Skip to main content
. 2023 May 26;13:1107237. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1107237

Table 4.

The pooling results of the incidence, therapy and prognosis of CMVR-related RD in aIDS patients.

Category No. of studies Pooled incidence 95% CI P-value I 2 Sensitivity analysis Selected model
Incidence
General RD 10 24% 18% 29% P<0.01 83% Negative Random-effect model
RD at baseline/enrollment 40 13% 10% 16% P<0.01 92% Negative Random-effect model
New RD after anti-CMV therapy 48 12% 10% 14% P<0.01 69% Negative Random-effect model
Therapy choices for RD
PPV with SO or gas tamponade 24 52% 32% 73% P<0.01 97% Negative Random-effect model
Laser 3 25% 4% 54% P<0.01 94% Negative Random-effect model
Scleral buckle 2 19% 9% 30% P=0.28 14% Negative Fixed-effect model
No therapy a 4 46% 32% 60% P=0.14 50% Negative Random-effect model
Anatomic success rate
PPV with SO or gas tamponade 12 89% 85% 93% P=0.07 40% Negative Fixed-effect model
Laser 3 65% 43% 84% P=0.13 52% Negative Random-effect model
SO-dependent eyes 3 26% 0% 92% P<0.01 98% Negative Random-effect model
a

Patients with CMVR-related RD who did not receive any therapy because the retinal reattachment was inoperable or the patients were systemically unwell to undergo surgery.

AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; CI, confidence interval; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CMVR, cytomegalovirus retinitis; PPV, pars plana vitrectomy; RD, retinal detachment; SO, silicone oil.