Abstract
Tendons are tension-bearing tissues transmitting force from muscle to bone for body movement. This mechanical loading is essential for tendon development, homeostasis, and healing after injury. While Ca2+ signaling has been studied extensively for its roles in mechanotransduction, regulating muscle, bone and cartilage development and homeostasis, knowledge about Ca2+ signaling and the source of Ca2+ signals in tendon fibroblast biology are largely unknown. Here, we investigated the function of Ca2+ signaling through CaV1.2 voltage-gated Ca2+ channel in tendon formation. Using a reporter mouse, we found that CaV1.2 is highly expressed in tendon during development and downregulated in adult homeostasis. To assess its function, we generated ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice that express a gain-of-function mutant CaV1.2 in tendon. We found that mutant tendons were hypertrophic, with more tendon fibroblasts but decreased cell density. TEM analyses demonstrated increased collagen fibrillogenesis in the hypertrophic tendons. Biomechanical testing revealed that the hypertrophic tendons display higher peak load and stiffness, with no changes in peak stress and elastic modulus. Proteomics analysis showed no significant difference in the abundance of type I and III collagens, but mutant tendons had about 2-fold increase in other ECM proteins such as tenascin C, tenomodulin, periostin, type XIV and type VIII collagens, around 11-fold increase in the growth factor myostatin, and significant elevation of matrix remodeling proteins including Mmp14, Mmp2 and cathepsin K. Taken together, these data highlight roles for increased Ca2+ signaling through CaV1.2 on regulating expression of myostatin growth factor and ECM proteins for tendon collagen fibrillogenesis during tendon formation.
Keywords: Tendon, Ca2+ signal, CaV1.2, fibrillogenesis, hypertrophy, biomechanical
Graphical Abstract

We find a voltage-gated Ca2+ channel CaV1.2 functions in non-excitable tendon tissue during tendon development and postnatal growth. Using a transgenic mouse model, modulating Ca2+ signaling through a gain-of-function G406R CaV1.2 mutant channel promotes tendon formation. The increased Ca2+ signaling through CaV1.2 upregulates expression of the growth factor myostatin, a member of the TGF-β family and many extracellular matrix proteins for tendon cell proliferation and collagen fibrillogenesis.
1. INTRODUCTION
Tendons are tension-bearing tissues transmitting force from muscle to bone for body movement. This specialized function of tendons is supported by tendon specific extracellular matrix (ECM) structure with hierarchically organized collagen fibrils into fibers, fascicles, and then tendon.1 Collagen fibrils are composed primarily of type I collagen, a triple helical polypeptide chains encoded by the genes Col1a1 and Col1a2. Other tendon components are also present in the ECM important for tendon fibrillogenesis, such as type III, V, VI, XII and XIV collagens, small leucine rich proteoglycans (e.g., decorin, aggrecan, biglycan, and fibromodulin), and glycoproteins (e.g., tenascin C, tenomodulin, fibronectin, elastin, and collagen oligomeric matrix protein).2
Within the organized collagen fibrils reside tendon cells which are constantly subjected to mechanical stimulation in vivo, including shear stress, tensile loading, and compressive force. Both tendon fibroblasts, the major cells in tendon, and the tendon stem or progenitor cells (TSPCs) sense and respond to a variety of mechanical loads,3,4 which are then converted to cellular responses and biological signals, a process called mechanotransduction.5,6 Normal physiological loads are required for tendon fibroblast differentiation, ECM synthesis and organization during tendon development and adult tendon homeostasis.7–11 In contrast, underloading or overloading results in decreased synthesis of tendon ECM proteins, ECM degeneration or aberrant TSPC differentiation.12 However, the molecular mechanisms of tendon mechanobiology remains unclear.
Ca2+, a ubiquitous intracellular signal, controls many cellular functions including muscle contraction, immune cell activation, gene transcription and cell proliferation.13 A transient increase of intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) has been reported to be one of the earliest responses upon mechanical stimulation and activate various physiological and pathological functions in tendon, ligaments, bone, cartilage, and muscle development [reviewed in14,15]. It suggests that increased [Ca2+]i plays a key role in mechanotransduction. In tendons, the Snedeker group recently showed with Ca2+ imaging that a transient [Ca2+]i increase was observed by mechanical stimulation of the rat tail tendon fascicle ex vivo or isolated rat and human tenocytes; Piezo1 loss-of-function, gain-of-function, and pharmacological approaches identified this stretch-activated ion channel as the mechano-sensor in tendon cell mechanotransduction, regulating tendon tissue stiffness.16 However, ion influx through Piezo1 is rapid, transient, and not specific to Ca2+.17 Other source of Ca2+ entry may be required for the mechanical stimulated Ca2+ response in tendon cells. It could be functionally coupled with Piezo1 activation upon mechanical stimulation for opening and induces substantial Ca2+ signal for tendon cell mechanotransduction. For example, the CaV1.2 channel has been shown to mediate mechanosensitive Ca2+ influx in intestinal smooth muscle cells18 and is broadly expressed.19
CaV1.2 belongs to the family of L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (L-VGCCs), mediating Ca2+ influx into the cell upon membrane depolarization. CaV1.2 channel is composed of α1C, β and α2δ subunits,20 among which the α1C subunit is the ion conducting pore while the β and α2δ are auxiliary subunits that modulate channel properties.21 CaV1.2 is highly voltage-dependent, which is characterized by an activation threshold at a membrane potential around −20 mV.22 Most studies on CaV1.2 focused on its function in excitable cells such as cardiomyocytes and neurons, where action potentials facilitate activation of this voltage-gated channel. However, few studies focused on CaV1.2 in non-excitable cells, which have more restricted changes in membrane potential. Interestingly, studies of Timothy syndrome (TS), a multiorgan disorder (e.g., cardiac arrhythmias, autism, syndactyly and craniofacial abnormalities), caused by a de novo G406R mutation in the CaV1.2 pore forming α1C subunit encoded by CACNA1C,23,24 revealed critical but previously unappreciated roles for CaV1.2 in many non-excitable cells. For example, digital and craniofacial abnormalities in TS patients suggest roles for CaV1.2 in development and morphogenesis, and that aberrant G406R mutant channel (CaV1.2TS) activity adversely affects canonical developmental signals. Consistent with these hypotheses, we observed robust CaV1.2 endogenous expression in osteoblast progenitors during craniofacial and limb development using a CaV1.2 lacZ reporter mouse lin.25,26 In addition, by driving a CaV1.2TS transgene with Prx1Cre, Col1a1Cre, Col2aCre or Sp7Cre, we demonstrated that CaV1.2TS mutant channels promote bone formation via increased osteoblast differentiation and decreased osteoclast function. This also prevented estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss, highlighting the unexpected role for CaV1.2 in non-excitable tissue.25–27 The G406R mutation impairs CaV1.2 channel inactivation (closing) leading to more Ca2+ ions to flow into the cytoplasm. Thus, the consequences of CaV1.2TS mutant channel expression reported above result from a gain-of-function effect. However, whether CaV1.2 confers analogous effects during tendon development is not known. To address this, we tested whether the L-VGCC CaV1.2 is expressed in non-excitable tendon tissue, and whether an increase of Ca2+ signaling through CaV1.2TS mutant channels in tendon affects tendon formation.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Mice:
All animal studies were approved by the University of Rochester Committee for Animal Resources. CaV1.2+/LacZ and CaV1.2TS mice have been described previously.28–30 CaV1.2+/lacZ mouse line carries a lacZ reporter with a nuclear localization signal under the promoter of Cacna1c, the gene encoding CaV1.2. CaV1.2TS mouse line carries a rat G406R TS-causing mutant CaV1.2 cDNA which was knocked into the Rosa26 locus with an upstream floxed stop codon to control the transgene expression by the Cre-loxP system. Homozygous floxed CaV1.2TS mice were crossed with the transgenic ScxCre mice (generously provided by Dr. Ronen Schweitzer) to induce CaV1.2TS expression and modulate the Ca2+ signals in tendon during development and growth. All tendon analyses were performed on mice at 1 month of age unless otherwise specified. Mutant mice or littermate controls of both male and female mice were analyzed unless otherwise specified.
