Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 May 30;19(5):e1011219. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011219

HIV, asymptomatic STI, and the rectal mucosal immune environment among young men who have sex with men

Vanessa E Van Doren 1,*, S Abigail Smith 1, Yi-Juan Hu 2, Gregory Tharp 3, Steven Bosinger 3,4, Cassie G Ackerley 1, Phillip M Murray 1, Rama R Amara 3,4, Praveen K Amancha 1, Robert A Arthur 5, H Richard Johnston 5, Colleen F Kelley 1,6
Editor: Daniel C Douek7
PMCID: PMC10256205  PMID: 37253061

Abstract

Young men who have sex with men (YMSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV and bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STI) including gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis; yet research into the immunologic effects of these infections is typically pursued in siloes. Here, we employed a syndemic approach to understand potential interactions of these infections on the rectal mucosal immune environment among YMSM. We enrolled YMSM aged 18–29 years with and without HIV and/or asymptomatic bacterial STI and collected blood, rectal secretions, and rectal tissue biopsies. YMSM with HIV were on suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) with preserved blood CD4 cell counts. We defined 7 innate and 19 adaptive immune cell subsets by flow cytometry, the rectal mucosal transcriptome by RNAseq, and the rectal mucosal microbiome by 16S rRNA sequencing and examined the effects of HIV and STI and their interactions. We measured tissue HIV RNA viral loads among YMSM with HIV and HIV replication in rectal explant challenge experiments among YMSM without HIV. HIV, but not asymptomatic STI, was associated with profound alterations in the cellular composition of the rectal mucosa. We did not detect a difference in the microbiome composition associated with HIV, but asymptomatic bacterial STI was associated with a higher probability of presence of potentially pathogenic taxa. When examining the rectal mucosal transcriptome, there was evidence of statistical interaction; asymptomatic bacterial STI was associated with upregulation of numerous inflammatory genes and enrichment for immune response pathways among YMSM with HIV, but not YMSM without HIV. Asymptomatic bacterial STI was not associated with differences in tissue HIV RNA viral loads or in HIV replication in explant challenge experiments. Our results suggest that asymptomatic bacterial STI may contribute to inflammation particularly among YMSM with HIV, and that future research should examine potential harms and interventions to reduce the health impact of these syndemic infections.

Author summary

Young men who have sex with men (YMSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV and asymptomatic bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STI) including gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis. However, the health effects of these infections are not typically studied together. In this study, we enrolled YMSM ages 18–29 with and without HIV and/or asymptomatic bacterial STI to study the immunologic effects of these infections, and their interactions, on the rectal mucosa. We found that HIV was associated with differences in the cellular make-up of the rectal tissues, and that STI was associated with an increase in the detection of potentially dangerous bacteria in the rectum. When we examined tissue gene expression, we found that STI was associated with inflammation only among YMSM with HIV, but not those without HIV. We did not see an effect of STI on differences in tissue viral loads among YMSM with HIV or in HIV replication in rectal explant experiments in YMSM without HIV. Our results suggest that asymptomatic bacterial STI may contribute to inflammation particularly among YMSM with HIV, and that future research should examine potential harms and interventions to reduce the health impact of these syndemic infections.

Introduction

HIV and bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STI), including gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis, are disproportionately concentrated among young men who have sex with men (YMSM), particularly racial and ethnic minority YMSM attributed to the pervasive social inequities and discrimination facing this population [1]. In 2019 in the United States, men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 69% of new HIV diagnoses, and 21% of these were among young people aged 13–24 [2]. The burden of bacterial STI is also profound among YMSM. People aged 15–24 years make up a quarter of the United States population but accounted for 61% of chlamydial infections in 2020 [3] and nearly half of new STIs every year [4]. In the United States, syphilis cases have increased 52% since 2016 with MSM and racial/ethnic minorities again disproportionately impacted [3]. However, research and interventions to control and improve outcomes for HIV and STI are commonly siloed as separate entities, which can hinder progress. Syndemic theory provides a framework to study co-occurring infections (e.g., HIV and bacterial STI) to better understand the pathways through which they interact biologically and potentially increase their negative overall health burden on a population [5,6]. Therefore, a more holistic approach to improving health for YMSM will consider the impact and interactions of these infections.

The gut mucosa is a critical site for both HIV transmission and immunopathogenesis. Approximately 70% of HIV infections in MSM are thought to occur via exposure during receptive anal intercourse (RAI), which has an 18-fold and 50-fold higher HIV transmission probability per exposure event when compared to vaginal or penile exposure, respectively [7]. While effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has resulted in remarkable improvements in morbidity and mortality, HIV infection results in profound, chronic perturbations to the immune system that are particularly evident in the gut [8]. Similarly, the gut, and rectum in particular, is an important site for acquisition of bacterial STI among MSM. Approximately 85% of bacterial STIs in the rectum are asymptomatic, underpinning the CDC recommendation to screen for asymptomatic bacterial STI in sexually active MSM with multiple partners every 3 months [9]. Among MSM without HIV, bacterial STI has been associated with increased acquisition of HIV, thought to be mediated through inflammation including compromised mucosal integrity, local recruitment of HIV target cells, and disruption of the local cytokine milieu [7,10]. Among MSM with HIV, the health effects of asymptomatic bacterial STI are less studied but could result in amplification of chronic inflammation through similar mechanisms and/or increases in tissue HIV replication, further entrenching the HIV reservoir in the critical gut compartment [11].

Because of their elevated risk of HIV acquisition, YMSM also face an increased burden of associated chronic inflammation over their lifetime [12]. They also face an elevated risk of bacterial STI acquisition. The inflammatory impact of bacterial STI, and whether this is exacerbated in the setting of concomitant HIV, is not yet fully elucidated. Given the syndemic burden of both HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI among YMSM, we undertook this study to better understand the immunologic effects of these infections and their interaction on the rectal mucosal immune environment including the cellular composition, transcriptome, and microbiome. We chose to focus on four populations of YMSM: those without HIV, those with HIV on ART, and those with and without asymptomatic bacterial STI to evaluate both the impact of each of these diseases in isolation as well as their potential multiplicative effects. We hypothesized that asymptomatic bacterial STI would be associated with rectal mucosal inflammation among YMSM without HIV and that the baseline immunologic perturbations in the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV would be augmented by the inflammatory effects of asymptomatic bacterial STI. A comprehensive characterization of the immunologic effects of both HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI on the rectal mucosa of YMSM will advance our understanding of the syndemic health burden of these infections and could illuminate pathways for new interventions to reduce their impact on this marginalized and underserved population.

Results

The clinical cohort

A total of 105 YMSM were enrolled into a cross-sectional study with peripheral blood and rectal mucosal sampling including collection of swabs for secretions and pinch biopsies, both via rigid sigmoidoscopy. We enrolled 14 YMSM with HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI, 15 YMSM with HIV and without asymptomatic bacterial STI, 28 YMSM without HIV and with asymptomatic bacterial STI, and 48 YMSM without HIV and without asymptomatic bacterial STI. Demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. All participants were aged 18–29 years and in good health. Participants with asymptomatic STI were diagnosed with rectal gonorrhea (GC), chlamydia (CT), and/or latent syphilis (TP) prior to mucosal sampling, and appropriate antibiotic treatment was provided immediately after study sampling. Participants with HIV were well-controlled on ART (median CD4 = 635 cells/uL, median viral load (VL)<20 copies/mL), and a minority of participants without HIV were taking oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The majority of participants across groups had positive serologies for cytomegalovirus (CMV). HSV-2 was more prevalent among YMSM with HIV, and there was no difference in HSV-1 positivity between groups. Participants reported similar numbers of receptive anal intercourse partners in the last 12 months across groups.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants included in the study.

Characteristic HIVposSTIpos n = 14 HIVposSTIneg n = 15 HIVnegSTIpos n = 28 HIVnegSTIneg n = 48 p-value
Median age in years (range) 22 (18–29) 22 (19–26) 21 (18–28) 21 (18–24) 0.04*
Race n (%) 0.3
 White 0 (0%) 2 (13.3%) 1 (3.6%) 4 (8.3%)
 Black 14 (100%) 12 (80%) 26 (92.9%) 44 (91.7%)
 Other 0 (0%) 1 (6.7%) 1 (3.7%) 0 (0%)
CD4 (cells/uL): median (range) 608 (232–1706) 657 (403–1370) N/A N/A 0.3
Plasma viral load (copies/mL): median (range) <20 (<20–279) <20 (<20–95) N/A N/A 0.4
HSV-1+ n (%) 7 (50%) 12 (80%) 18 (64.3%) 22 (45.8%) 0.09
HSV-2+ n (%) 10 (71.4%) 11 (78.6%) 6 (21.4%) 6 (12.5%) <0.01*
CMV+ n (%) 14 (100%) 15 (100%) 26 (92.9%) 43 (89.6%) 0.5
GC+ n (%) 4 (28.6%) N/A 8 (29%) N/A 1
CT+ n (%) 4 (28.6%) N/A 10 (35.7%) N/A 0.6
TP+ n (%) 1 (7.1%) N/A 2 (7%) N/A 1
Multiple STI+ n (%) 5 (35.7%) N/A 8 (29%) N/A 0.6
# of partners in past 12 months n (%) 0.6
0–5 9 (64.3%) 7 (46.7%) 19 (67.9%) 31 (64.6%)
6–20 5 (34.7%) 7 (46.7%) 7 (25%) 16 (33.3%)
21+ 0 (0%) 1 (6.7%) 2 (7.1%) 1 (2.1%)
On PrEP n (%) N/A N/A 4 (14.3%) 2 (4.2%) 0.1

HIVpos = YMSM with HIV; HIVneg = YMSM without HIV; STIpos = YMSM with STI; STIneg = YMSM without STI; HSV-1 = herpes simplex virus 1; HSV-2 = herpes simplex virus 2; CMV = cytomegalovirus; GC = Neisseria gonorrhea; CT = Chlamydia trachomatis; TP = Treponema pallidum/syphilis; PrEP = pre-exposure prophylaxis; * = p < 0.05.

