Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;9(2):e003214. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003214

Table 2.

Association of XL9 variants with SLE

Genotype Effect allele Additive model
P value FDR Q* OR (95% CI)
rs9271375A/G A/A A/G G/G A
SLE (n=442) 39 (8.8) 172 (38.9) 231 (52.3) 250 (28.3) 0.051 0.051 0.84 (0.70 to 1.00)
Controls (n=779) 78 (10.0) 344 (44.2) 357 (45.8) 500 (32.1) Referent
rs9271378G/A G/G G/A A/A G
SLE (n=442) 7 (1.6) 84 (19.0) 351 (79.4) 98 (11.1) 0.038 0.051 0.77 (0.59 to 0.98)
Controls (n=779) 16 (2.1) 187 (24.0) 576 (73.9) 219 (14.1) Referent
rs2105898T/G T/T T/G G/G T
SLE (n=442) 48 (10.9) 174 (39.4) 220 (49.8) 270 (30.5) 0.0017 0.0067 1.34 (1.12 to 1.61)
Controls (n=779) 46 (5.9) 291 (37.4) 442 (56.7) 383 (24.6) Referent
rs9271593C/T C/C C/T T/T C
SLE (n=442) 63 (14.3) 202 (45.7) 177 (40.0) 328 (37.1) 0.018 0.037 1.23 (1.04 to 1.46)
Controls (n=779) 83 (10.7) 338 (43.4) 358 (46.0) 504 (32.3) Referent

*Significance level was set at FDR Q<0.05.

FDR, false discovery rate; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.