2.2. X-gal staining and histology:
It has been descripted previously.30 Briefly, visualization of lacZ expression was done by X-gal 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside) staining in whole mount embryos or limbs. For whole mount X-gal staining, embryos, forelimbs or hindlimbs were fixed in ice-cold fixation solution (2% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaradehyde in 1× PBS) for 20 minutes (for embryos), 1 hour (for postnatal stage), or 2 hours (for adult stage), washed with 1x PBS for 3 times, each 10 minutes, processed with X-gal staining solution (5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 1 mg/ml X-gal, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.2% IGEPAL CA-630) in dark for 24 ~ 72 hours at 37°C. For histological analysis, whole mount X-gal-stained tissues were further decalcified with 14% EDTA at 4°C, 30% sucrose, and snap-frozen embedded with OCT compound (Sakura Finetek). Frozen sections (10 μm thickness) were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red. For histology on fresh tendon tissue, tendons were isolated and immediately processed into 30% sucrose for 1 hour at room temperature, snap-frozen embedded with OCT compound. Samples were cross-sectioned at 10 μm thickness. Sections were air-dried for 1 hour at room temperature, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaradehyde in 1× PBS for 10 minutes, followed by Hematoxylin and Fast Green staining with standard protocols.
2.3. RNA extraction and RT-qPCR:
For total RNA isolated from tendon tissue, miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) was used. Achilles tendon and plantaris tendon were carefully dissected from control and ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice, both sexes at 1 month of age. Tendons from each animal represented as one biological replicate without pooling tissues from different animals. Tendons were homogenized in QiAzol lysis reagent (Qiagen) using Biomasher II disposable micro tissue homogenizer and total RNA was purified following the kit instruction. Total RNA (500 ng) was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and qPCR with SYBR green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt methods by first normalization to Gapdh (ΔCt) and second normalization to control samples (ΔΔCt). The primers used for tested genes were listed in Table 1, with Mstn, Scx, Tnmd, and Gapdh primers were previously described.31
Table 1.
PCR primer sequences
| primers | Primers (5’−3’) |
|---|---|
| Mstn-F | TGCAAAATTGGCTCAAACAG |
| Mstn-R | GCAGTCAAGCCCAAAGTCTC |
| Tnmd-F | TGTACTGGATCAATCCCACTCT |
| Tnmd-R | GCTCATTCTGGTCAATCCCCT |
| Scx-F | CCTTCTGCCTCAGCAACCAG |
| Scx-R | GGTCCAAAGTGGGGCTCTCCGTGACT |
| Mmp14-F | AGGCTGATTTGGCAACCATGA |
| Mmp14-R | CCCACCTTAGGGGTGTAATTCTG |
| Col1a1 -F | TGGAGAGAGCATGACCGATG |
| Col1a1 -R | GAGCCCTCGCTTCCGTACT |
| Tnc -F | AACCATCAATGCGGCCAC |
| Tnc -R | TGTCGTCCAGAAAAACGTCAGA |
| Gapdh -F | TTGTGGAAGGGCTCATGACC |
| Gapdh -R | TCTTCTGGGTGGCAGTGATG |
2.4. Collagen transmission electron microscopy (TEM):
Achilles tendons from control and ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice at 1 month of age were used for TEM analysis. First, mouse hindlimbs were fixed in 1 × PBS containing 1.5% glutaraldehyde/1.5% formaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat#: 15950), 0.05% tannic acid at 4 °C for overnight with gentle agitation. Achilles tendons were dissected out and post-fixed in 1% OsO4. After washing with 1 × PBS and dehydration in a graded series of ethanol, tendon samples were rinsed in propylene oxide, infiltrated in Spurrs epoxy and polymerized at 70 °C for overnight. Ultrathin sections at 80 nm were used for imaging using a FEI G20 TEM by the core service at MicroImaging Center, Shriners Hospital for Children, Portland. ImageJ was used for the measurement of collagen fibril CSA.
2.5 Mechanical properties testing:
Uniaxial displacement-controlled stretching at 1% strain per second until failure descripted previously32 was applied to Achilles tendons isolated from ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant or littermate controls at 1 month of age for both sexes. Achilles tendon preparation followed the previous reported description with some modification.33 Briefly, Achilles tendons (without plantaris tendons) were dissected out with one end attaching to the calcaneus bone and the other end with muscle. Tendons were wrapped in 1 × PBS-soaked kimwrap and stored at −20 °C until use. Prior to mechanical tests, tendons were thawed at room temperature, submerged in 1 × PBS, cleaned away of muscle to prevent slipping, placed with both ends between two layers of sandpaper, glued with cranoacrylate (Superglue, LOCTITE), and secured with a compression clamps. Each Achilles tendon was first quantified by its gauge length and CSA from 3 evenly spaced width and depth measurements from high-resolution digital micrographs of both top and side views of the tendon (Olympus BX51, Olympus). Mechanical property testing was performed in a bath containing 1 × PBS at room temperature. A uniaxial displacement-controlled stretching of 1% strain per second was applied until failure occurred. Load and displacement were recorded, and the failure of each mechanically tested tendon was confirmed which often occurred at tendon mid-substance. Tendon peak load was taken as the maximum load prior tendon’s failure, while tendon stiffness was specified by the slope of the linear region from the load-displacement curve. Tendon tensile stress was defined as the recorded load divided by tendon CSA, while tendon tensile strain as the displacement divided by the gauge length. Tendon elastic modulus was calculated by the slope of the linear region from the plotted tendon tensile stress-strain curve. Tendon structural properties (stiffness, and peak load) and material properties (peak stress and elastic modulus) were determined from each Achilles tendon.