The cellular composition of the rectal mucosa among YMSM with HIV demonstrated profound differences as compared to YMSM without HIV, but with little impact of asymptomatic STI

A total of 23 immune cell subsets were characterized by flow cytometry in blood and 26 subsets were characterized with rectal mucosal tissue samples as described in S1 Table, including innate [neutrophils, monocyte/macrophages, myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, Natural Killer cells (NK), γδ T cells, and mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAIT)] and adaptive [B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells] immune cell subsets. T cells were further characterized based on naïve vs memory phenotype (CD45RA, CCR7), tissue residence (CD69+CD103+/-), HIV susceptibility marker expression (CCR5, a4ß7, Ki67), regulatory phenotype (FOXP3+CD25+), and cytokine production upon mitogen stimulation (IL17A, IFNγ, TNFα).

Given our modest sample size and multiple parameter outcomes of interest, we first used discovery-based linear decomposition modeling (LDM), which is a single analysis pathway that combines both global tests of effect as well as tests of individual outcomes and allows for inclusion of all four study groups into a single model that controls for multiple comparisons [13]. LDM also enables the inclusion of interaction terms to assess for effect modification. In this case, we were interested in interaction between HIV and STI, meaning that the effect of STI on immune cell subsets could differ based on the participant’s HIV status. If significant interaction is identified, stratified analyses are indicated to determine the nature of the interaction. In this case, significant interaction between HIV and STI was not present in either the blood (p = 0.8) or rectal mucosal (p = 0.1) cell subset analyses, and stratified analyses were not pursued.

Because there was no interaction detected, we next conducted LDM global tests of significance with all four study groups included in the model. The LDM global test of significance evaluating the effect of asymptomatic STI, controlling for HIV status, was significant (p = 0.02) for blood cell subsets and marginally significant (p = 0.06) for rectal mucosal cell subsets. In contrast, the LDM global test of significance evaluating the effect of HIV was highly significant for both blood (p = 0.001) and rectal mucosa (p = 0.0002).

Two-dimensional principal coordinates analyses (PCoAs) were constructed to better visualize global differences in cell subsets between YMSM with and without HIV. Blood data are presented in Fig 1, and rectal mucosal data are presented in Fig 2. Similar to the LDM results, significant separation was seen between YMSM with and without HIV in both blood (Fig 1B; p = 0.003 by PERMANOVA) and rectal mucosa (Fig 2B; p = 0.0002 by PERMANOVA), controlling for STI status. There was no significant separation by STI status, controlling for HIV (Fig 1A; p = 0.4 for blood and Fig 2A; p = 0.1 for rectal mucosa by PERMANOVA). Given the minimal effect detected for asymptomatic STI on global cellular subsets in blood and rectal mucosa, we concentrated further analyses on the effect of HIV.

Fig 1. Peripheral blood immune cell subsets in YMSM with and without HIV and asymptomatic rectal STI.

Fig 1

Twenty-three innate and adaptive cell subsets from peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) There was no significant separation between YMSM with and without asymptomatic STI as analyzed by PERMANOVA. Purple dots represent STI-positive YMSM; green triangles represent STI-negative YMSM. (B) Significant separation was seen between YMSM with and without HIV. Pink dots represent HIV-positive YMSM; teal triangles represent HIV-negative YMSM. (C) After adjusting for STI, linear decomposition modeling (LDM) identified four cell subsets that were significantly (FDR<5%) different between YMSM with and without HIV. Cell subset percentages were log transformed for analyses. HIVpos = YMSM with HIV; HIVneg = YMSM without HIV.

Fig 2. Rectal mucosal immune cell subsets in YMSM with and without HIV and asymptomatic rectal STI.

Fig 2

Twenty-six innate and adaptive cell subsets from rectal mucosal tissues were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) There was no significant separation between YMSM with and without asymptomatic STI as analyzed by PERMANOVA. Purple dots represent STI-positive YMSM; green triangles represent STI-negative YMSM. (B) Significant separation was seen between YMSM with and without HIV. Pink dots represent HIV-positive YMSM; teal triangles represent HIV-negative YMSM. (C) After adjusting for STI, LDM identified 17 cell subsets that were significantly (FDR<5%) different between YMSM with and without HIV. Cell subset percentages were log transformed for analyses. HIVpos = YMSM with HIV; HIVneg = YMSM without HIV.

Next, using LDM to assess differences between groups in individual cell subsets, we identified four subsets that were significantly different in blood between YMSM with and without HIV, including an increased percentage of CD8+ IFNγ T cells and γδ T cells and a decreased proportion of CD4+ memory and CD4+ memory CCR5+ T cells among YMSM with HIV (Fig 1C; padj<0.05). We also noted expected differences in other cell subsets such as a decrease in the percentage of total CD4+ T cells and increased percentage of total CD8+ T cells in the blood of YMSM with HIV, but these did not meet our stringent adjusted p-value cut-off. In contrast, there were 17 individual cell subsets that were significantly different in the rectal mucosa between YMSM with and without HIV (Fig 2C; padj<0.05). Among CD8+ T cell subsets, the proportion of total, memory, non-tissue-resident memory (TRM), IFNγ+, TNFα+, and Ki67+ cell subsets were significantly increased in the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV. In addition, neutrophil, γδ T cell, and MAIT cell subsets were also increased in the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV. Among CD4+ T cell subsets, total, memory, CCR5+ memory, IFNγ+, TNFα+, and TRM cell subsets were significantly decreased in the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV. In addition, the percentage of CD56+CD16- NK cells was also decreased in the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV.

Compared to YMSM without STI, the microbiome composition of YMSM with asymptomatic bacterial rectal STI demonstrated a higher probability of presence of taxa with pathogenic potential and decrease in commensal gut flora

Rectal mucosal swabs were collected during rigid sigmoidoscopy for 16S rRNA sequencing of the gut microbiome (n = 102). Similar to cellular analyses, there was no significant interaction identified between HIV and STI for microbiome outcomes, so stratified analyses were not conducted. After adjusting for sequencing batch effect and STI, there were no significant differences between the microbiome compositions of YMSM with and without HIV in alpha diversity (Chao1 p = 0.3, Shannon p = 0.09), beta diversity (Bray-Curtis p = 0.3, Jaccard p = 0.05), global relative abundance (LDM padj = 0.2), or presence-absence (padj = 0.05). After adjusting for sequencing batch and HIV, there were also no significant differences between the microbiome compositions of YMSM with and without STI in alpha (Chao1 p = 0.8, Shannon p = 0.8) or beta diversity (Bray-Curtis p = 0.08, Jaccard p = 0.1). When analyzing taxa-level outcomes by LDM, relative abundance and presence-absence results differed between YMSM with and without STI in expected ways; the genus Neisseria was significantly more abundant (padj = 0.002), and both Neisseria (padj = 0.001) and Chlamydia (padj = 0.003) genera had higher probabilities of presence in YMSM with STI.

We noted that a small number of participants demonstrated discordant Chlamydia or Neisseria genera detected on the 16S rRNA sequencing results as compared to the clinical diagnostic assay (n = 16). We thus reexamined the data by limiting our analyses to the specimens with Chlamydia or Neisseria genera detected on both the clinical assay and 16S rRNA sequencing (n = 86) in order to focus on patients that were most likely to represent true, clinically relevant infection. Once again, there was no significant interaction between HIV and STI, and we did not see significant effects of HIV on the microbiome after controlling for sequencing batch and STI (S2 Fig). However, we did find additional significant effects of STI on the microbiome while adjusting for batch and HIV in this restricted sample set (Fig 3). Alpha diversity metrics (Chao1 p = 0.6, Shannon p = 0.7) were not significantly different between YMSM with and without STI, but beta diversity by both Bray-Curtis (p = 0.03) and Jaccard (p = 0.02) similarity measures were significantly different between YMSM with and without STI (Fig 3C & 3D). The LDM based on global relative abundance data was also significantly different (padj = 0.03) between the two groups, and Neisseria remained the only genus that had a significantly higher relative abundance (padj = 0.003) in YMSM with STI. The global LDM statistic based on presence-absence analyses was also significant (padj = 0.04). In contrast to the initial evaluation of the full dataset, this re-evaluation of the limited concordant dataset identified 11 genera with a significantly different (padj<0.1) probability of presence between YMSM with and without STI. As expected, the genera Neisseria and Chlamydia again had a higher probability of presence among YMSM with STI controlling for sequencing batch and HIV. Five other potentially pathogenic bacteria—Sneathia, Staphylococcus, Bulleidia, Haemophilus, and unspecified genera from the Corynebacteriaceae familyalso had a higher probability of presence in YMSM with STI. Unspecified genera from the Ruminococcaceae family as well as the genera Parabacteroides, Oscillibacter, and Phocea, all of which are commensal gut bacteria, had a lower probability of presence in YMSM with STI (Fig 3E & 3F). Of note, while there were no differences between the four study groups detected, two of the microbiome specimens from YMSM with STI and without HIV (one with GC and one with CT) appeared to be dominated by the Shigella genus. Examination of cellular subsets did not show these two specimens to be clear outliers, and additional analyses are ongoing given the relatively high prevalence of this taxa in our cohort overall.

Fig 3. Rectal mucosal microbiome composition in YMSM with and without STI.

