology. 2010;61:350–356. doi: 10.1177/0003319709352487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laufs U, Wassmann S, Czech T, Münzel T, Eisenhauer M, Böhm M, Nickenig G. Physical inactivity increases oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:809–814. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000158311.24443.af [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular H, Risk Reduction in C, Adolescents, National Heart L, Blood I. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics. 2011;128 Suppl 5:S213–256. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2107C [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bertoni AG, Whitt-Glover MC, Chung H, Le KY, Barr RG, Mahesh M, Jenny NS, Burke GL, Jacobs DR. The association between physical activity and subclinical atherosclerosis: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:444–454. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Diaz KM, Shimbo D. Physical Activity and the Prevention of Hypertension. Current Hypertension Reports. 2013;15:659–668. doi: 10.1007/s11906-013-0386-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Diaz KM, Booth JN 3rd, Seals SR, Abdalla M, Dubbert PM, Sims M, Ladapo JA, Redmond N, Muntner P, Shimbo D. Physical Activity and Incident Hypertension in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study. Hypertension. 2017;69:421–427. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stanford KI, Goodyear LJ. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: molecular mechanisms regulating glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. Adv Physiol Educ. 2014;38:308–314. doi: 10.1152/advan.00080.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Muscella A, Stefano E, Marsigliante S. The effects of exercise training on lipid metabolism and coronary heart disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319:H76–H88. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00708.2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee IM. Epidemiologic methods in physical activity studies. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Morris J, Heady JA, Raffle PAB, Roberts CG, Parks JW. Coronary heart disease and physical activity of work. Lancet. 1953;265:1053–1057, 1111–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Taylor HL, Klepetar E, Keys A, Parlin W, Blackburn H, Puchner T. Death rates among physically active and sedentary employees of the railroad industry. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1962;52:1697–1707. doi: 10.2105/ajph.52.10.1697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paffenbarger RS Jr., Laughlin ME, Gima AS, Black RA. Work activity of longshoremen as related to death from coronary heart disease and stroke. N Engl J Med. 1970;282:1109–1114. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197005142822001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Paffenbarger RS Jr., Blair SN, Lee IM. A history of physical activity, cardiovascular health and longevity: the scientific contributions of Jeremy N Morris, DSc, DPH, FRCP. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:1184–1192. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.5.1184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kriska A. Ethnic and cultural issues in assessing physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71:S47–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Paffenbarger RS Jr., Wing AL, Hyde RT. Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108:161–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Paffenbarger RS Jr., Hyde RT, Wing AL, Hsieh CC. Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:605–613. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198603063141003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Janz KF, Lutuchy EM, Wenthe P, Levy SM. Measuring activity in children and adolescents using self-report: PAQ-C and PAQ-A. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:767–772. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181620ed1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1126–1141. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200107000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Meyer AM, Evenson KR, Morimoto L, Siscovick D, White E. Test-retest reliability of the Women’s Health Initiative physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:530–538. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818ace55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kriska AM, Knowler WC, LaPorte RE, Drash AL, Wing RR, Blair SN, Bennett PH, Kuller LH. Development of questionnaire to examine relationship of physical activity and diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:401–411. doi: 10.2337/diacare.13.4.401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Richardson MT, Ainsworth BE, Wu HC, Jacobs DR Jr., Leon AS. Ability of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC)/Baecke Questionnaire to assess leisure-time physical activity. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:685–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gabriel KP, Sidney S, Jacobs DR Jr., Quesenberry CP Jr., Reis JP, Jiang SF, Sternfeld B. Convergent validity of a brief self-reported physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:1570–1577. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Troiano RP, Pettee Gabriel KK, Welk GJ, Owen N, Sternfeld B. Reported physical activity and sedentary behavior: why do you ask? J Phys Act Health. 