2.6. Proteomics and data analysis:
Mass spectrometry (MS) proteomic analysis was performed at the Mass Spectrometry Resource Laboratory, University of Rochester. Achilles tendons (combined with plantaris tendon) were isolated from ScxCre;CaV1.2TSmutant or littermate control mouse at 1 month of age. Tendons from each animal represented as one biological replicate without pooling tissues from different animals. The tendon samples were homogenized and proteins were alkylated by 10 mM iodoacetamine and trapped by S-Trap micro (Protifi). After Trypsin digestion and elution from S-Trap micro, peptides were labeled with TMTpro 16plex reagents (Thermo Fisher) following the manufacturers protocol and subjected to high PH fractionation using homemade C18 spin columns and stepwise addition of 10 mM ammonium hydroxide. LC-MS analysis was performed using an Easy nLC-1200 HPLC (Thermo Fisher), connected to Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). Fractionized peptides were loaded into a homemade 30 cm C18 column with 1.8 um beads (Sepax) and run on a 2-hour gradient as described previously.34 Raw data was searched using the SEQUEST search engine within the Proteome Discoverer software platform, version 2.4 (Thermo Fisher), using the Uniprot mouse database (downloaded January 2020). Percolator was used as the false discovery rate (FDR) calculator, filtering out peptides which had a q-value greater than 0.01. Reporter ions were quantified using the Reporter Ions Quantifier node, with an integration tolerance of 20 ppm, and the integration method being set to “most confident centroid”. Protein abundances were calculated by summing the signal to noise of the reporter ions from each identified peptide, while excluding any peptides with an isolation interference of greater than 30%, or SPS matches less than 65%. Z-scores were calculated from the normalized abundance of each protein to create heatmaps via GraphPad. Only proteins with significantly different abundance (p < 0.05) were used in the heatmaps. In addition, DAVID bioinformatics Resources (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/tools.jsp) was used for GO term enrichment analysis for proteins exhibiting 1.5-fold higher or 1.5-fold lower levels of expression in abundance and FDR p-value <0.05.
2.7 Statistics:
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 or OriginPro 8. Two-tailed unpaired t tests were used to compare between mutant and control groups. Fold changes were calculated by dividing the value of the mutant group by the value of the control group. Increasing or decreasing changes were calculated by dividing the value of difference between the mutant group and the control group by the value of the control group and then multiplying 100. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/KS-test.n.plot_form.html) was performed to determine if the size of collagen fibril differs significantly between groups. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01.
3. RESULTS
3.1. CaV1.2 is expressed in tendon fibroblasts during mouse tendon development and early postnatal growth.
To determine whether the Cav1.2 channel contributes to tendon formation during development, postnatal growth and homeostasis, we first elucidated CaV1.2 channel expression in tendons at different stages by using a CaV1.2 reporter mouse line (CaV1.2+/lacZ, B6.129P2-Cacna1ctm1Dgen/J) in which the bacterial lacZ gene encoding β-galactosidase fused to a nuclear localization signal was knocked into Cacna1c labeling nuclei of cells that express CaV1.2.25,27 We performed whole mount X-gal staining of the forelimbs and hindlimbs, followed by frozen sectioning and histological analysis. We found substantial X-gal staining in the developing digital tendons from E13.5 (Fig. 1A), and increased intensity of staining at late embryonic stages (Fig. 1B). X-gal staining in digital tendons was confirmed by histological analysis on frozen sections of the developing digits (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, we found CaV1.2 expression persisted through early postnatal stages (~P3) in the Achilles tendons (Fig. 1D) and patellar tendons (Fig. 1F). Notably, X-gal staining was exclusively localized in the nucleus, which is distinct from any non-specific staining resulting from endogenous β-galactosidase activity, and thus provides an accurate picture of endogenous CaV1.2 expression. However, in adult tendons, CaV1.2 expression was dramatically downregulated. For example, adult Achilles tendon demonstrated restricted CaV1.2 expression mostly seen in the myotendinous junction with very sparse expression in the tendon substance (Fig. 1E). In contrast, adult patellar tendon retains strong CaV1.2 expression throughout the tendon tissue, but in relatively fewer cells compared with patellar tendons in early postnatal stage (Fig. 1G). In summary, the dynamic expression of CaV1.2 during tendon development, postnatal growth and adult homeostasis stage suggests that CaV1.2 and its mediated Ca2+ signaling may play a critical role for tendon formation.
Figure 1. CaV1.2 is expressed in tendon fibroblasts during embryonic development and early postnatal growth in mice.

(A&B) Representative images of whole-mount X-gal stained forelimbs from CaV1.2+/LacZ embryos harvested at E13.5 (A) and at E16.5 (B) are shown to illustrate expression of the transgene in the skeletal elements. (C-G) Fast red counterstaining was performed on frozen sections of whole-mount X-gal stained CaV1.2+/LacZ forelimb digits at E14.5 (C), Achilles tendon at P3 (D) and P45 (E), and patellar tendon P3 (F) and P45 (G); boxed regions were obtained at high power. The nuclear localization of blue color resulting from X-gal staining illustrates the specific transgene expression in tendon fibroblasts.