Fig 3

(A) Representative bar plot of the top 10 phyla identified by 16S rRNA sequencing from rectal mucosal specimens of the 86 participants with concordant clinical diagnostic assay and 16S microbiome sequencing STI results. (B) Representative bar plot of the top 10 genera identified by 16S rRNA sequencing from rectal mucosal specimens of the 86 participants with concordant clinical diagnostic assay and 16S microbiome sequencing STI results. (C) Bray-Curtis and (D) Jaccard measures of beta diversity, both measured by PERMANOVA, both demonstrated significant differences between the microbiome composition of YMSM with and without STI. Purple dots represent STI-positive YMSM; green dots represent STI-negative YMSM. (E & F) Presence-absence analyses identified 11 genera with a significantly different (FDR<10%) probability of presence between the two groups. STIpos = YMSM with asymptomatic rectal bacterial STI; STIneg = YMSM without asymptomatic rectal bacterial STI.

Asymptomatic bacterial STI was associated with differential expression of inflammatory genes and pathways only in the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV

Total RNA was extracted from rectal pinch biopsies and utilized for bulk transcriptome analyses from 43 participants in the cohort. In contrast to our cellular subsets and microbiome analyses, in this case, the LDM identified evidence of significant interaction between HIV and STI in gene expression profiles of the rectal mucosa (p = 0.008), revealing a differential effect of bacterial STI on the rectal mucosal transcriptome between YMSM with and without HIV. This interaction was attributed to 47 gene transcripts. Due to the significant interaction identified, we next conducted stratified analyses of the four study groups with DESeq2 and visualized the differences in study groups by volcano plot (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Asymptomatic bacterial STI is associated with differential gene expression among YMSM with HIV only.

Fig 4

(A-D) Volcano plots of differentially expressed genes in the four study groups. Red dots indicate genes with significant (padj<0.1) differential expression. (E) List of 40 genes that were identified both as interaction genes and as differentially expressed among YMSM with HIV and rectal asymptomatic bacterial STI. STIpos = YMSM with asymptomatic bacterial STI; STIneg = YMSM without asymptomatic bacterial STI. HIVpos = YMSM with HIV; HIVneg = YMSM without HIV.

Among YMSM without STI, 23 genes were significantly (padj<0.1) differentially expressed between YMSM with and without HIV (Fig 4A), five of which (HSPB7, B3GNT3, AHNAK2, TMEM47, and COL28A1) were also among the 47 significant interaction genes identified. Among YMSM with STI, 23 genes were significantly (padj<0.1) differentially expressed between YMSM with and without HIV (Fig 4B), six of which (DMBT1, C4BPA, C4BPB, ZNF132, CASP5, and TNIP3) were also among the 47 significant interaction genes. The genes that were significant in both the global interaction and stratified analyses all contribute to immune function and regulation [1418] or tissue homeostasis [1922].

We then stratified by HIV status and examined the effect of STI on the rectal mucosal transcriptome. Among YMSM without HIV, no genes were significantly differentially expressed in the rectal mucosa between YMSM with and without STI (Fig 4C). Among YMSM with HIV, however, asymptomatic bacterial STI was associated with significant upregulation of 323 and downregulation of 109 genes (Fig 4D), which is nearly 19 times more differential expression than was seen when evaluating the effect of HIV on YMSM with and without STI. Forty of the 47 significant interaction genes from the global interaction analysis were also significant in this stratified analysis (Fig 4E). Nearly all of these genes are involved in inflammation (e.g., CASP5, MAPK6, TRIM40, TRIM25, TNIP3, PLAUR, C4BPA, C4BPB, TNFSF10, B3GNT3, DMBT1, XDH, IRS2, UPP1, NT5C3A, CFLAR, MXD1, SEMA4B, ST3GAL4, PLAC8, CEACAM5), cell migration (e.g., RAPH1, ARL14, BAIAP2L1), or mucosal integrity (e.g. MUC13, CLDN23, ANGPTL4, FHL2, KIAA1211, ABHD11-AS1, LMO7, HK2).

To further characterize the differential effect of asymptomatic STI on the rectal mucosal transcriptome between YMSM with and without HIV, Gene Set Enrichment Analyses (GSEA) were then undertaken with the Molecular Signatures Hallmark and Reactome Pathway Databases [23]. These analyses demonstrated significant differential upregulation of many important inflammatory pathways within the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV and STI (Fig 5) that was not apparent in the rectal mucosa of YMSM without HIV and with STI, further supporting a distinctive effect of asymptomatic bacterial STI based on HIV status. Because only a few genes were differentially expressed in our stratified analyses evaluating the effect of HIV in YMSM with and without STI, we did not pursue further pathway analyses.

Fig 5. Asymptomatic bacterial STI is associated with upregulation of transcriptomic pathways involved in inflammation and mucosal injury and repair among YMSM with HIV.

Fig 5

Gene set enrichment analyses were conducted using the (A) Hallmark gene set and (B) Reactome gene set. Red dots represent pathways that are upregulated and purple dots represent pathways that are downregulated. The size of the dot corresponds to the nominal p-value.

There was no significant effect of asymptomatic bacterial STI on in vivo or ex vivo HIV replication in rectal tissues

For YMSM with HIV, HIV-1 viral RNA was quantified in both rectal biopsy tissue and serum specimens. We compared rectal and serum viral loads between YMSM with HIV and with and without STI using a one-sided t-test and found no significant difference between these groups. For YMSM without HIV who were not taking PrEP, we performed rectal mucosal ex vivo explant challenge experiments and compared p24 production in the supernatant over 18 days between YMSM with and without STI. The median log area under the curve (logAUC) was calculated for each YMSM without HIV, and no significant difference was found in the logAUCs between those with and without STI (Fig 6).

Fig 6. There is no significant effect of asymptomatic rectal STI on HIV replication in blood or rectal tissues.

Fig 6

HIV viral loads in (A) plasma and (B) rectal tissues among YMSM with HIV. Orange circles represent YMSM with HIV and without STI. Red squares represent YMSM with HIV and with STI. (C) Plot of p24 concentrations from rectal explant challenge experiments among YMSM without HIV and not on oral PrEP. Green circles represent YMSM without HIV and without STI. Blue squares represent YMSM without HIV and with STI.

Discussion

Here, we have comprehensively characterized the rectal mucosal immune effects of the syndemic infections of HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI that disproportionately affect YMSM. We found profound alterations in the rectal mucosal cellular composition among YMSM with HIV despite suppressive ART and preserved systemic CD4+ T cell counts. While we hypothesized that asymptomatic bacterial STI would be associated with rectal mucosal inflammation in both YMSM with and without HIV, our data showed differential effects based on HIV status in the rectal mucosal transcriptome. We also showed that the presence of asymptomatic rectal GC and/or CT was associated with increased probability of presence of other pathogenic taxa in the microbiome. The additive effects of the HIV-related rectal mucosal cellular composition changes plus the STI-related microbiome shift could have contributed to our finding of rectal mucosal inflammation in the transcriptome among YMSM with both HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI.

In the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV, we saw rectal mucosal enrichment of CD8+ T cells, Ki67+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells, MAIT cells, and neutrophils and depletion of CD4+ and CD4+ CCR5+ T cells, which is consistent with prior research [2429]. We also found that CD69-CD103- (non-tissue-resident) CD8+ T cells were enriched and CD56+CD16- NK cells and CD69+ CD4+ T cells were depleted in YMSM with HIV. These findings highlight that HIV perturbs components of both the innate and adaptive immune systems in the gut cellular compartment even in the setting of effective ART [2427,29,30]. It is also notable that all participants in this study were healthy, relatively young, and on suppressive ART with preserved peripheral CD4 T cell counts. While others have also observed, for example, NK depletion within the gut in an older cohort of people with HIV (median age of 47 years), this was only in the absence of antiviral therapy [30]. Significant depletion of gut NK was evident in our cohort of younger individuals on ART. We did not identify effects on the cellular composition of the rectal mucosa associated with asymptomatic bacterial STI regardless of HIV status, which was a somewhat unexpected result. Different results might be seen in the setting of symptomatic proctitis associated with STI, but the immunologic effects of asymptomatic bacterial STI may be too subtle to detect by flow cytometry and may require more sensitive methods.

Evidence of STI-associated inflammation in the rectal mucosal transcriptome of YMSM was only apparent among YMSM with HIV. Our findings could have implications for the increased risk of chronic inflammation-related disease associated with HIV and highlight the essential contributions of the syndemic research approach [31]. This may be particularly relevant for YMSM with HIV and recurrent rectal STI, which is a frequent clinical experience [3234]. Our study showed upregulation of the gene PLAUR in YMSM with HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI. The soluble receptor that this gene codes for, suPAR, is a biomarker of inflammation seen in numerous disease states. High suPAR levels have been associated with non-AIDS events in people with HIV [35]. C4BP, another gene of interest shown to be upregulated in the rectal mucosa of YMSM with HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI, has previously been shown to be elevated in people with HIV and represents a proposed mechanism for the increased thrombosis risk in HIV [36]. CASP5 was also enriched among YMSM with HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI; caspase cascades are an important mediator of inflammatory responses and have been implicated in HIV-associated neurodegeneration [37]. Our pathway analyses further supported an enhanced inflammatory response in the setting of asymptomatic bacterial STI among YMSM with HIV compared to YMSM without HIV and suggest this should be explored as a contributor to chronic inflammation in people with HIV.

Our findings of increased inflammation associated with asymptomatic STI among YMSM with HIV may also have important implications for HIV cure efforts as inflammation is thought to entrench the HIV reservoir [11], and gut reservoir entrenchment in particular is a major barrier to cure efforts [38]. In YMSM with HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI, we found upregulation of several genes with potential roles in HIV reservoir maintenance including those associated with antiviral immunity, HIV replication, and T cell homeostasis such as TRIM25, TRIM40, MAPK6, and TNFSF10 [3944]. While we did not detect a difference in tissue HIV viral loads in our study, future research will be necessary to fully understand the effects of asymptomatic rectal STI on the gut HIV reservoir in people with HIV.