2012;9 Suppl 1:S68–75. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.s1.s68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bassett DR Jr., Toth LP, LaMunion SR, Crouter SE. Step Counting: A Review of Measurement Considerations and Health-Related Applications. Sports Med. 2017;47:1303–1315. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0663-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Montoye HJ, Washburn R, Servais S, Ertl A, Webster JG, Nagle FJ. Estimation of energy expenditure by a portable accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15:403–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pettee Gabriel KK, Morrow JR Jr., Woolsey AL. Framework for physical activity as a complex and multidimensional behavior. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9 Suppl 1:S11–18. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.s1.s11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.LaPorte RE, Kuller LH, Kupfer DJ, McPartland RJ, Matthews G, Caspersen C. An objective measure of physical activity for epidemiologic research. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;109:158–168. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Chen KY. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1019–1023. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:181–188. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:777–781. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schrack JA, Kuo PL, Wanigatunga AA, Di J, Simonsick EM, Spira AP, Ferrucci L, Zipunnikov V. Active-to-Sedentary Behavior Transitions, Fatigability, and Physical Functioning in Older Adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74:560–567. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dondzila CJ, Swartz AM, Miller NE, Lenz EK, Strath SJ. Accuracy of uploadable pedometers in laboratory, overground, and free-living conditions in young and older adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2012;9:143. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mitre N, Lanningham-Foster L, Foster R, Levine JA. Pedometer Accuracy for Children: Can We Recommend Them for Our Obese Population? Pediatrics. 2009;123:e127–e131. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Martin JB, Krc KM, Mitchell EA, Eng JJ, Noble JW. Pedometer accuracy in slow walking older adults. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2012;19:387–393. doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.7.387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, Orychock K, Tobin MA, Simango B, Buote R, Van Heerden D, Luan H, Cullen K, et al. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8:e18694. doi: 10.2196/18694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Modave F, Guo Y, Bian J, Gurka MJ, Parish A, Smith MD, Lee AM, Buford TW. Mobile Device Accuracy for Step Counting Across Age Groups. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5:e88. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.O’Driscoll R, Turicchi J, Hopkins M, Gibbons C, Larsen SC, Palmeira AL, Heitmann BL, Horgan GW, Finlayson G, Stubbs RJ. The validity of two widely used commercial and research-grade activity monitors, during resting, household and activity behaviours. Health and Technology. 2020;10:637–648. doi: 10.1007/s12553-019-00392-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kowalski KC, Crocker PR, Donen RM. The physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C) and adolescents (PAQ-A) manual. College of kinesiology, university of saskatchewan. 2004;87:1–38. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kisling LA, J MD. Prevention Strategies. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL); 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bevington F, Piercy KL, Olscamp K, Hilfiker SW, Fisher DG, Barnett EY. The Move Your Way Campaign: Encouraging Contemplators and Families to Meet the Recommendations From the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. J Phys Act Health. 2020;17:397–403. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Move Your Way Community Resources. https://health.gov/our-work/nutrition-physical-activity/move-your-way-community-resources.
- 53.Young DR, Cradock AL, Eyler AA, Fenton M, Pedroso M, Sallis JF, Whitsel LP, American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating C. Creating Built Environments That Expand Active Transportation and Active Living Across the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142:e167–e183. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.In: Step It Up! The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Promote Walking and Walkable Communities. Washington (DC); 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bauer I, Hartkopf J, Kullmann S, Schleger F, Hallschmid M, Pauluschke-Fröhlich J, Fritsche A, Preissl H. Spotlight on the fetus: how physical activity during pregnancy influences fetal health: a narrative review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020;6:e000658. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.May LE, Allen JJ, Gustafson KM. Fetal and maternal cardiac responses to physical activity and exercise during pregnancy. Early Hum Dev. 2016;94:49–52. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.May LE, Scholtz SA, Suminski R, Gustafson KM. Aerobic exercise during pregnancy influences infant heart rate variability at one month of age. Early Hum Dev. 2014;90:33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kusuyama J, Alves-Wagner AB, Makarewicz NS, Goodyear LJ. Effects of maternal and paternal exercise on offspring metabolism. Nat Metab. 