3.2. Expression of CaV1.2TS mutant channel in ScxCre+ lineage cells enhances tendon formation.
To investigate the role of CaV1.2 on tendon formation in vivo, we exploited the conditional transgenic mouse line carrying the CaV1.2TS mutant cDNA in the Rosa26 locus.35 We generated ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice to allow for CaV1.2TS expression under the Scleraxis (Scx) promoter, which regulates transcription during tendon development, and is the earliest known marker of tendon progenitors.36 Macroscopic observation of ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice revealed hypertrophic tendons in all tendons examined, including Achilles tendon, plantaris tendons, patellar tendons, tail tendons, tendons in the forelimbs and back tendons, compared to tendons in control mice at one month of age (Fig. 2). Histologic analyses further confirmed tendon hypertrophy in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice (Fig. 3). Fast green and hematoxylin staining revealed that the cross-section area (CSA) was increased by 61% in patellar tendons, 70% in plantaris tendons, and 74% in Achilles tendons from 1-month-old ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice compared with those in control mice. Consistently, cell numbers in patellar tendons, plantaris tendons and Achilles tendons were increased by 21%, 32% and 38% in the mutant mice, respectively, indicating increased cell proliferation in the mutant tendons. However, ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice had decreased cell density (cell number/CSA) by 22% in all three types of tendons. This suggests that CaV1.2TS-expressing tendon fibroblasts are more functionally active. Moreover, we found that ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice had thicker tail tendon fascicles, which have a broader size distribution than those in the control mice (Supplementary Fig. 1). Notably, there was no change in the number of fascicles of both ventral and dorsal tail tendons between genotypes, suggesting that CaV1.2TS mutant channels affect tendon fascicle growth but not fascicle determination.
Figure 2. Enhanced tenogenesis in ScxCre; CaV1.2TS mice.

Gross anatomy was performed on tendons from 1 month-old Cre-; CaV1.2TS and ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice, and representative images of: plantaris tendons (arrows) and Achilles tendons (*) in hindlimbs (A), patellar tendons (B), tail tendons (C), tendons in forelimbs (D) and back tendons (E) are shown. Note the white tissues are tendons indicated by * or arrows, and appear larger in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS (TS) vs. Cre-; CaV1.2TS control (Ctrl) mice.
Figure 3. Increased tendon hypertrophy in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice.

(A, B, C and D) Representative images of fast green and hematoxylin stained tendon cross sections from littermate control (Cre-;CaV1.2TS) and ScxCre; CaV1.2TS mice at 1 month of age. (E) Histomorphometry was performed on these sections to quantify tendon cross section area (CSA), number of cells in whole tendon cross section area, and tendon cell density (number of cells/CSA), and the data for each tendon are presented with the mean for the group ± SD (n >= 3, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ns, not significant). Statistical analysis was performed by 2-tailed unpaired t test, and a p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. PT: patellar tendon, PL: plantaris tendon, Ach: Achilles tendon.
3.3. Expression of CaV1.2TS mutant channel in ScxCre+ lineage cells alters tendon collagen fibril size distribution.
To further investigate the effects of the CaV1.2TS mutant channel on tendon collagen fibrillogenesis, we performed ultrastructural analyses using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of Achilles tendons from ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice and littermate controls at 1 month of age. In the mutant Achilles tendons, the collagen fibrils displayed normal circular cross-sectional profiles, similar to the control fibrils (Fig. 4A and B). However, the collagen fibril density in the mutant tendons was increased by 68% without a significant change in interfibrillar spacing (Fig. 4C and D), indicating increased collagen fibrillogenesis in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice. Furthermore, the mutant Achilles tendons were packed with more small- to-middle size collagen fibrils, resulting in the change of the repartition of collagen fibrils in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice (Fig. 4E). In addition, a leftward shift of the fibril size distribution of the mutant tendon in the cumulative fraction analysis further supported that the collagen fibrils in mutant mice are smaller than those in the control mice (p <0.01 by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) (Fig. 4F). Taken together, these data suggest increased Ca2+ signaling through the CaV1.2TS mutant channel increases collagen fibril assembly, which contributes to tendon hypertrophy in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice.
Figure 4. Altered collagen fibril size distribution of Achilles tendons in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice.

(A and B) Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Achilles tendon collagen fibrils from littermate control (Cre-;CaV1.2TS) and ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice at 1 month of age are shown to illustrate the smaller fibrils in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice as illustrated by the difference in size of the largest fibril in each group (yellow highlight). (C and D) Histomorphometry was performed on these TEM sections to quantify fibril density (number of fibrils/CSA of fibrils) (C) and the collagen interfibrillar spacing (D); the data are presented for each tendon with the mean ± SD (n >= 3, **** p < 0.0001). (E) Histograms showing the altered frequencies of collagen fibril CSAs from ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice compared to control mice. (F) Cumulative fraction analysis of collagen fibril CSAs, showing the left-shift of the size of collagen fibrils in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows that the tendon fibrils are significantly smaller than those in control mice, n >= 3, p < 0.001. CSA: cross section area. Ctrl: Cre-;CaV1.2TS control mice; TS: ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice.
3.4. CaV1.2TS alters tendon biomechanical properties.
Since cellular arrangement and fibril packing are important determinants of biomechanical properties,37–39 increased tendon growth and the change of collagen fibril size distribution in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant tendons may alter their mechanical properties. Therefore, we performed the biomechanical property test in mature mutant Achilles tendon in comparison with the control ones. Cross-sectional area (CSA), peak load, peak stress, stiffness, and elastic modulus were measured. Mutant Achilles tendons displayed a significantly larger CSA than the control Achilles tendons (Fig. 5A), exhibited ~1.50-fold increase in peak load, and a ~1.52-fold increase in stiffness (tensile/displacement) in the force-displacement response (Fig. 5B and C), indicating functional gain in structure properties of mutant Achilles tendons. However, the material properties including the peak stress (the peak load per unit area), and the elastic modulus (a measurement of intrinsic stiffness or material quality in the linear regime of the stress-strain curve), did not show significant changes between genotypes (Fig. 5D and E). This suggests that the increase in structural stiffness in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant tendons is due to the increased tendon mass.
Figure 5. Specific biomechanical alteration of Achilles tendons in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice.

Uniaxial displacement-controlled stretching test was performed on Achilles tendons from control and ScxCre;CaV1.2TS of both male and female mice at 1 month of age to quantify: peak load (A), stiffness (B), elastic modulus (D) and peak stress (E) mice. The data are presented for each tendon with the mean ± SD (n >= 19, ** p < 0.01, ns: not significant via t-test).