We showed that asymptomatic bacterial STI in YMSM without HIV is not associated with transcriptional or immunologic markers of rectal mucosal inflammation, which represents a significant contribution to the current knowledge of rectal STI pathogenesis. Prior studies have assessed in vitro, cervical, and urethral inflammation in the setting of bacterial STI [4547], but rectal mucosal inflammation attributed to bacterial STI has been understudied to date despite the tremendous burden of rectal STI. Broadly, mucosal GC and/or CT infection have been associated with enhanced cervical Th2 response [46] and higher urethral IL-8 [46] as well as IL-6 and TNFα [47] in the male and female genital tract. One prior study of asymptomatic rectal CT infection among MSM with and without HIV also showed no evidence of enhanced inflammation with a limited number of biomarkers assessed, which is overall consistent with our data [48]. Given our limited sample size and the presence of co-infections in our cohort, we were unable to examine the individual effects of asymptomatic GC, CT, or syphilis, and it is possible that inflammatory effects differ between these asymptomatic infections.

Asymptomatic bacterial STI was associated with a microbiome shift away from commensal gut flora and towards detection of potential pathogens regardless of HIV status in our study. Sneathia, which was enriched among YMSM with bacterial STI in our study, presence in the vaginal microbiome has been associated with adverse reproductive and perinatal outcomes, and prior studies have demonstrated an association between Sneathia colonization and both vaginal STIs and HIV [49]. The Staphylococcus and Haemophilus genera as well as unspecified genera from the Corynebacteriaceae family were also enriched among YMSM with bacterial STI and are capable of causing clinical infection if they gain access to sterile sites via compromised membranes or structures. Gastrointestinal Staphylococcus aureus carriage, in particular, has been associated with subsequent systemic infection [50].

Generally, pathogenic colonization of the gastrointestinal tract and displacement of commensal gut bacteria can instigate chronic inflammation by increasing the pro-inflammatory potential of the intestinal microbiota [51], and the gut microbiome has been shown to modify the bioactivity of rectal toll-like receptor ligands such as LPS [52,53]. The only other known study of the effect of STI on the rectal microbiome found a shift towards anaerobic taxa in the presence of STI [54], but this study differed from ours in that it included individuals with symptomatic STI (18–65% depending on the STI) who were older than our study population (mean age in the 30s).

We did not detect an effect of HIV on the microbiome in this relatively homogenous population of YMSM. In prior studies, the effects of HIV on the microbiome have been inconsistent due to various confounding factors including sexual behaviors [55]. Other clinical factors absent in our study participants, such as having acute HIV infection [56], advanced HIV disease [57], low CD4 nadir [58], suboptimal immune recovery on ART [59], older age [60], and/or men who have sex with women (MSW) [61] have been associated with microbiome differences among people with HIV. We hypothesize that the young age, similar behaviors and demographics, preserved peripheral CD4 counts, and moderate sample size of our cohort likely contributed to the lack of differences in microbiome composition in our study.

Several studies of rhesus macaques have found that the rectal microbiome composition affects SIV acquisition [6264]. Prior work [65,66] has also shown that asymptomatic rectal STI is associated with HIV seroconversion even in the setting of routine screening and treatment, which suggests that ongoing mucosal inflammation associated with asymptomatic STI could increase susceptibility to HIV. In our prior studies utilizing the explant challenge model to approximate HIV acquisition and early replication, we found increased p24 production was associated with differences in rectal mucosal cellular composition and the transcriptome [67]. Given the lack of immunologic effects of asymptomatic bacterial STI on either the cellular composition or the transcriptome in YMSM without HIV, the lack of differences in p24 production is not surprising and suggests that prior epidemiologic associations between asymptomatic STI and HIV acquisition may be confounded by behavioral factors. We also did not observe significant differences in rectal tissue HIV viral loads in YMSM with HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI despite evidence of inflammation in the rectal mucosal transcriptome. It is possible that participant diversity in both viral (e.g., viral diversity between participants, time of infection, peak viral load) and bacterial (e.g., bacterial diversity, time of infection, bacterial load) factors obfuscated our ability to identify a direct association between HIV replication and STI. Of note, the STI-related microbiome differences that we saw involved different taxa than those identified in the nonhuman primate studies and, thus, may not imply the same effect on SIV/HIV acquisition.

Our study sample size was modest and lacked statistical power to assess all possible immunologic associations or to stratify by STI pathogen. We also had limited clinical data on participants particularly with respect to duration of HIV, nadir CD4 count, or ART regimens. Nonetheless, we examined a large number of immunologic outcomes. We also utilized robust statistical methods to control for multiple comparisons, which could obscure some outcomes. We intentionally focused our study on asymptomatic bacterial STI as this represents the majority of infections in clinical practice. Symptomatic proctitis likely represents a different, pro-inflammatory state. Our study focused on YMSM with HIV on effective ART. Older MSM or YMSM with uncontrolled HIV likely have very different immunologic phenotypes and could have different responses to asymptomatic bacterial STI. We included diverse asymptomatic bacterial infections (GC, CT, TP, and coinfection) in this analysis due to sample size limitations. We conducted exploratory analyses to determine whether any differences were evident between the individual pathogens and saw no evidence for this in our analyses; however, statistical power to detect differences was extremely limited.

Our work contributes valuable information to the immunopathogenesis of asymptomatic bacterial STI in the rectal mucosa of YMSM and identifies an important syndemic interaction between HIV and STI in YMSM. It is essential to understand host immune responses to both HIV and asymptomatic bacterial STI, as well as the multiplicative interactions between them, to address the full spectrum of care for these conditions including interventions for prevention, treatment, and cure. Our findings provide a basis for future studies evaluating whether STI treatment alters systemic inflammation in people with HIV, whether asymptomatic bacterial STI in YMSM affects the rectal mucosal immune environment as those patients age, and whether frequent rectal STI among YMSM with HIV results in development of other co-morbidities or represents another potential barrier to HIV cure.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Emory University (approval numbers: IRB00092959 and IRB000094847). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

The clinical cohort

YMSM aged 18–29 years in good overall health with and without untreated asymptomatic rectal gonorrhea, chlamydia, and/or early latent syphilis were recruited from the Atlanta community regardless of HIV status. YMSM living with HIV included in this analysis were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with plasma viral load <300 copies/ml (median<20 copies/ml) and CD4 counts >200 (median = 635). After providing written informed consent, participants underwent peripheral blood and rectal biopsy and secretion sampling via rigid sigmoidoscopy as previously described [55]. Treatment of the bacterial STI was provided after the sampling procedures. All participants were asked to abstain from receptive anal intercourse for seven days after biopsy procedures to allow the mucosa to heal and to complete the antibiotic course for YMSM with STI. All participants were educated about pre-exposure prophylaxis and HIV treatment and referred to services as needed. Please see S1 Fig for a summary of study methods.

Blood and rectal mucosal mononuclear cell phenotyping

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected via CPT tubes, and six pinch biopsies from the rectal mucosa were processed by collagenase digestion to separate mucosal mononuclear cells (MMCs) as described previously [68]. Briefly, mononuclear cells isolated from the blood and rectal biopsies were stained with three staining panels to quantify immune cell subsets of interest: Panel 1 (LIVE/DEAD Aqua, CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD69, CD103, CD25, CCR7, a4b7, CCR5, Ki67, FOXP3), Panel 2 (LIVE/DEAD Aqua, CD45, CD3, CD8, HLADR, CD20, CD16, CD56, CD66b, CD123, CD1c, CD11c, and CD14 [PBMC] or CD163 [rectal]), and Panel 3 (LIVE/DEAD Aqua, CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, TCR g/d, TCR Va7.2, CD161, CCR5, a4b7, IL-17, TNFα, IFNγ) which was stained after stimulation in with 200 ng/ml of PMA and 1 μg/ml of Ionamycin in the presence of Brefeldin A (5 μg/ml; Sigma) and Golgi stop (0.5 μl/ml; BD Pharmingen) and 4 hour incubation at 37°C, while γδ T cells and MAIT cells were quantified via unstimulated cells. Events were acquired on the LSR-Fortessa platform and analyzed with Flowjo software (Treestar Inc. CA). We used the gating strategies previously reported by our group for these analyses [60,67] and depicted in S3S5 Figs.

Microbiota sequencing

Swabs of the rectal mucosa were collected prior to biopsy through the sigmoidoscope at approximately 8–10 cm from the anal verge and stored at −80°C. DNA was extracted, amplified, and sequenced using methods described previously [69]. Briefly, DNA is extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit. Libraries are made using a modification of the Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation workflow. 12.5 ng of DNA is amplified using 16S Amplicon PCR Forward and Reverse Primers. Libraries are purified with Ampure XP beads. Purified amplicons are indexed with Nextera XT Index primers, and indexed amplicons are purified with Ampure XP beads. Final 16S libraries are approximately 630 bp and are pooled in equal amounts based on fluorescence quantification. Final library pools are quantitated via qPCR. The pooled library is sequenced on an Ilumina MiSeq using MiSeq v3 600 cycle chemistry at a loading density of 6–8 pM with 20% PhiX, generating roughly 20 million, 300 bp paired-end reads. Recommended sequencing depth is >100,000 reads per sample. Raw amplicon sequence reads were evaluated for quality control (QC) using the FastQC suite with MultiQC [70,71] and were then processed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2 v2021.2) [72]. The Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm 2 (DADA2) package [73] was used within QIIME2 to denoise and dereplicate all paired-end sequences and to create the feature table of amplicon sequence variants used within QIIME2. DADA2 parameters were chosen to trim the first 30 bp and to truncate both paired-end reads at position 240. Taxonomic assignment was performed via QIIME2 and the data were aligned to Silva (v132) [74] using the QIIME taxonomy modules.

