Table 6.
Results for each considered signal from the sample rate variation analysis.
| Max. Frequency | Scale Factor | Sampling Rate | Time Resolution | Total Damage | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Hz] | [-] | [Hz] | [s] | [%] | [%] |
| Non-stationary signal in section (Damage with standard method = 0.07859) | |||||
| 100 | 2 | 200 | 5.00 × 10−3 | 0.0526 | 33.08 |
| 100 | 5 | 500 | 2.00 × 10−3 | 0.07301 | 7.11 |
| 100 | 10 | 1000 | 1.00 × 10−3 | 0.077311 | 1.64 |
| 100 | 15 | 1500 | 6.67 × 10−4 | 0.07807 | 0.67 |
| 100 | 20 | 2000 | 5.00 × 10−4 | 0.0784 | 0.25 |
| Non-zero mean signal (Damage with standard method = 0.0140) | |||||
| 20 | 2 | 40 | 2.50 × 10−2 | 0.0075 | 46.79 |
| 20 | 5 | 100 | 1.00 × 10−2 | 0.0104 | 25.86 |
| 20 | 10 | 200 | 5.00 × 10−3 | 0.0121 | 13.75 |
| 20 | 15 | 300 | 3.33 × 10−3 | 0.0141 | 0.71 |
| 20 | 20 | 400 | 2.50 × 10−3 | 0.0141 | 0.71 |
| Non-stationary signal in section (Damage with standard method = 0.1699) | |||||
| 36 | 2 | 72 | 1.39 × 10−2 | 0.0179 | 89.46 |
| 36 | 5 | 180 | 5.56 × 10−3 | 0.0482 | 71.63 |
| 36 | 10 | 360 | 2.78 × 10−3 | 0.1496 | 11.95 |
| 36 | 15 | 540 | 1.85 × 10−3 | 0.17655 | 3.91 |
| 36 | 20 | 720 | 1.39 × 10−3 | 0.1696 | 0.17 |
| Bimodal signal (Damage with standard method = 1608) | |||||
| 110 | 2 | 220 | 4.55 × 10−3 | 0.1064 | 33.83 |
| 110 | 5 | 550 | 1.82 × 10−3 | 0.14501 | 9.82 |
| 110 | 10 | 1100 | 9.09 × 10−4 | 0.1537 | 4.42 |
| 110 | 15 | 1650 | 6.06 × 10−4 | 0.15602 | 2.97 |
| 110 | 20 | 2200 | 4.55 × 10−4 | 0.156 | 2.98 |