3.5. CaV1.2TS alterations in the proteome of tendons.
To define the molecular consequences of CaV1.2TS expression, we quantified tissue-wide protein changes using mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis on ScxCre;CaV1.2TS versus control mice at 1 month of age. We observed 89 upregulated proteins (>1.5 fold-change) and 102 downregulated proteins (<−1.5 fold-change) in CaV1.2TS-expressing mice compared with those in control mice (Fig. 6A and B, Supplementary Fig. 2). The six proteins identified with the largest increase in expression in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant tendons were Mstn (myostatin, a member of the TGFβ-superfamily), Pavlb (a high affinity Ca2+-binding protein similar to calmodulin in structure and function), Tnn (Tenascin-N), Cthrc1 (collagen triple helix repeat-containing protein 1), Angptl1 and Antptl2 (angiopoietin-like proteins). In contrast, the proteins with the largest decrease were Chad (chondroadherin, a cartilage matrix protein), Zmym4 (Zinc Finger MYM-type containing 4), Angptl7, Htra4 (high temperature requirement factor A4) and Omd (Osteomodulin) (Fig. 6C). Moreover, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses were performed to classify the putative functions of the differentially upregulated and downregulated protein sets in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice in comparison with those of the control mice. In GO terms of cellular component, we found that these differentially expressed proteins are related to ECM, Proteinaceous ECM, extracellular region, extracellular exosome, and extracellular space (Fig. 6D). Furthermore, GO analysis in term of biological process showed that many of these proteins were involved in ECM organization (increase of Col8a1, Mmp14, Mmp2, and Postn, decrease of Abi3bp, Ccdc80, Col15a1, Col24a1, Fbln1, Fbln2, Lgals3, Prdx4, Tnxb, Vit and Vtn), collagen fibril organization (increase of Col14a1, decrease of Comp, Fmod, and Tnxb), collagen catabolic process (increase of Ctsk, Mmp14, and Mmp2), response to mechanical stimulus (increase of Mmp14, Mmp2, Postn, Tnc, and decrease of Thbs1 and Dcn) as shown in Fig. 6E. We didn’t observe significant differences in the abundance of type I collagen and type III collagen between genotypes.
Figure 6. Altered proteomics of Achilles tendons in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice.

Proteomic analysis was performed on Achilles tendon from control (Cre-;CaV1.2TS) and ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice at 1 month old. (A) Heatmap of all significantly different proteins between control and ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice. (B) Volcano plot showing upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) protein expression in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice compared to control mice. (C) Heatmap showing the proteins with largest increase and decrease in expression in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice compared to control mice. (D) The GO terms of upregulated and downregulated differentially expressed proteins in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice with DAVID analysis. (E) Normalized abundance of the proteins with significant increase and decrease in expression in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice compared to control mice. Values are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 , *** p < 0.001. n = 4 for each group. Identification of proteins, > 1.5-fold or <−1.5-fold change in abundance and FDR p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
To validate these findings, we performed real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) of selected markers related to tendon formation including: Mstn, Tnc, Tnmd, Mmp14, Scx and Col1a1, and found these gene mRNA expression was consistent with their expression at protein level (Fig. 7). For example, the growth factor Mstn, which is a positive regulator for tendon formation31 and had the greatest protein increase (~11.4-fold) in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS tendons, displayed a ~35.7-fold upregulation in mRNA expression (Fig. 7A). The expression of Tnc, Tnmd and Mmp14 was increased around 2.9-, 2.5- and 4.9-fold, irrespectively, in CaV1.2G406R-expressing Achilles(Fig. 7B–D). In contrast, Scx and Col1a1 didn’t show significant differences between genotypes at mRNA level (Fig. 7E and F). Taken together, these data suggest that CaV1.2TS mutant channels promoted tendon formation by upregulating expression of Mstn and the less abundant ECM proteins for tendon collagen fibril organization and ECM turnover.
Figure 7. Gene expression analysis in Achilles/plantaris tendons of control and ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice.

(A-F) Quantitative analysis of RT-qPCR for Mstn, Tnc, Tnmd, Mmp14, Scx, and Col1a1 expression. Target gene expression values were normalized to the stable housekeeping gene Gapdh, and then to relative control expression levels. Values are mean ± SD, n = 3 for each group. Difference between groups were tested using 2-tailed unpaired t test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
4. DISCUSSION
The current study identified the dynamic expression of endogenous CaV1.2, a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel in tendon fibroblasts during tendon development, growth and homeostasis by utilizing a conclusive CaV1.2 lacZ reporter mouse line. This discovery prompted us to examine whether this voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel functions in tendon formation. Using a transgenic mouse model (ScxCre;CaV1.2TS), we demonstrated that expression of the gain-of-function G406R mutant channel Cav1.2TS specifically in ScxCre+ tendon fibroblasts dramatically promotes tendon formation. Biomechanical testing showed that the enlarged tendons in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice display a dramatic increase of their structural properties including stiffness and peak load, but have similar material properties, such as peak stress and elastic modulus, compared to WT tendons. Therefore, the increased tendon stiffness and peak load could be owing to the proportional increase of tendon thickness (measured by CSA). Notably, these changes of tendon biomechanical properties in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice are comparable to those in the adaptation of human tendons after years of long-term training with larger tendon CSA and increased tendon stiffness, but no differences in material properties based on the meta-analysis of tendon property changes with training,40 suggesting the role of Ca2+ signaling via CaV1.2 may be linked with tendon loading and mechanotransduction. Taken together, our data provides the first evidence that modulating Ca2+ signaling through CaV1.2 in tendon fibroblasts in vivo affects tendon formation, highlighting additional unexpected roles of CaV1.2 channels in non-excitable tissues that we previously reported.25–27