Transcriptome sequencing

RNAseq analyses were conducted at the Emory Primate Research Center NHP Genomics Core Laboratory (http://www.yerkes.emory.edu/nhp_genomics_core/). Two rectal biopsies from each participant were placed in RNALater (Invitrogen, #AM7021) and stored at -80°C until processing. Both biopsies were homogenized in 350 mL of Buffer RLT and then extracted using the RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen) with on-column DNase digestion. RNA quality was assessed using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent), and then ten nanograms of total RNA was used as input for cDNA synthesis using the Clontech SMART-Seq v4 Ultra Low Input RNA kit (Takara Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplified cDNA was fragmented and appended with dual-indexed bar codes using the NexteraXT DNA Library Preparation kit (Illumina). Libraries were validated by capillary electrophoresis on a TapeStation 4200 (Agilent), pooled at equimolar concentrations, and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq3000 at 100SR, yielding ~18 million reads per sample. Alignment was performed using STAR version 2.5.2b [75] using default parameters and transcripts were annotated using GRCh38. Transcript abundance estimates were calculated internal to the STAR aligner using the algorithm of htseq-count [76] in union mode.

Ex vivo explant challenge experiments

Three biopsies from each participant without HIV were individually weighed and exposed to HIV-1 BaL (102.8 TCID50 in a volume of 250 μl media) for 2 h (37°C, 5% CO2). Each biopsy was then extensively serial-washed in sterile PBS (5 x 500 μl) and placed on a pre-soaked, pre-warmed collagen raft (Ethicon Surgifoam, #1972) in 1 ml complete media (RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS, Gentamicin Sulfate, and Zosyn). At set post-infection timepoints (Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 18), 700 μl media was removed and replaced with 700 μl complete media. Collected supernatants were stored at -30°C until p24 analysis. P24 was quantified via ELISA (ABL, Inc. #5447) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. P24 values were normalized to biopsy weight.

HIV viral load on rectal biopsy specimens

Two rectal biopsies from each participant with HIV were weighed prior to being placed in Promega lysis buffer for overnight tissue digestion. HIV-1 RNA was quantitated using the Abbott Realtime HIV-1 Assay procedure. Results are reported as copies per milligram of tissue. Biopsies with results below the assay limit of detection were assigned values of 1.

GC/CT and syphilis detection

The Abbott Real Time CT/NG PCR was utilized to detect Neisseria gonorrhea and/or Chlamydia trachomatis from rectal swabs collected during rigid sigmoidoscopy. RPR with Reflex Titer and Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Confirmatory Testing was utilized to detect Treponema pallidum from blood samples at a commercial laboratory (Quest Diagnostics).

Statistical analyses

Demographic and sexual behavior characteristics were compared between study groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, as appropriate.

Immune cell subset statistical analyses

Given our modest sample size and multiple parameter outcomes of interest, we first used discovery-based linear decomposition modeling (LDM) that allowed for inclusion of all four study groups into a single model, controlled for multiple comparisons, and is a single analysis pathway that combines both global tests of effect as well as tests of individual outcomes [13,77]. LDM also enables the inclusion of interaction terms in the model to assess for effect modification. In this case, we were interested in interaction between HIV and STI, meaning that the effect of STI on immune cell subsets could differ based on the participant’s HIV status. To visualize global differences, two-dimensional principal coordinates analyses (PCoAs) were constructed. We then used LDM to produce individual p values for assessing differences of individual cell subsets between groups, and adjusted p values that account for multiple comparisons while controlling for FDR at nominal level 10%. The LDM essentially fits a linear model for the cellular subset data as the outcome and regresses it on continuous traits or categorical group variables while adjusting for potential confounders; however, it differs from standard linear regression in that it uses permutation-based p values to account for non-normally distributed cellular subset data. For these analyses, data for each cell subset were normalized to have mean zero and standard deviance of one; missing data were imputed by the mean of the observed data in the same cellular subset.

Microbiome statistical analyses

We began our analyses of microbiome composition by using the above-described discovery-based linear decomposition modeling (LDM) to look for interaction between HIV and STI for the assessed outcomes of alpha and beta diversity, relative abundance, and presence-absence data. LDM is not compositionally aware by design, but we elected to use it in order to avoid some inherent biases in compositionally aware methods, such as the biases associated with the introduction of pseudo counts and the incapability of handling rare taxa. Taxonomic alpha diversity, or the distribution of species abundances in a given sample, was estimated using the Chao1 and Shannon indices and measured with a Wilcoxon test. Beta diversity, or dissimilarity in community composition, was estimated using the Bray-Curtis and Jaccard indices and measured using PERMANOVA. This was calculated using an ASV table and with vegan software package. Relative abundance provides the percentage of the microbiome that is made up of a specific organism and was analyzed by LDM. Presence-absence analysis assesses the probability that a taxon is present within a given sample and is the preferred analysis for identifying rare taxa. Many associations are driven by changes in which taxa are present and which are absent, however confounding by read depth is a limitation to this analysis. Our method of evaluating presence-absence involves first rarifying the ASV table such that all samples have the same library size, which eliminates confounding by read depth, and then repeatedly applying the LDM to all rarified taxa count tables [77]. Beta diversity was visualized with Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA). We first generated a global p value with the LDM and then assessed associations with individual taxa. No interaction was found via any of these measures, and so stratified analyses were not indicated. All analyses were conducted at the genus level.

RNA-seq statistical analyses

We restricted our analyses to those samples run in a single sequencing plate in order to avoid the risk of sequencing batch effect. The single batch we selected included the majority of participants in our four study groups with representation from all groups included on the same plate. After RNA sequencing read alignment, gene-wise and isoform-wise expression levels for individual genes were estimated using the program DESeq2, which normalizes gene expression level estimates across samples and also corrects for non-uniformity in read distributions across each gene [78]. We again used the LDM to test for interaction and examine global as well as individual gene level differences between the groups. Differentially expressed genes were tested for enrichment in gene families/pathways/protein interactions using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis with the Immunological Signatures Databases hosted at the MSigDB database (www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/collection.jsp). GSEA was performed on the regularized log (rlog) expression table produced by DESeq2 employing a weighted enrichment statistic and Signal2Noise as the ranking metric and using 1000 phenotype permutations. Because there is no consensus on gene normalization or interaction correction for PCoA analysis, we did not construct PCoA plots for our transcriptome data.

Explant challenge and rectal mucosal HIV viral load statistical analyses

For participants without HIV, the median logAUC p24 values and the p24 concentrations, normalized by biopsy weight, from each day of assessment were compared between study groups by the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction. For participants with HIV, the median rectal viral loads were compared between study groups by the Mann Whitney t test.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Immune cell subsets characterized by flow cytometry on blood and rectal mucosal (RM) samples.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Summary of study methods.

Each study participant underwent rigid sigmoidoscopy for the collection of study specimens. Rectal mucosal swabs were collected for 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Six rectal mucosal pinch biopsies were collected for immune cell quantification via flow cytometry. Two rectal mucosal pinch biopsies were collected for RNAseq transcriptomic analysis. For YMSM with HIV, two rectal mucosal pinch biopsies were collected for HIV viral load detection. For YMSM without HIV, three rectal mucosal pinch biopsies were collected for our ex vivo HIV challenge. Figure created with BioRender.com.

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Rectal mucosal microbiome composition in YMSM with and without HIV.

(A) Bray-Curtis and (B) Jaccard measures of beta diversity both demonstrated no significant differences between the microbiome composition of YMSM with and without HIV. Pink dots represent HIV-positive YMSM; teal dots represent HIV-negative YMSM.

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Representative gating strategy for rectal mucosal mononuclear cells.

Lymphocytes were identified by forward and side scatter. CD45+ cells were then isolated, followed by CD3+ cells which were separated into CD4+ and CD8+ subsets. Memory CD4 cells were identified by excluding CD45RA+ cells. CD69 marker was then used to divide CD4+ cells into tissue resident and non-tissue resident populations. Memory CD8 + cells were designated as being CCR7- and CD45RA+/-. Among memory CD8+ T cells, both CD69 and CD103 markers were used to designate tissue resident populations. Memory CD4+ populations, including tissue resident and non-tissue resident subsets, were then assessed for expression of CCR5, α4β7, and Ki67.

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Representative gating strategy to detect cytokine-positive rectal mucosal CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

Rectal CD4+ and CD8+ MMCs were stimulated for 4 hours with PMA/Ionomycin and stained for indicated cytokines. Live cells were identified by live/dead staining and lymphocytes were identified by forward and side scatter. CD45+ cells were then isolated, followed by CD3+ cells which were separated into CD4+ and CD8+ subsets. Stimulated CD4+ T cells were assessed for IL-17A, IFNγ, and TNFα cytokine production and stimulated CD8+ T cells for IFNγ and TNFα. Abbreviations: MMC, mucosal mononuclear cells, PMA, phorbol myristate acetate, IFNγ, interferon gamma, TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha.

(TIFF)

S5 Fig. Representative gating strategy to detect neutrophils, NK, macrophage, and B cells.

Representative flow panel to identify non-T-cell immune cell subsets: Lymphocytes were identified via forward and side scatter, singlets, and live cells. Neutrophils were CD66+ CD45+ cells. CD45+CD3-CD20- cells were further divided by negative gating to CD56+ and CD56+CD16+ NK, macrophages by CD16, CD163, and HLA-DR expression, while CD1c+ and pDC were identified with CD11c, CD1c, and CD123. B-cells were defined by HLA-DR and CD20 expression.