2020;2:858–872. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-00274-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Timmons BW, Leblanc AG, Carson V, Connor Gorber S, Dillman C, Janssen I, Kho ME, Spence JC, Stearns JA, Tremblay MS. Systematic review of physical activity and health in the early years (aged 0–4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:773–792. doi: 10.1139/h2012-070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, Carson AP, Commodore-Mensah Y, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145:e153–e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mohseni R, Mohammed SH, Safabakhsh M, Mohseni F, Monfared ZS, Seyyedi J, Mejareh ZN, Alizadeh S. Birth Weight and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Adulthood: a Dose-Response Meta-analysis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020;22:12. doi: 10.1007/s11883-020-0829-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hong YM. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beginning in childhood. Korean Circ J. 2010;40:1–9. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2010.40.1.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zheng M, Lamb KE, Grimes C, Laws R, Bolton K, Ong KK, Campbell K. Rapid weight gain during infancy and subsequent adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence. Obes Rev. 2018;19:321–332. doi: 10.1111/obr.12632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Martin CB, Freedman DS, Carroll MD, Gu Q, Hales CM. Trends in Obesity Prevalence by Race and Hispanic Origin-1999–2000 to 2017–2018. JAMA. 2020;324:1208–1210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Boelsen-Robinson T, Gearon E, Peeters A. Incidence of childhood obesity in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1659–1661. doi: 10.1056/nejmc1402397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Huang RC, Burrows S, Mori TA, Oddy WH, Beilin LJ. Lifecourse Adiposity and Blood Pressure Between Birth and 17 Years Old. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28:1056–1063. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Vale S, Trost SG, Rêgo C, Abreu S, Mota J. Physical Activity, Obesity Status, and Blood Pressure in Preschool Children. J Pediatr. 2015;167:98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.04.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bell LA, Fletcher EA, Timperio A, Vuillermin P, Hesketh K. Preschool children’s physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22:568–573. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Patel DR, Pratt HD, Greydanus DE. Pediatric neurodevelopment and sports participation. When are children ready to play sports? Pediatr Clin North Am. 2002;49:505–531, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(02)00003-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Graham TP Jr., Driscoll DJ, Gersony WM, Newburger JW, Rocchini A, Towbin JA. Task Force 2: congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1326–1333. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Longmuir PE, Brothers JA, de Ferranti SD, Hayman LL, Van Hare GF, Matherne GP, Davis CK, Joy EA, McCrindle BW, American Heart Association Atherosclerosis H, et al. Promotion of physical activity for children and adults with congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:2147–2159. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318293688f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kit BK, Kuklina E, Carroll MD, Ostchega Y, Freedman DS, Ogden CL. Prevalence of and trends in dyslipidemia and blood pressure among US children and adolescents, 1999–2012. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:272–279. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Perak AM, Ning H, Kit BK, de Ferranti SD, Van Horn LV, Wilkins JT, Lloyd-Jones DM. Trends in Levels of Lipids and Apolipoprotein B in US Youths Aged 6 to 19 Years, 1999–2016. JAMA. 2019;321:1895–1905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.White D, Place R, Michael T, Hoffman E, Gordon PM, Visich P. The Relationship between Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Children. J Pediatr. 2017;190:38–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.07.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Simmonds M, Llewellyn A, Owen CG, Woolacott N. Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17:95–107. doi: 10.1111/obr.12334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lang JJ, Belanger K, Poitras V, Janssen I, Tomkinson GR, Tremblay MS. Systematic review of the relationship between 20m shuttle run performance and health indicators among children and youth. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21:383–397. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Melo X, Santa-Clara H, Pimenta NM, Martins SS, Minderico CS, Fernhall B, Sardinha LB. Intima-Media Thickness in 11- to 13-Year-Old Children: Variation Attributed to Sedentary Behavior, Physical Activity, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Waist Circumference. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12:610–617. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.U.S. REPORT CARD RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE. The 2022 United States Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth. Available at https://paamovewithus.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022-US-Report-Card-on-Physical-Activity-for-Children-and-Youth.pdf.