The tendon hypertrophy in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant mice is likely due to both increased tendon fibroblast proliferation and ECM collagen fibril formation. This speculation is supported by our findings that the mutant tendons had significantly more cells but reduced cellular density (Fig. 3). This specific spatial organization of tendon cells can result from more increased collagen fibrillogenesis and fibril assembly relative to the increase in tendon cell proliferation. This is supported by our TEM findings that ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant tendons generated more collagen fibrils with smaller diameter versus WT tendons (Fig. 4). During tendon development, short and small-diameter fibril intermediates are initially assembled, which serve as the building blocks to form large and long collagen fibrils in late stage of tendon growth.41 The accumulated small-to-medium size fibrils in the mutant tendons indicated an increased collagen fibrillogenesis and active fibril formation in response to upregulated Ca2+ signaling in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice. Subsequently, we performed proteomic analysis to define the tissue-wide protein change and understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for the altered collagen fibrillogenesis. It is known that tendon collagen fibrillogenesis can be regulated in several ways, including 1) the synthesis of fibril-forming collagen (predominantly type I collagen with varying amounts of type II, III and V in tendon), 2) the abundance of specific fibril-associated proteoglycans and glycoproteins (such as decorin, biglycan, lumican, fibromodulin and COMP), or 3) the abundance of the fibril-associated collagen with interrupted triple helics (FACIT) (such as type IX, XII, XIV, XVI, XIX, XX, XXI, XXII, and XXVI collagens).2,41,42 A deficiency of decorin, lumican, fibromodulin, COMP and type XVI collagen in vivo has been shown to result in larger and disorganized collagen fibrils.43–47 Interesting, our proteomic analysis showed that in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant tendons, the major fibril-forming collagens (Col1a1 and Col1a2) was not differentially expressed versus control tendons. However, the fibril-associated FACIT collagen (Col14a1) was significantly upregulated, while proteoglycans including decorin and fibromodulin and glycoprotein COMP were downregulated in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS tendons. Thus, while a combination of these fibril-associated macromolecules with variable amount contributed to the tendon collagen fibrillogenesis and growth, type XIV collagen may be the dominant factor affecting collagen fibrillogenesis and assembly in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS tendons. Furthermore, collagen fibrillogenesis requires activities of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their corresponding tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) to convert procollagen into collagen by removing the N- and C-pro-peptides, and alter the surface of fibril intermediates and/or interfibrillar matrix.2,48 Notably, we found that Mmp2 and Mmp14 were both dramatically upregulated while Timp3 was downregulated in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS tendons by proteomics analysis (Fig. 6E and 6G). It is known that Mmp2 is initially produced as latent pro-Mmp2, which requires the membrane type (MT) MMPs such as Mmp14 for cleavage and activation.49,50 It has been shown that in an in vitro system, knockdown of Mmp14 inhibited proMmp2 activation.51 Moreover, Mmp14 has been shown to promote new formation of collagen fibers, the high order of tendon structure; the tendons of mutant mice lacking Mmp14 have fewer collagen fibers than normal mice.52 Whereas all active MMPs can be inhibited by TIMPs, Timp3 is the main TIMP which inhibits activity against some of the ADAMS and ADAMTS metalloproteinases.53,54 Taken together, decrease in Timp3 expression along with the elevated expression of Mmp2, Mmp14 and Type XIV FACIT collagen in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant tendon will facilitate procollagen maturation, collagen fibril assembly and remodeling, all of which contribute to the active collagen fibrillogenesis and the higher structure fiber growth, ultimately tendon hypertrophy upon increased Ca2+ signaling.
Our proteomic analysis also identified a dramatic increase of myostatin in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant tendons. Myostatin, also called growth/differentiation factor-8 (GDF-8), is the growth factor of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily. Myostatin is mostly known as a negative regulator of muscle growth, and the loss of myostatin function is associated with hypermuscular phenotypes in mice and cattle.55,56 In contrast, myostatin was found to be a positive regulator for tendon formation as myostatin-deficient mice have small (a decrease in fibroblast number) and brittle tendons (a higher peak stress, a lower peak strain and increased stiffness).57 Thus, upregulation of myostatin in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mutant tendon may promote tendon hypertrophy in the mutant mice upon increased Ca2+ signaling. However, whether myostatin signaling mediates tendon growth in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice requires further investigation. Conditional knockout of Mstn alleles in CaV1.2TS-expressing tendon fibroblasts would be necessary to exclude the possibility that other myostatin-independent signaling pathways may also contribute to CaV1.2TS-induced tendon formation. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that the p38 mitogen-activate protein kinase (MAPK) and Smad2/3 signaling cascades58,59 in tendon fibroblasts were activated in response to myostatin treatment, which are required for the increased cell proliferation and gene expression including Scx, Col1a1, and Tnmd.57 Consistently, we observed increased expression of Tnmd both at protein and mRNA levels in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS mice. However, we didn’t detect a significant change of Scx and Col1a1 expression in response to upregulated myostatin in CaV1.2TS-expressing tendons. This discrepancy may be due to the maximal dose of myostatin normally used in in vitro cell culture while in in vivo system, myostatin may be dominantly maintained in an inactive form. Nevertheless, upregulation of Tnmd and Tnc, known as the downstream targets of transcription factor Scx and regulated by pSmad2/3 pathway,60,61 didn’t depend on a corresponding increase of Scx expression in ScxCre;CaV1.2TS tendons.
Although the mechanism by which CaV1.2 activation occurs in non-excitable tendon fibroblasts has yet to be explored, our finding that CaV1.2 is dynamically expressed during tendon development, growth and adult homeostasis suggests a role of Ca2+ signaling in tendon fibroblasts spatiotemporally. It also implies the potential mechanisms to activate the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel. In adults, CaV1.2 expression is dramatically decreased compared to that during tendon development and early postnatal growth. CaV1.2 expression in adult Achilles tendon is restricted to the myotendinous junction (Fig. 1), a site where forces generated by myofibrils are transmitted across the cell membrane to act on tendon.62 Notably, at this interface between an excitable muscle and non-excitable tendon, topological action potential may occur via gap junction,63 which results in non-excitable tendon fibroblasts in myotendinous junctions electrically excitable and then activate this voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel. Tendon fibroblasts in myotendinous junction could function as a signal initiator, which once stimulated by muscle contraction, will diffuse signal factors down to the neighboring fibroblasts. However, during stages before the stable myotendinous junction forms in tendons, usually at 1 month old in rats,64 or in patellar tendons (ligaments precisely) without the myotendinous junction structure, other mechanisms to activate CaV1.2 voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel may also exist, by which the depolarizing drive does not require action potentials. Recently, the mechanosensitive channel Piezo1 has been reported to be expressed in tendon tissue and to sense the mechanical loading in tenocytes; knocking out Piezo1 in cultured tenocytes greatly decreases shear stress-induced Ca2+ signals.16 Given the fact that Piezo1 and its homolog Piezo2 conduct a rapid and transient cation influx (non-selective to Ca2+),17 activation of Piezo1/2 by mechanical stimuli may provide an inward depolarizing current, which in turn activates the voltage-gated CaV1.2 channels co-expressed in tendon fibroblasts to amplify the Ca2+ signal. However, whether CaV1.2 is required for mechanotransduction in tendon has yet to be determined. Nevertheless, this spontaneous CaV1.2 activation without action potential may be inefficient which is compensated by higher expression of CaV1.2 channels to initiate the Ca2+ signaling for mechanotransduction. It is the case that we observed more robust CaV1.2 expression in all tendons during early tendon growth before the formation of a stable myotendinous junction as well as in adult patellar tendons without myotendinous junction.