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

We express our sincerest gratitude to the study participants. We also gratefully acknowledge the Hope Clinic clinical research and community engagement team.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health: R01AI128799 (CFK), R01HD092033 (CFK), P30AI050409, P51OD011132. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Sullivan PS, Peterson J, Rosenberg ES, Kelley CF, Cooper H, Vaughan A, et al. Understanding racial HIV/STI disparities in black and white men who have sex with men: a multilevel approach. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.HIV Surveillance Report 2019 [updated May 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html.
  • 3.Sexually Transitted Disease Surveillance 2020: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2020 [https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2020/default.htm.
  • 4.Shannon CL, Klausner JD. The growing epidemic of sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: a neglected population. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 2018;30(1):137–43. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Singer M, Bulled N, Ostrach B, Mendenhall E. Syndemics and the biosocial conception of health. Lancet. 2017;389(10072):941–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30003-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gandhi M, Spinelli MA, Mayer KH. Addressing the Sexually Transmitted Infection and HIV Syndemic. JAMA. 2019;321(14):1356–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baggaley RF, White RG, Boily MC. HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(4):1048–63. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hladik F, McElrath MJ. Setting the stage: host invasion by HIV. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2008;8(6):447–57. doi: 10.1038/nri2302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2021 [https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/default.htm.
  • 10.Garofalo R, Hotton AL, Kuhns LM, Gratzer B, Mustanski B. Incidence of HIV Infection and Sexually Transmitted Infections and Related Risk Factors Among Very Young Men Who Have Sex With Men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72(1):79–86. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Massanella M, Fromentin R, Chomont N. Residual inflammation and viral reservoirs: alliance against an HIV cure. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016;11(2):234–41. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sieg SF, Shive CL, Panigrahi S, Freeman ML. Probing the Interface of HIV and Inflammaging. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2021;18(3):198–210. doi: 10.1007/s11904-021-00547-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hu YJ, Satten GA. Testing hypotheses about the microbiome using the linear decomposition model (LDM). Bioinformatics. 2020;36(14):4106–15. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wullaert A, Verstrepen L, Van Huffel S, Adib-Conquy M, Cornelis S, Kreike M, et al. LIND/ABIN-3 is a novel lipopolysaccharide-inducible inhibitor of NF-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(1):81–90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607481200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boehm D, Jeng M, Camus G, Gramatica A, Schwarzer R, Johnson JR, et al. SMYD2-Mediated Histone Methylation Contributes to HIV-1 Latency. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21(5):569–79 e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mollenhauer J, Herbertz S, Holmskov U, Tolnay M, Krebs I, Merlo A, et al. DMBT1 encodes a protein involved in the immune defense and in epithelial differentiation and is highly unstable in cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60(6):1704–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.You R, Liu YP, Lin DC, Li Q, Yu T, Zou X, et al. Clonal Mutations Activate the NF-kappaB Pathway to Promote Recurrence of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2019;79(23):5930–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li C-W, Lim S-O, Chung EM, Kim Y-S, Park AH, Yao J, et al. Eradication of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells by Targeting Glycosylated PD-L1. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(2):187–201.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu T, Mu Y, Bogomolovas J, Fang X, Veevers J, Nowak RB, et al. HSPB7 is indispensable for heart development by modulating actin filament assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(45):11956–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713763114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu Z, Liu J, Liu R, Xue M, Zhang W, Zhao X, et al. Downregulated ZNF132 predicts unfavorable outcomes in breast cancer via hypermethylation modification. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08112-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schiller HB, Fernandez IE, Burgstaller G, Schaab C, Scheltema RA, Schwarzmayr T, et al. Time- and compartment-resolved proteome profiling of the extracellular niche in lung injury and repair. Mol Syst Biol. 2015;11(7):819. doi: 10.15252/msb.20156123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dong Y, Simske JS. Vertebrate Claudin/PMP22/EMP22/MP20 family protein TMEM47 regulates epithelial cell junction maturation and morphogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2016;245(6):653–66. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102(43):15545–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mehandru S, Poles MA, Tenner-Racz K, Jean-Pierre P, Manuelli V, Lopez P, et al. Lack of mucosal immune reconstitution during prolonged treatment of acute and early HIV-1 infection. PLoS Med. 2006;3(12):e484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Q, Duan L, Estes JD, Ma ZM, Rourke T, Wang Y, et al. Peak SIV replication in resting memory CD4+ T cells depletes gut lamina propria CD4+ T cells. Nature. 2005;434(7037):1148–52. doi: 10.1038/nature03513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brenchley JM, Douek DC. HIV infection and the gastrointestinal immune system. Mucosal Immunol. 2008;1(1):23–30. doi: 10.1038/mi.2007.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brenchley JM, Schacker TW, Ruff LE, Price DA, Taylor JH, Beilman GJ, et al. CD4+ T cell depletion during all stages of HIV disease occurs predominantly in the gastrointestinal tract. J Exp Med. 2004;200(6):749–59. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Juno JA, Wragg KM, Amarasena T, Meehan BS, Mak JYW, Liu L, et al. MAIT Cells Upregulate alpha4beta7 in Response to Acute Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/Simian HIV Infection but Are Resistant to Peripheral Depletion in Pigtail Macaques. J Immunol. 2019;202(7):2105–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Poles MA, Barsoum S, Yu W, Yu J, Sun P, Daly J, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 induces persistent changes in mucosal and blood gammadelta T cells despite suppressive therapy. J Virol. 2003;77(19):10456–67. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.19.10456-10467.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mela CM, Steel A, Lindsay J, Gazzard BG, Gotch FM, Goodier MR. Depletion of natural killer cells in the colonic lamina propria of viraemic HIV-1-infected individuals. AIDS. 2007;21(16):2177–82. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f08b72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Titanji B, Gavegnano C, Hsue P, Schinazi R, Marconi VC. Targeting Inflammation to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in People With HIV Infection. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(3):e014873. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zeggagh J, Bauer R, Delaugerre C, Carette D, Fressard L, Charreau I, et al. Incidence and risk factors for recurrent sexually transmitted infections among MSM on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. AIDS. 2022;36(8):1129–34. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hiransuthikul A, Pattanachaiwit S, Teeratakulpisarn N, Chamnan P, Pathipvanich P, Thongpaen S, et al. High subsequent and recurrent sexually transmitted infection prevalence among newly diagnosed HIV-positive Thai men who have sex with men and transgender women in the Test and Treat cohort. Int J STD AIDS. 2019;30(2):140–6. doi: 10.1177/0956462418799213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rönn M, Hughes G, White P, Simms I, Ison C, Ward H. Characteristics of LGV repeaters: analysis of LGV surveillance data. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(4):275–8. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hoenigl M, Moser CB, Funderburg N, Bosch R, Kantor A, Zhang Y, et al. Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor Is Predictive of Non-AIDS Events During Antiretroviral Therapy-mediated Viral Suppression. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(4):676–86. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bello FO, Akanmu AS, Adeyemo TA, Idowu BM, Okonkwo P, Kanki PJ. Derangement of protein S and C4b-binding protein levels as acquired thrombophilia in HIV-infected adult Nigerians. South Afr J HIV Med. 2021;22(1):1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Garden GA, Budd SL, Tsai E, Hanson L, Kaul M, D’Emilia DM, et al. Caspase cascades in human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurodegeneration. J Neurosci. 2002;22(10):4015–24. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-10-04015.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chun TW, Nickle DC, Justement JS, Meyers JH, Roby G, Hallahan CW, et al. Persistence of HIV in gut-associated lymphoid tissue despite long-term antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(5):714–20. doi: 10.1086/527324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martín-Vicente M, Medrano LM, Resino S, García-Sastre A, Martínez I. TRIM25 in the Regulation of the Antiviral Innate Immunity. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1187. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shen Z, Wei L, Yu Z-b, Yao Z-y, Cheng J, Wang Y-t, et al. The Roles of TRIMs in Antiviral Innate Immune Signaling. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2021;11. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.628275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhao C, Jia M, Song H, Yu Z, Wang W, Li Q, et al. The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase TRIM40 Attenuates Antiviral Immune Responses by Targeting MDA5 and RIG-I. Cell Reports. 2017;21(6):1613–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang X, Gabuzda D. Regulation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity by the ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. J Virol. 1999;73(4):3460–6. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.4.3460-3466.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chyuan IT, Hsu P-N. TRAIL regulates T cell activation and suppresses inflammation in autoimmune diseases. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 2020;17(12):1281–3. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0410-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cummins N, Badley A. The TRAIL to viral pathogenesis: the good, the bad and the ugly. Curr Mol Med. 2009;9(4):495–505. doi: 10.2174/156652409788167078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Clements JD, Pate MS, Hedges SR, Sibley DA, Russell MW, Hook EW, et al. Urethral Cytokine and Immune Responses in Chlamydia trachomatis-Infected Males. Infection and Immunity. 2001;69(11):7178–81. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.11.7178-7181.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vats V, Agrawal T, Salhan S, Mittal A. Primary and secondary immune responses of mucosal and peripheral lymphocytes during Chlamydia trachomatis infection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;49(2):280–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00196.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ramsey KH, Schneider H, Cross AS, Boslego JW, Hoover DL, Staley TL, et al. Inflammatory Cytokines Produced in Response to Experimental Human Gonorrhea. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1995;172(1):186–91. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.1.186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Heiligenberg M, Lutter R, Pajkrt D, Adams K, Vries HD, Heijman T, et al. Effect of HIV and Chlamydia Infection on Rectal Inflammation and Cytokine Concentrations in Men Who Have Sex with Men. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2013;20(10):1517–23. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00763-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Theis KR, Florova V, Romero R, Borisov AB, Winters AD, Galaz J, et al. Sneathia: an emerging pathogen in female reproductive disease and adverse perinatal outcomes. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2021;47(4):517–42. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2021.1905606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Senn L, Clerc O, Zanetti G, Basset P, Prod’hom G, Gordon NC, et al. The Stealthy Superbug: the Role of Asymptomatic Enteric Carriage in Maintaining a Long-Term Hospital Outbreak of ST228 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. mBio. 2016;7(1):e02039–15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02039-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Al Bander Z, Nitert MD, Mousa A, Naderpoor N. The Gut Microbiota and Inflammation: An Overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20). doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yiu JH, Dorweiler B, Woo CW. Interaction between gut microbiota and toll-like receptor: from immunity to metabolism. J Mol Med (Berl). 2017;95(1):13–20. doi: 10.1007/s00109-016-1474-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Semin I, Ninnemann J, Bondareva M, Gimaev I, Kruglov AA. Interplay Between Microbiota, Toll-Like Receptors and Cytokines for the Maintenance of Epithelial Barrier Integrity. Frontiers in Medicine. 2021;8. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.644333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ceccarani C, Marangoni A, Severgnini M, Camboni T, Laghi L, Gaspari V, et al. Rectal Microbiota Associated With Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections in Men Having Sex With Other Men. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2019;9. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kelley CF, Kraft CS, de Man TJ, Duphare C, Lee HW, Yang J, et al. The rectal mucosa and condomless receptive anal intercourse in HIV-negative MSM: implications for HIV transmission and prevention. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10(4):996–1007. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fulcher JA, Li F, Tobin NH, Zabih S, Elliott J, Clark JL, et al. Gut dysbiosis and inflammatory blood markers precede HIV with limited changes after early seroconversion. EBioMedicine. 2022;84:104286. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Vesterbacka J, Rivera J, Noyan K, Parera M, Neogi U, Calle M, et al. Richer gut microbiota with distinct metabolic profile in HIV infected Elite Controllers. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):6269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06675-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Vujkovic-Cvijin I, Sortino O, Verheij E, Sklar J, Wit FW, Kootstra NA, et al. HIV-associated gut dysbiosis is independent of sexual practice and correlates with noncommunicable diseases. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):2448. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16222-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lee SC, Chua LL, Yap SH, Khang TF, Leng CY, Raja Azwa RI, et al. Enrichment of gut-derived Fusobacterium is associated with suboptimal immune recovery in HIV-infected individuals. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):14277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32585-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ackerley CG, Smith SA, Murray PM, Amancha PK, Arthur RA, Zhu Z, et al. The rectal mucosal immune environment and HIV susceptibility among young men who have sex with men. Front Immunol. 2022;13:972170. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.972170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Noguera-Julian M, Rocafort M, Guillen Y, Rivera J, Casadella M, Nowak P, et al. Gut Microbiota Linked to Sexual Preference and HIV Infection. EBioMedicine. 2016;5:135–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sui Y, Dzutsev A, Venzon D, Frey B, Thovarai V, Trinchieri G, et al. Influence of gut microbiome on mucosal immune activation and SHIV viral transmission in naive macaques. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11(4):1219–29. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0029-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ortiz AM, Baker PJ, Langner CA, Simpson J, Stacy A, Flynn JK, et al. Experimental bacterial dysbiosis with consequent immune alterations increase intrarectal SIV acquisition susceptibility. Cell Rep. 2023;42(1):112020. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bochart RM, Busman-Sahay K, Bondoc S, Morrow DW, Ortiz AM, Fennessey CM, et al. Mitigation of endemic GI-tract pathogen-mediated inflammation through development of multimodal treatment regimen and its impact on SIV acquisition in rhesus macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(5):e1009565. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kelley CF, Vaughan AS, Luisi N, Sanchez TH, Salazar LF, Frew PM, et al. The Effect of High Rates of Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections on HIV Incidence in a Cohort of Black and White Men Who Have Sex with Men in Atlanta, Georgia. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015;31(6):587–92. doi: 10.1089/AID.2015.0013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Barbee LA, Khosropour CM, Dombrowksi JC, Golden MR. New Human Immunodeficiency Virus Diagnosis Independently Associated With Rectal Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in Men Who Have Sex With Men. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44(7):385–9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Smith SA, Murray PM, Amancha PK, Ackerley CG, Tharp GK, Bosinger SE, et al. T-cell activation and B-cell interaction signatures in rectal tissues are associated with HIV replication in ex-vivo model of infection. AIDS. 2022;36(15):2101–6. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mylvaganam GH, Velu V, Hong JJ, Sadagopal S, Kwa S, Basu R, et al. Diminished viral control during simian immunodeficiency virus infection is associated with aberrant PD-1hi CD4 T cell enrichment in the lymphoid follicles of the rectal mucosa. J Immunol. 2014;193(9):4527–36. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yang I, Arthur RA, Zhao L, Clark J, Hu Y, Corwin EJ, et al. The oral microbiome and inflammation in mild cognitive impairment. Exp Gerontol. 2021;147:111273. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Andrews S. Fast QC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data 2010 [http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 71.Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):852–7. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hu YJ, Lane A, Satten GA. A rarefaction-based extension of the LDM for testing presence-absence associations in the microbiome. Bioinformatics. 2021. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Susan R Ross, Daniel C Douek

