Table 2.
D > 0 | D < 0 | Total | Mahalanobis d | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDD vs. Control | 2.62961 | <0.001 | |||
MDD | 43 | 6 | 49 | ||
Control | 11 | 35 | 46 | ||
Total | 54 | 41 | |||
sensitivity | specificity | ||||
87.8% | 76.1% | ||||
CFS vs. Control | 6.48905 | <0.001 | |||
CFS | 44 | 0 | 44 | ||
Control | 4 | 42 | 46 | ||
Total | 48 | 42 | |||
sensitivity | specificity | ||||
100% | 91.3% | ||||
MDD vs. CFS | 4.05344 | <0.001 | |||
MDD | 45 | 4 | 49 | ||
CFS | 0 | 44 | 44 | ||
Total | 45 | 48 | |||
sensitivity | specificity | ||||
91.8% | 100% |
MDD: major depressive disorder, CFS: chronic fatigue syndrome, D: discriminant score in linear discriminant analysis, Mahalanobis d: Mahalanobis distance, P: p value for Mahalanobis distance.