In summary, our data identified a novel role of CaV1.2 voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel in non-excitable tissue tendon and demonstrated that increased Ca2+ influx through CaV1.2 promotes tendon formation predominantly by regulating tendon collagen fibrillogenesis. This was achieved through increased expression of the growth factor myostatin and a combination of differentially expressed fibril associated FACIT type XIV collagen, MMPs, TIMPs and other ECM proteins. These biochemical responses following increased Ca2+ signaling may cooperate in the adaptation of tendon in response to mechanical loading or tendon healing after tendon injuries. Pharmacologically, CaV1.2 agonists, such as BayK-8644 or FPL 64176 can mimic the effect of CaV1.2TS to increased Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane. Therefore, our data in this study highlights a potential therapeutic strategy to target CaV1.2 channel and promote tendon formation and healing after injuries.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dr. Ronen Schweitzer for providing ScxCre mouse line, Douglas keene (MicrroImaging Center, Shriners Hospital for Children) for providing the TEM core service, Dr. Sina Ghaemmaghami and Welle Kevin (Mass Spectrometry Resource Lab, University of Rochester) for providing Mass spectrometry service and Dr. Edward Schwartz (Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester) for his critical reading and helpful suggestions. This work was supported by NIH NIAMS R21AR075214 and P30AR69655.
Footnotes
DISCLOSURES
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The original proteomics data for this study will be made available upon acceptance for publication. All other data that support the findings of this study are available in the methods and results of this article.
REFERENCES
- 1.Silver FH, Freeman JW, Seehra GP. Collagen self-assembly and the development of tendon mechanical properties. J Biomech. 2003;36(10):1529–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mouw JK, Ou G, Weaver VM. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2014;15(12):771–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang J, Wang JH. The effects of mechanical loading on tendons--an in vivo and in vitro model study. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang C, Zhu J, Zhou Y, Thampatty BP, Wang JH. Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells and Their Interactions with Extracellular Matrix and Mechanical Loading. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:3674647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ingber DE. Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. Faseb j. 2006;20(7):811–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dunn SL, Olmedo ML. Mechanotransduction: Relevance to Physical Therapist Practice—Understanding Our Ability to Affect Genetic Expression Through Mechanical Forces. Physical Therapy. 2016;96(5):712–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kalson NS, Holmes DF, Herchenhan A, Lu Y, Starborg T, Kadler KE. Slow stretching that mimics embryonic growth rate stimulates structural and mechanical development of tendon-like tissue in vitro. Dev Dyn. 2011;240(11):2520–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Henderson JH, Carter DR. Mechanical induction in limb morphogenesis: the role of growth-generated strains and pressures. Bone. 2002;31(6):645–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nowlan NC, Murphy P, Prendergast PJ. Mechanobiology of embryonic limb development. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:389–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Subramanian A, Kanzaki LF, Galloway JL, Schilling TF. Mechanical force regulates tendon extracellular matrix organization and tenocyte morphogenesis through TGFbeta signaling. eLife. 2018;7:e38069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bhole AP, Flynn BP, Liles M, Saeidi N, Dimarzio CA, Ruberti JW. Mechanical strain enhances survivability of collagen micronetworks in the presence of collagenase: implications for load-bearing matrix growth and stability. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009;367(1902):3339–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang JH, Guo Q, Li B. Tendon biomechanics and mechanobiology--a minireview of basic concepts and recent advancements. J Hand Ther. 2012;25(2):133–40; quiz 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clapham DE. Calcium signaling. Cell. 2007;131(6):1047–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wall ME, Banes AJ. Early responses to mechanical load in tendon: role for calcium signaling, gap junctions and intercellular communication. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005;5(1):70–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wall ME, Dyment NA, Bodle J, Volmer J, Loboa E, Cederlund A, et al. Cell Signaling in Tenocytes: Response to Load and Ligands in Health and Disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;920:79–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Passini FS, Jaeger PK, Saab AS, Hanlon S, Chittim NA, Arlt MJ, et al. Shear-stress sensing by PIEZO1 regulates tendon stiffness in rodents and influences jumping performance in humans. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5(12):1457–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Coste B, Mathur J, Schmidt M, Earley TJ, Ranade S, Petrus MJ, et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 2010;330(6000):55–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lyford GL, Strege PR, Shepard A, Ou Y, Ermilov L, Miller SM, et al. alpha(1C) (Ca(V)1.2) L-type calcium channel mediates mechanosensitive calcium regulation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;283(3):C1001–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pitt GS, Matsui M, Cao C. Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels in Nonexcitable Tissues. Annu Rev Physiol. 2021;83:183–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Catterall WA. Structure and regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:521–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Serysheva II, Ludtke SJ, Baker MR, Chiu W, Hamilton SL. Structure of the voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channel by electron cryomicroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(16):10370–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Catterall WA, Perez-Reyes E, Snutch TP, Striessnig J. International Union of Pharmacology. XLVIII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated calcium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57(4):411–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Splawski I, Timothy KW, Sharpe LM, Decher N, Kumar P, Bloise R, et al. Ca(V)1.2 calcium channel dysfunction causes a multisystem disorder including arrhythmia and autism. Cell. 2004;119(1):19–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Splawski I, Timothy KW, Decher N, Kumar P, Sachse FB, Beggs AH, et al. Severe arrhythmia disorder caused by cardiac L-type calcium channel mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(23):8089–96; discussion 6–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cao C, Ren Y, Barnett AS, Mirando AJ, Rouse D, Mun SH, et al. Increased Ca2+ signaling through CaV1.2 promotes bone formation and prevents estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss. JCI Insight. 2017;2(22). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cao C, Oswald AB, Fabella BA, Ren Y, Rodriguiz R, Trainor G, et al. The CaV1.2 L-type calcium channel regulates bone homeostasis in the middle and inner ear. Bone. 2019;125:160–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ramachandran KV, Hennessey JA, Barnett AS, Yin X, Stadt HA, Foster E, et al. Calcium influx through L-type CaV1.2 Ca2+ channels regulates mandibular development. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2013;123(4):1638–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ramachandran KV, Hennessey JA, Barnett AS, Yin X, Stadt HA, Foster E, et al. Calcium influx through L-type Ca V 1.2 Ca 2+ channels regulates mandibular development. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123(4):1638–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Paşca SP, Portmann T, Voineagu I, Yazawa M, Shcheglovitov A, Paşca AM, et al. Using iPSC-derived neurons to uncover cellular phenotypes associated with Timothy syndrome. Nature medicine. 2011;17(12):1657–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cao C, Ren Y, Barnett AS, Mirando AJ, Rouse D, Mun SH, et al. Increased Ca2+ signaling through CaV1.2 promotes bone formation and prevents estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss. JCI insight. 