Skip to main content
. 2023 May 28;23(11):5143. doi: 10.3390/s23115143

Table 6.

Results for each considered signal from the sample rate variation analysis.

Max. Frequency Scale Factor Sampling Rate Time Resolution Total Damage Error
[Hz] [-] [Hz] [s] [%] [%]
Non-stationary signal in section (Damage with standard method = 0.07859)
100 2 200 5.00 × 10−3 0.0526 33.08
100 5 500 2.00 × 10−3 0.07301 7.11
100 10 1000 1.00 × 10−3 0.077311 1.64
100 15 1500 6.67 × 10−4 0.07807 0.67
100 20 2000 5.00 × 10−4 0.0784 0.25
Non-zero mean signal (Damage with standard method = 0.0140)
20 2 40 2.50 × 10−2 0.0075 46.79
20 5 100 1.00 × 10−2 0.0104 25.86
20 10 200 5.00 × 10−3 0.0121 13.75
20 15 300 3.33 × 10−3 0.0141 0.71
20 20 400 2.50 × 10−3 0.0141 0.71
Non-stationary signal in section (Damage with standard method = 0.1699)
36 2 72 1.39 × 10−2 0.0179 89.46
36 5 180 5.56 × 10−3 0.0482 71.63
36 10 360 2.78 × 10−3 0.1496 11.95
36 15 540 1.85 × 10−3 0.17655 3.91
36 20 720 1.39 × 10−3 0.1696 0.17
Bimodal signal (Damage with standard method = 1608)
110 2 220 4.55 × 10−3 0.1064 33.83
110 5 550 1.82 × 10−3 0.14501 9.82
110 10 1100 9.09 × 10−4 0.1537 4.42
110 15 1650 6.06 × 10−4 0.15602 2.97
110 20 2200 4.55 × 10−4 0.156 2.98