- 79.Koskinen J, Juonala M, Dwyer T, Venn A, Petkeviciene J, Ceponiene I, Bazzano L, Chen W, Sabin MA, Burns TL, et al. Utility of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Components in Childhood to Predict Adult Carotid Intima-Media Thickness. Hypertension. 2019;73:335–341. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, Rosvall M, Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2007;115:459–467. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.https://fitnessgram.net Accessed 15 March 2023.
- 82.Presidential Youth Fitness Program. https://www.pyfp.org Accessed 15 March 2023.
- 83.Gropper H, John JM, Sudeck G, Thiel A. The impact of life events and transitions on physical activity: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0234794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html. Accessed 3 February 2023.
- 85.Kerrison G, Gillis RB, Jiwani SI, Alzahrani Q, Kok S, Harding SE, Shaw I, Adams GG. The Effectiveness of Lifestyle Adaptation for the Prevention of Prediabetes in Adults: A Systematic Review. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:8493145. doi: 10.1155/2017/8493145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Barone Gibbs B, Hivert M-F, Jerome GJ, Kraus WE, Rosenkranz SK, Schorr EN, Spartano NL, Lobelo F, American Heart Association Council on L, Cardiometabolic H, et al. Physical Activity as a Critical Component of First-Line Treatment for Elevated Blood Pressure or Cholesterol: Who, What, and How?: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2021;78:e26–e37. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fulghum K, Hill BG. Metabolic Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Cardiac Remodeling. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:127. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Daniela M, Catalina L, Ilie O, Paula M, Daniel-Andrei I, Ioana B. Effects of Exercise Training on the Autonomic Nervous System with a Focus on Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidants Effects. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nagata JM, Vittinghoff E, Gabriel KP, Rana JS, Garber AK, Moran AE, Reis JP, Lewis CE, Sidney S, Bibbins-Domingo K. Physical activity from young adulthood to middle age and premature cardiovascular disease events: a 30-year population-based cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19:123. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01357-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pettee Gabriel K, Jaeger BC, Lewis CE, Sidney S, Dooley EE, Carnethon MR, Jacobs DR Jr., Hornikel B, Reis JP, Schreiner PJ, et al. Analysis of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Early Adulthood and Midlife With All-Cause Mortality and Fatal or Nonfatal Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e230842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Enos WF, Holmes RH, Beyer J. Coronary disease among United States soldiers killed in action in Korea; preliminary report. J Am Med Assoc. 1953;152:1090–1093. doi: 10.1001/jama.1953.03690120006002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.McNamara JJ, Molot MA, Stremple JF, Cutting RT. Coronary artery disease in combat casualties in Vietnam. JAMA. 1971;216:1185–1187. doi: 10.1001/jama.1971.03180330061012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ramirez-Velez R, Izquierdo M. Editorial: Precision Physical Activity and Exercise Prescriptions for Disease Prevention: The Effect of Interindividual Variability Under Different Training Approaches, Volume II. Front Physiol. 2021;12:831403. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.831403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 Prepandemic Data Files Development of Files and Prevalence Estimates for Selected Health Outcomes. In: National Center for Health S, ed. National Health Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, MD: 10.15620/cdc:106273; 2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bergstrom G, Persson M, Adiels M, Bjornson E, Bonander C, Ahlstrom H, Alfredsson J, Angeras O, Berglund G, Blomberg A, et al. Prevalence of Subclinical Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis in the General Population. Circulation. 2021;144:916–929. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ibanez B, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Fernandez-Friera L, Garcia-Lunar I, Andres V, Fuster V. Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis (PESA) Study: JACC Focus Seminar 7/8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:156–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ritchey MD, Loustalot F, Wall HK, Steiner CA, Gillespie C, George MG, Wright JS. Million Hearts: Description of the National Surveillance and Modeling Methodology Used to Monitor the Number of Cardiovascular Events Prevented During 2012–2016. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Merghani A, Maestrini V, Rosmini S, Cox AT, Dhutia H, Bastiaenan R, David S, Yeo TJ, Narain R, Malhotra A, et al. Prevalence of Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease in Masters Endurance Athletes With a Low Atherosclerotic Risk Profile. Circulation. 2017;136:126–137. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Aengevaeren VL, Mosterd A, Sharma S, Prakken NHJ, Möhlenkamp S, Thompson PD, Velthuis BK, Eijsvogels TMH. Exercise and Coronary Atherosclerosis: Observations, Explanations, Relevance, and Clinical Management. Circulation. 2020;141:1338–1350. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.La Gerche A, Burns AT, Mooney DJ, Inder WJ, Taylor AJ, Bogaert J, Macisaac AI, Heidbuchel H, Prior DL. Exercise-induced right ventricular dysfunction and structural remodelling in endurance athletes. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:998–1006. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Dawes TJ, Corden B, Cotter S, de Marvao A, Walsh R, Ware JS, Cook SA, O’Regan DP. Moderate Physical Activity in Healthy Adults Is Associated With Cardiac Remodeling. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e004712. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Andersen K, Farahmand B, Ahlbom A, Held C, Ljunghall S, Michaelsson K, Sundstrom J. Risk of arrhythmias in 52 755 long-distance cross-country skiers: a cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3624–3631. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Bell EJ, Lutsey PL, Windham BG, Folsom AR. Physical activity and cardiovascular disease in African Americans in Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:901–907. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827d87ec [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Shortreed SM, Peeters A, Forbes AB. Estimating the effect of long-term physical activity on cardiovascular disease and mortality: evidence from the Framingham Heart Study. Heart. 2013;99:649–654. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lin H, Sardana M, Zhang Y, Liu C, Trinquart L, Benjamin EJ, Manders ES, Fusco K, Kornej J, Hammond MM, et al. Association of Habitual Physical Activity With Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Circ Res. 2020;127:1253–1260. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding EL, Kohl HW 3rd, Haskell W, Lee IM. Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2011;124:789–795. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Perry AS, Annis JS, Master H, Nayor M, Hughes A, Kouame A, Natarajan K, Marginean K, Murthy V, Roden DM, et al. Association of longitudinal activity measures and diabetes risk: an analysis from the NIH All of Us Research Program. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Nagata JM, Vittinghoff E, Pettee Gabriel K, Garber AK, Moran AE, Sidney S, Rana JS, Reis JP, Bibbins-Domingo K. Physical Activity and Hypertension From Young Adulthood to Middle Age. Am J Prev Med. 2021;60:757–765. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Florido R, Kwak L, Lazo M, Michos ED, Nambi V, Blumenthal RS, Gerstenblith G, Palta P, Russell SD, Ballantyne CM, et al. Physical Activity and Incident Heart Failure in High-Risk Subgroups: The ARIC Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e014885. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Ramakrishnan R, Doherty A, Smith-Byrne K, Rahimi K, Bennett D, Woodward M, Walmsley R, Dwyer T. Accelerometer measured physical activity and the incidence of cardiovascular disease: Evidence from the UK Biobank cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021;18:e1003487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, Hansen BH, Jefferis B, Fagerland MW, Whincup P, Diaz KM, Hooker SP, Chernofsky A, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Dempsey PC, Rowlands AV, Strain T, Zaccardi F, Dawkins N, Razieh C, Davies MJ, Khunti KK, Edwardson CL, Wijndaele K, et al. Physical activity volume, intensity, and incident cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:4789–4800. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Mu X, Liu S, Fu M, Luo M, Ding D, Chen L, Yu K. Associations of physical activity intensity with incident cardiovascular diseases and mortality among 366,566 UK adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2022;19:151. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01393-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Porter AK, Schilsky S, Evenson KR, Florido R, Palta P, Holliday KM, Folsom AR. The Association of Sport and Exercise Activities With Cardiovascular Disease Risk: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16:698–705. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Stamatakis E, Ahmadi MN, Gill JMR, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Gibala MJ, Doherty A, Hamer M. Association of wearable device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity with mortality. Nat Med. 2022;28:2521–2529. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02100-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Master H, Annis J, Huang S, Beckman JA, Ratsimbazafy F, Marginean K, Carroll R, Natarajan K, Harrell FE, Roden DM, et al. Association of step counts over time with the risk of chronic disease in the All of Us Research Program. Nat Med. 2022;28:2301–2308. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02012-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Saint-Maurice PF, Coughlan D, Kelly SP, Keadle SK, Cook MB, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Matthews CE. Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity Across the Adult Life Course With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e190355. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Cowan LT, Tome J, Mallhi AK, Tarasenko YN, Palta P, Evenson KR, Lakshminarayan K. Changes in physical activity and risk of ischemic stroke: The ARIC study. Int J Stroke. 