20 Mar 2023

Dear Dr Van Doren,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "HIV, asymptomatic STI, and the rectal mucosal immune environment among young men who have sex with men" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Daniel C. Douek

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Susan Ross

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: Comments to authors:

Here the authors have explored how HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases, and the composition of the GI tract bacterial microbiome contribute to inflammation in young men who have sex with men. The work is extremely important, considering that risk factors for HIV acquisition are known to influence the composition of the microbiome, and accumulating data suggest that these can increase susceptibility to acquisition. The authors use next generation sequencing and flow cytometry to assess the transcriptomics and immune cell phenotypes of the host and the composition of the bacterial microbiome. The authors find that asymptomatic HIV does not influence the composition of the microbiome, but other STIs are associated with dramatic bacterial dysbiosis. Consistent with many previous reports, the authors find that asymptomatic HIV infection is associated with dramatic immunological perturbations, but the authors also find that other asymptomatic STIs are also associated with inflammation. The authors argue their findings have important implications for how to clinically manage individuals with risk factors for HIV acquisition. Overall, the experiments are well performed, appropriate controls are included, and the conclusions are supported by the data presented.

Reviewer #2: In this study, researchers studied YMSM with and without HIV and asymptomatic bacteria STI (gonnorrhea, chlamydia, and syphillus, etc) to understand potential interactions of these infections on the rectal mucosal immune environment. They assayed 7 innate and 19 adaptive immune populations in the rectum with flow cytometry, RNASeq and also evaluated the mucosal microbiome with 16S rRNA sequencing. They describe strong alterations in immune cell populations in rectum of YMSM with HIV, which is a strong contribution to the field since they had pretty in depth immune data. They do not detect microbiome differences with HIV, which is not entirely surprising since HIV-associated microbiome differences have been detected but subtle in prior studies that controlled for MSM. Perhaps the most interesting finding is in their RNASeq data, where they describe an interaction in which bacterial STI was associated with upregulation of inflammatory genes and enrichment of immune response pathways in YMSM with HIV but not without HIV. This result was quite robust, and this has implications for treating concurrent STIs in YMSM, and understanding potential drivers of chronic inflammation observed in PLWH. Overall the paper is well written. With 105 study participants, the cohort size is decent but a little unbalanced so some cohorts are still quite small(e.g. only 14 with HIV and STI and 48 without either). It also has the weakness that they did not have the power to stratify by STI, and instead binned people with Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Syphilus into a single “with bacterial STI” group but these are very different pathogens that might influence very different immune subsets/ levels of inflammation. These caveats are appropriately discussed in the Discussion. The paper in places could use better description of the methods employed and other minor revisions as detailed below, but overall it is a strong paper.

Reviewer #3: The authors present a study examining relationships between HIV and STI’s with respect to mucosal microbiomes, immune cell proportions, gene expression, and ex vivo HIV infection susceptibility. The study is well-designed and provides unique insights into the interactions between HIV and STIs in several highly relevant biological systems. Inflammation in HIV is associated with all-cause mortality and numerous comorbidities, though the etiology of this ongoing inflammation remains poorly understood. The authors present data suggesting the combination of STIs and HIV may uniquely contribute to this ongoing inflammation in a way that does not occur in people without HIV.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: none

Reviewer #3: 1.What was the median and range of time since HIV diagnosis for these individuals? And time on ART? While confounding effects from MSM status have caused inconsistent results across studies, several studies have been performed that matched HIVpos and HIVneg for MSM status. Some of these studies show no significant differences in the gut microbiome of HIVpos individuals when looking early in infection (10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104286), but studies of MSM-matched chronically-infected adults show significant differences compared to HIVneg (DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-32585-x, 10.1038/s41467-020-16222-8, DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-06675-1). It will be helpful for readers to know if these HIVpos are early in their infection and whether that may be why no differences in the microbiome are seen.

2.An aspect of the analytical design makes it difficult to confirm the authors’ conclusion that HIV has a greater impact on immune cell subsets than STIs. When HIVpos are compared to HIVneg, the difference between them is one infectious agent that causes its own unique skewing of immune subset proportions. When comparing STIpos to STIneg, several infections are grouped which may have different effects on immune cell subsets, making groupwise comparisons problematic. Groupwise comparisons test whether a group as a whole differs in a common, concerted way from another group. If there are multiple sub-groups that are inherently different from each other, this contributes noise that would hamper a statistical test’s assessment of significant differences. This would also interfere with systems-level analyses like in 2A. If three sub-groups were present within the STIpos that each had their own unique signature of immune cell subsets, they may be equally different from the STIneg and from each other, in which case there would be no statistically significant difference between STIpos and STIneg. Indeed, the STIpos group appears to have more intra-group variance in Figure 2A, which one might expect if there are unique influences on immune cells from the different STI types (Neisseria, Chlamydia, etc.). One recommended way to test for this is ANOSIM. Further exploration of the effects of different STI’s within STIpos is merited. Do any of the sub-groups cluster away from the STIneg? Do they exhibit differences with regards to skewing of immune cell subsets?

