Table 3.
Results of the Two-Way Analysis of Variance on Dominant Hand Data
| Measures | Axis | Factor | F | p | η2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute mean | X | Session | 1.700 | 0.020 | 0.043 |
| Group | 0.018 | 0.895 | <0.001 | ||
| Group × session | 0.087 | 0.770 | 0.002 | ||
| Y | Session | 1.356 | 0.252 | 0.034 | |
| Group | 0.195 | 0.662 | 0.005 | ||
| Group × session | 2.031 | 0.162 | 0.051 | ||
| Z | Session | 5.572 | 0.023 | 0.128 | |
| Group | 0.050 | 0.824 | 0.001 | ||
| Group × session | 0.736 | 0.396 | 0.019 | ||
| Standard deviation | X | Session | 24.548 | <0.001 | 0.392 |
| Group | 0.140 | 0.710 | 0.004 | ||
| Group × session | 0.496 | 0.485 | 0.013 | ||
| Y | Session | 18.356 | <0.001 | 0.326 | |
| Group | 0.026 | 0.873 | 0.001 | ||
| Group × session | 0.210 | 0.649 | 0.006 | ||
| Z | Session | 21.367 | <0.001 | 0.360 | |
| Group | 0.018 | 0.8942 | <0.001 | ||
| Group × session | 0.728 | 0.399 | 0.019 |
Greenhouse–Geisser correction was used due to violation of the sphericity assumption.