2023;18:173–179. doi: 10.1177/17474930221094221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Florido R, Kwak L, Lazo M, Nambi V, Ahmed HM, Hegde SM, Gerstenblith G, Blumenthal RS, Ballantyne CM, Selvin E, et al. Six-Year Changes in Physical Activity and the Risk of Incident Heart Failure: ARIC Study. Circulation. 2018;137:2142–2151. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hambrecht R, Niebauer J, Marburger C, Grunze M, Kälberer B, Hauer K, Schlierf G, Kübler W, Schuler G. Various intensities of leisure time physical activity in patients with coronary artery disease: effects on cardiorespiratory fitness and progression of coronary atherosclerotic lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:468–477. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90051-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Holtermann A, Schnohr P, Nordestgaard BG, Marott JL. The physical activity paradox in cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the contemporary Copenhagen General Population Study with 104 046 adults. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1499–1511. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Luo M, Gupta N, Holtermann A, Stamatakis E, Ding D. Revisiting the ‘physical activity paradox’ in a Chinese context: Occupational physical activity and mortality in 142,302 urban working adults from the China Kadoorie Biobank study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022;23:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Holtermann A, Krause N, van der Beek AJ, Straker L. The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:149–150. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Beenackers MA, Kamphuis CBM, Giskes K, Brug J, Kunst AE, Burdorf A, van Lenthe FJ. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2012;9:116. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Birch S, Jerrett M, Eyles J. Heterogeneity in the determinants of health and illness: the example of socioeconomic status and smoking. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:307–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Fletcher GF, Ades PA, Kligfield P, Arena R, Balady GJ, Bittner VA, Coke LA, Fleg JL, Forman DE, Gerber TC, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128:873–934. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829b5b44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Gappmaier E The Submaximal Clinical Exercise Tolerance Test (SXTT) to Establish Safe Exercise Prescription Parameters for Patients with Chronic Disease and Disability. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012;23:19–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Makani H, Bangalore S, Halpern D, Makwana HG, Chaudhry FA. Cardiac outcomes with submaximal normal stress echocardiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1393–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, Douglas PS, Foody JM, Gerber TC, Hinderliter AL, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012;126:e354–471. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318277d6a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.DeFina LF, Radford NB, Barlow CE, Willis BL, Leonard D, Haskell WL, Farrell SW, Pavlovic A, Abel K, Berry JD, et al. Association of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality With High Levels of Physical Activity and Concurrent Coronary Artery Calcification. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:174–181. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Anderson L, Sharp GA, Norton RJ, Dalal H, Dean SG, Jolly K, Cowie A, Zawada A, Taylor RS. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD007130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007130.pub4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Buckley BJR, Harrison SL, Fazio-Eynullayeva E, Underhill P, Lane DA, Thijssen DHJ, Lip GYH. Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation and All-Cause Mortality Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e020804. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Eijsvogels TMH, Maessen MFH, Bakker EA, Meindersma EP, van Gorp N, Pijnenburg N, Thompson PD, Hopman MTE. Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation With All-Cause Mortality Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease in the Netherlands. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2011686. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Sabia S, van Hees VT, Shipley MJ, Trenell MI, Hagger-Johnson G, Elbaz A, Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A. Association between questionnaire- and accelerometer-assessed physical activity: the role of sociodemographic factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179:781–790. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Guo W, Key TJ, Reeves GK. Accelerometer compared with questionnaire measures of physical activity in relation to body size and composition: a large cross-sectional analysis of UK Biobank. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Chaudhry UAR, Wahlich C, Fortescue R, Cook DG, Knightly R, Harris T. The effects of step-count monitoring interventions on physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based randomised controlled trials in adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:129. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01020-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Omura JD, Carlson SA, Paul P, Watson KB, Fulton JE. National physical activity surveillance: Users of wearable activity monitors as a potential data source. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2017;5:124–126. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. the Tromsø study. Heart. 2013;99:396–400. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Länsitie M, Kangas M, Jokelainen J, Venojärvi M, Timonen M, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Korpelainen R. Cardiovascular disease risk and all-cause mortality associated with accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time ‒ a prospective population-based study in older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:729. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03414-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Kraigher-Krainer E, Lyass A, Massaro JM, Lee DS, Ho JE, Levy D, Kannel WB, Vasan RS. Association of physical activity and heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in the elderly: the Framingham Heart Study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15:742–746. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Paluch AE, Bajpai S, Ballin M, Bassett DR, Buford TW, Carnethon MR, Chernofsky A, Dooley EE, Ekelund U, Evenson KR, et al. Prospective Association of Daily Steps With Cardiovascular Disease: A Harmonized Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2023;147:122–131. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Soares-Miranda L, Siscovick DS, Psaty BM, Longstreth WT Jr., Mozaffarian D. Physical Activity and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation. 2016;133:147–155. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Colon-Emeric CS, Whitson HE, Pavon J, Hoenig H. Functional decline in older adults. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88:388–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Bellettiere J, LaMonte MJ, Evenson KR, Rillamas-Sun E, Kerr J, Lee IM, Di C, Rosenberg DE, Stefanick M, Buchner DM, et al. Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease in older women: The Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health (OPACH) Study. Circulation. 2019;139:1036–1046. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Hanson S, Jones A. Is there evidence that walking groups have health benefits? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:710–715. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Valenti G, Bonomi AG, Westerterp KR. Walking as a Contributor to Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: 2 Week Longitudinal Study Using Accelerometry and the Doubly Labeled Water Method. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4:e56. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Martin SS, Feldman DI, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR, Post WS, McKibben RA, Michos ED, Ndumele CE, Ratchford EV, Coresh J, et al. mActive: A Randomized Clinical Trial of an Automated mHealth Intervention for Physical Activity Promotion. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ferguson T, Olds T, Curtis R, Blake H, Crozier AJ, Dankiw K, Dumuid D, Kasai D, O’Connor E, Virgara R, et al. Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e615–e626. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00111-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Hodkinson A, Kontopantelis E, Adeniji C, van Marwijk H, McMillian B, Bower P, Panagioti M. Interventions Using Wearable Physical Activity Trackers Among Adults With Cardiometabolic Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2116382. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Suaya JA, Stason WB, Ades PA, Normand S-LT, Shepard DS. Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Paluch AE, Bajpai S, Bassett DR, Carnethon MR, Ekelund U, Evenson KR, Galuska DA, Jefferis BJ, Kraus WE, Lee IM, et al. Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7:e219–e228. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00302-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Sherar LB, Griew P, Esliger DW, Cooper AR, Ekelund U, Judge K, Riddoch C. International children’s accelerometry database (ICAD): design and methods. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:485. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Golding J, Pembrey M, Jones R, Team AS. ALSPAC--the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. I. Study methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:74–87. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00325.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;110:281–290. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Dulaud P, Di Loreto I, Mottet D. Self-Quantification Systems to Support Physical Activity: From Theory to Implementation Principles. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Santos-Beneit G, Fernandez-Jimenez R, de Cos-Gandoy A, Rodriguez C, Carral V, Bodega P, de Miguel M, Orrit X, Haro D, Penalvo JL, et al. Lessons Learned From 10 Years of Preschool Intervention for Health Promotion: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:283–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 804. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e178–e188. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Guidelines on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep for Children under 5 Years of Age. Geneva: World Health Organization. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
