Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 26;13(6):358–367. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac081

Table 4.

Sensitivity analyses for university student population size

ICER ACER
(TAILORED)
ACER
(TARGETED)
Weight (kg)
HBHU Sample 5.05 107.82 179.29
Small university 6.15 151.04 256.24
Medium university 3.27 62.63 102.35
Large university 2.95 52.84 85.18
Abdominal circumference reduction (cm)
HBHU Sample 3.49 53.36 70.34
Small university 4.25 74.76 100.52
Medium university 2.26 31.00 40.15
Large university 2.04 26.15 33.42
HDL increase (mg/dL)
HBHU Sample 59.37 160.09 147.48
Small university 72.33 224.27 210.77
Medium university 38.39 93.00 84.19
Large university 34.62 78.84 70.06
SBP (mmHg)
HBHU Sample 1.57 56.81 261.26
Small university 1.92 79.58 373.37
Medium university 1.02 33.00 149.14
Large university 0.92 27.84 124.11
DBP (mmHg)
HBHU Sample 2.64 −98.75 −46.42
Small university 3.21 138.34 −66.34
Medium university 1.71 −57.36 −26.50
Large university 1.54 −48.39 −23.23
HbA1c reduction (%)
HBHU Sample 47.49 1320.75 3048.00
Small university 57.86 1850.25 4356.00
Medium university 30.71 767.25 1740.00
Large university 27.70 647.25 1448.00

Table presents sensitivity analyses per variations in the number of participants estimated to enroll at a small (N = 95/arm), medium (N = 380/arm), or large (N = 570/arm) university.

ICER incremental cost effectiveness ratio (incremental cost [$]/unit change in outcome); SBP systolic blood pressure; DBP diastolic blood pressure.