2017;2(22):e95512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mendias CL, Bakhurin KI, Faulkner JA. Tendons of myostatin-deficient mice are small, brittle, and hypocellular. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(1):388–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Korcari A, Buckley MR, Loiselle AE. Characterization of scar tissue biomechanics during adult murine flexor tendon healing. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2022;130:105192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sarver DC, Kharaz YA, Sugg KB, Gumucio JP, Comerford E, Mendias CL. Sex differences in tendon structure and function. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(10):2117–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McAlister GC, Nusinow DP, Jedrychowski MP, Wuhr M, Huttlin EL, Erickson BK, et al. MultiNotch MS3 enables accurate, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of differential expression across cancer cell line proteomes. Anal Chem. 2014;86(14):7150–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Paşca SP, Portmann T, Voineagu I, Yazawa M, Shcheglovitov A, Paşca AM, et al. Using iPSC-derived neurons to uncover cellular phenotypes associated with Timothy syndrome. Nat Med. 2011;17(12):1657–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schweitzer R, Chyung JH, Murtaugh LC, Brent AE, Rosen V, Olson EN, et al. Analysis of the tendon cell fate using Scleraxis, a specific marker for tendons and ligaments. Development. 2001;128(19):3855–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thorpe CT, Udeze CP, Birch HL, Clegg PD, Screen HR. Specialization of tendon mechanical properties results from interfascicular differences. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9(76):3108–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ansorge HL, Meng X, Zhang G, Veit G, Sun M, Klement JF, et al. Type XIV Collagen Regulates Fibrillogenesis*. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(13):8427–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dunkman AA, Buckley MR, Mienaltowski MJ, Adams SM, Thomas SJ, Satchell L, et al. Decorin expression is important for age-related changes in tendon structure and mechanical properties. Matrix Biology. 2013;32(1):3–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wiesinger HP, Kosters A, Muller E, Seynnes OR. Effects of Increased Loading on In Vivo Tendon Properties: A Systematic Review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(9):1885–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nurminskaya MV, Birk DE. Differential expression of genes associated with collagen fibril growth in the chicken tendon: identification of structural and regulatory genes by subtractive hybridization. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;350(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kadler KE, Baldock C, Bella J, Boot-Handford RP. Collagens at a glance. Journal of Cell Science. 2007;120(12):1955–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ansorge HL, Meng X, Zhang G, Veit G, Sun M, Klement JF, et al. Type XIV Collagen Regulates Fibrillogenesis: PREMATURE COLLAGEN FIBRIL GROWTH AND TISSUE DYSFUNCTION IN NULL MICE. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(13):8427–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Danielson KG, Baribault H, Holmes DF, Graham H, Kadler KE, Iozzo RV. Targeted disruption of decorin leads to abnormal collagen fibril morphology and skin fragility. J Cell Biol. 1997;136(3):729–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chakravarti S, Magnuson T, Lass JH, Jepsen KJ, LaMantia C, Carroll H. Lumican regulates collagen fibril assembly: skin fragility and corneal opacity in the absence of lumican. J Cell Biol. 1998;141(5):1277–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Svensson L, Aszódi A, Reinholt FP, Fässler R, Heinegård D, Oldberg A. Fibromodulin-null mice have abnormal collagen fibrils, tissue organization, and altered lumican deposition in tendon. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(14):9636–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Piróg KA, Jaka O, Katakura Y, Meadows RS, Kadler KE, Boot-Handford RP, et al. A mouse model offers novel insights into the myopathy and tendinopathy often associated with pseudoachondroplasia and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(1):52–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jones GC, Corps AN, Pennington CJ, Clark IM, Edwards DR, Bradley MM, et al. Expression profiling of metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in normal and degenerate human achilles tendon. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2006;54(3):832–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Deryugina EI, Ratnikov B, Monosov E, Postnova TI, DiScipio R, Smith JW, et al. MT1-MMP initiates activation of pro-MMP-2 and integrin alphavbeta3 promotes maturation of MMP-2 in breast carcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 2001;263(2):209–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Strongin AY, Collier I, Bannikov G, Marmer BL, Grant GA, Goldberg GI. Mechanism of cell surface activation of 72-kDa type IV collagenase. Isolation of the activated form of the membrane metalloprotease. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(10):5331–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wilkinson JM, Davidson RK, Swingler TE, Jones ER, Corps AN, Johnston P, et al. MMP-14 and MMP-2 are key metalloproteases in Dupuytren’s disease fibroblast-mediated contraction. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 2012;1822(6):897–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Taylor SH, Yeung CY, Kalson NS, Lu Y, Zigrino P, Starborg T, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 14 is required for fibrous tissue expansion. Elife. 2015;4:e09345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mochizuki S, Okada Y. ADAMs in cancer cell proliferation and progression. Cancer Sci. 2007;98(5):621–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Del Buono A, Oliva F, Osti L, Maffulli N. Metalloproteases and tendinopathy. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(1):51–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.McPherron AC, Lee SJ. Double muscling in cattle due to mutations in the myostatin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(23):12457–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.McPherron AC, Lawler AM, Lee S-J. Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-p superfamily member. Nature. 1997;387(6628):83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mendias CL, Bakhurin KI, Faulkner JA. Tendons of myostatin-deficient mice are small, brittle, and hypocellular. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(1):388–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Philip B, Lu Z, Gao Y. Regulation of GDF-8 signaling by the p38 MAPK. Cell Signal. 2005;17(3):365–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lee SJ, McPherron AC. Regulation of myostatin activity and muscle growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(16):9306–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Berthet E, Chen C, Butcher K, Schneider RA, Alliston T, Amirtharajah M. Smad3 binds Scleraxis and Mohawk and regulates tendon matrix organization. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(9):1475–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shukunami C, Takimoto A, Oro M, Hiraki Y. Scleraxis positively regulates the expression of tenomodulin, a differentiation marker of tenocytes. Developmental biology. 2006;298(1):234–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tidball JG, Lin C. Structural changes at the myogenic cell surface during the formation of myotendinous junctions. Cell Tissue Res. 1989;257(1):77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ori H, Duque M, Frank Hayward R, Scheibner C, Tian H, Ortiz G, et al. Observation of topological action potentials in engineered tissues. Nature Physics. 2023;19(2):290–6. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Curzi D, Ambrogini P, Falcieri E, Burattini S. Morphogenesis of rat myotendinous junction. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(4):275–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original proteomics data for this study will be made available upon acceptance for publication. All other data that support the findings of this study are available in the methods and results of this article.