3.The authors find that Chlamydia and Neisseria were enriched in the STIpos group consistent with the inclusion criteria for this group. The authors also find five other groups enriched in STIpos (Sneathia, Staphylococcus, Corynebacteriaceae, Bulleidia, and Hemophilus). Calling these taxa “pathogenic” is potentially problematic in that they are commensals that are present in healthy human skin (Staphylococcus, Corynebacteriaceae, and Hemophilus), vagina (Sneathia), and gut (Bulleidia). For example, Staphylococcus genus taxa are present in the skin of nearly every human sampled in large studies (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4185404/), and though Staphylococcus aureus is a well-known cause of harmful infection, most nares are colonized with it without overt infection or inflammation. “Ectopic” colonization of the gut with taxa from other body surfaces is associated with inflammation and these taxa can themselves stimulate inflammation (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29051379/), so I believe the authors’ observations are of interest and are important, but calling them “pathogenic” may be an over-simplification. The authors may consider using the term of Atarashi et al. of ‘ectopic’ and noting these taxa typically colonize other body surfaces, or otherwise softening the idea that these are overt pathogens.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1.The authors should include discussion of recent work in NHPs which suggest that the composition of the microbiome can influence SIV acquisition via low dose intrarectal challenge.

2.The authors should also discuss previous work (32415070) suggesting that the best predictor of HIV associated dysbiosis is nadir CD4 count, arguing that dysbiosis is not common in HIV until very late in the disease. The authors should also discuss previous work demonstrating that the microbiome of MSM is different than that of MSW (27077120)

3.The OTU bar graph in Figure 3 should be arranged by phyla.

4.The use of antibiotics to treat the STIs is mentioned in the manuscript, but their use will obviously influence the composition of the microbiome. This needs to be further fleshed out in the figures and in the table describing the cohort. Which antibiotics, for how long, can the authors break up Abx treated individuals vs untreated in the figures? Do the authors have any longitudinal data (particularly on the microbiome) pre/post Abx use?

5.The authors should provide representative flow cytometry gating strategies in the supplemental figures.

Reviewer #2: 1)Bacterial pathogens that spread by fecal:oral transmission like Campylobacter and Shigella have received attention for spreading sexually among MSM. Were these seen in this cohort?

2)Some minor typos grammatical:

a.Page 6 first line of results: “enrolled intro”

b.Page 10 last line: 16s should be 16S (same Page 11 second line and Fig 3 legend)

3)Table 1: not all abbreviations defined in legend (e.g. GC, CT, TP)

4)Would be nice to have more info on how “rectal biopsy and secretion sampling” was performed in main text– by “secretion sampling” are you referring to the rectal swabs for microbiome?

5)Please provide IRB approval number

6)Would be nice to have the gating strategies better described in this paper (supplemental materials if needed for space reasons) rather than just referencing previous publications. Same for the extraction and sequencing methods used to assess the microbiome.

7)Page 9 line 2” confused by the statement “two-dimensional principal components analysis (PCAs) were constructed and analyzed by PERMANOVA” – I may be unfamiliar with this particular application but PERMANOVA is typically run on a distance matrix, not on the results of a PCA analysis. I have seen it coupled with principal coordinates analysis visualizations (PCoA) – because the PCoA might have been drawn using the same distance matrix. If this was done please indicate the distance metric used. If not, please explain in a little more detail here or in the methods how a “two-dimensional PCA” was performed and input into PERMANOVA. Also might want to consider using ADONIS because could evaluate HIV and STI in a single model.

8)Page 10 – for p-values reported – should give more detail on the statistical tests employed. E.g. for alpha diversity measures (Chao 1 etc) – was this a T-test? For beta diversity (Bray-Curtis) was this PERMANOVA? For differential abundance – should consider using a compositionally aware analysis method like ANCOM-BC.

9)Page 10: More details should be given somewhere on how microbiome beta diversity was calculated. Was this done on the ASV table or a taxa summary table and with what software package? Would suggest applying phylogenetically aware metric like unweighted/weighted UniFrac as could add more resolution potentially.

10)Figure 3 B,C – and associated manuscript text on page 11 – should indicate statistical test used (PERMANOVA) should consider using UniFrac.

11)Bottom page 11 – were these analyses done on genus level taxa and if so defined with which classifier? Methods list 2 different classifiers (Silva and greengenes) and things listed are something at genus and sometimes at family level.

12)How were the 43 individuals selected for RNASeq analyses stratified across the 4 cohorts? (page 12)

13)Page 12 – it is stated that all of the significant genes that differed between YMSM with and without HIV contribute to immune function and tissue homeostasis. How was this determined and in what way?

14)Last line of page 14 – I thought most prior studies show decrease of MAITs with HIV but you show increase, but says consistent with prior studies

Reviewer #3: Abbreviations for the STIs will be helpful for readers if defined in the Table legend (Table 1) as they are in the text.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Catherine Lozupone

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Decision Letter 1

Susan R Ross, Daniel C Douek

10 May 2023

Dear Dr Van Doren,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'HIV, asymptomatic STI, and the rectal mucosal immune environment among young men who have sex with men' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Daniel C. Douek

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Susan Ross

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed the concerns raised by all reviewers.

Reviewer #2: My concerns/comments were nicely addressed. I only have one very minor point below.

Reviewer #3: The authors have addressed my comments in their revision, and I believe the study is a valuable contribution to our evolving understanding of what may stimulate ongoing inflammation in HIV. One final comment: It may be useful to show abundances of the potentially pathogenic taxa broken apart into the four different groups (HIV-STI-, HIV+STI-, HIV-STI+, HIV+STI+). I understand power is limited, but it may be interesting for the field to understand hints of whether STI-mediated perturbations in microbiome composition may be more exaggerated in HIV+ individuals.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: None

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: With regard to my comment 11, I still think it is a little unclear in the revised whether done at genus or family level. It appears that all analyses was done at genus level but some were only assigned to family level so in those cases it is stated e.g. that the family differed. However, it is an important distinction that these only represent the bacteria in that family that were not classified at the genus level. bacteria in that family that were classified at the genus level are subtracted out. I usually would indicate this by specifying that all analyses were conducted at genus level and those are e.g. "unclassified Lachnospiraceae"

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Catherine Lozupone

Reviewer #3: No

Acceptance letter

Susan R Ross, Daniel C Douek

24 May 2023

Dear Dr Van Doren,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "HIV, asymptomatic STI, and the rectal mucosal immune environment among young men who have sex with men," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Immune cell subsets characterized by flow cytometry on blood and rectal mucosal (RM) samples.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Summary of study methods.

    Each study participant underwent rigid sigmoidoscopy for the collection of study specimens. Rectal mucosal swabs were collected for 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Six rectal mucosal pinch biopsies were collected for immune cell quantification via flow cytometry. Two rectal mucosal pinch biopsies were collected for RNAseq transcriptomic analysis. For YMSM with HIV, two rectal mucosal pinch biopsies were collected for HIV viral load detection. For YMSM without HIV, three rectal mucosal pinch biopsies were collected for our ex vivo HIV challenge. Figure created with BioRender.com.

    (TIFF)

    S2 Fig. Rectal mucosal microbiome composition in YMSM with and without HIV.

    (A) Bray-Curtis and (B) Jaccard measures of beta diversity both demonstrated no significant differences between the microbiome composition of YMSM with and without HIV. Pink dots represent HIV-positive YMSM; teal dots represent HIV-negative YMSM.

    (TIFF)

    S3 Fig. Representative gating strategy for rectal mucosal mononuclear cells.

    Lymphocytes were identified by forward and side scatter. CD45+ cells were then isolated, followed by CD3+ cells which were separated into CD4+ and CD8+ subsets. Memory CD4 cells were identified by excluding CD45RA+ cells. CD69 marker was then used to divide CD4+ cells into tissue resident and non-tissue resident populations. Memory CD8 + cells were designated as being CCR7- and CD45RA+/-. Among memory CD8+ T cells, both CD69 and CD103 markers were used to designate tissue resident populations. Memory CD4+ populations, including tissue resident and non-tissue resident subsets, were then assessed for expression of CCR5, α4β7, and Ki67.

    (TIFF)

    S4 Fig. Representative gating strategy to detect cytokine-positive rectal mucosal CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

    Rectal CD4+ and CD8+ MMCs were stimulated for 4 hours with PMA/Ionomycin and stained for indicated cytokines. Live cells were identified by live/dead staining and lymphocytes were identified by forward and side scatter. CD45+ cells were then isolated, followed by CD3+ cells which were separated into CD4+ and CD8+ subsets. Stimulated CD4+ T cells were assessed for IL-17A, IFNγ, and TNFα cytokine production and stimulated CD8+ T cells for IFNγ and TNFα. Abbreviations: MMC, mucosal mononuclear cells, PMA, phorbol myristate acetate, IFNγ, interferon gamma, TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha.

    (TIFF)

    S5 Fig. Representative gating strategy to detect neutrophils, NK, macrophage, and B cells.

    Representative flow panel to identify non-T-cell immune cell subsets: Lymphocytes were identified via forward and side scatter, singlets, and live cells. Neutrophils were CD66+ CD45+ cells. CD45+CD3-CD20- cells were further divided by negative gating to CD56+ and CD56+CD16+ NK, macrophages by CD16, CD163, and HLA-DR expression, while CD1c+ and pDC were identified with CD11c, CD1c, and CD123. B-cells were defined by HLA-DR and CD20 expression.

    (TIFF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS Pathogens Cover Letter.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES