Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 9;18(6):e0287043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287043

Table 4. Multidrug resistance profiles of Enterobacteriaceae isolates from chicken droppings in poultry farms at Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia, March to June 2022.

Resistance pattern No. of antibiotics (classes) Type of isolate N
E. coli N = 87 K. pneumoniae N = 11 P. mirabilis N = 18 E. cloacae N = 4 Salmonella spp. N = 23 Total N = 143
Susceptible for all drug -- 4 - - - 3 7
TET 1 (1) 3 - - - 2 5
AMP 1 (1) 4 1 - - - 5
AMP TET 2 (2) 3 1 4 1 - 9
AMP SXT 2 (2) - - - - 1 1
AMP, TET, SXT 3 (3) 12 2 1 - 5 20
AMP, TET, NAL 3 (3) 11 - 1 - 3 15
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL 4 (4) 12 - - - 1 13
AMP, TET, SXT, CHL 4 (4) 2 - - - - 2
AMP, TET, NAL, CIP 4 (3) 5 - - - 1 6
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CIP 5 (4) - - 3 - 1 4
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CHL 5 (5) 8 1 1 - 1 11
AMP, TET, NAL, CIP, CXT 5 (4) 2 - - - - 2
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CIP, CHL 6 (5) 2 - - - - 2
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CHL, CXT 6 (6) 3 2 - - - 5
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CIP, CHL, CXT 7 (6) 1 - 4 - - 5
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CAZ CTX, CRO 7 (5) 4 1 - - 3 8
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CIP CXT, CAZ, CTX 8 (5) 2 1 1 2 1 7
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CIP, CHL, CAZ CTX, CRO, GEN, MER 9 (6) 6 2 3 - - 11
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CHL, CXT, CAZ CTX, CRO, GEN 9 (6) 1 - - 1 1 3
AMP, TET, SXT, NAL, CIP, CHL, CXT, CAZ CTX, CRO, GEN, MER 10 (6) 2 - - - - 2
Total non-MDR isolates N (%) -- 14 (16.1%) 2 (18.2%) 4 (22.2%) 1 (25.0%) 6 (26.1%) 27 (18.9%)
Total MDR isolates N (%) -- 73 (83.9%) 9 (81.8%) 14 (77.8%) 3 (75.0%) 17 (73.9%) 116 (81.1%)

Key: AMP = ampicillin; TET = tetracycline; SXT = trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; NAL = nalidixic acid; CHL = chloramphenicol; CIP = ciprofloxacin; CAZ = ceftazidime; CTX = cefotaxime, CRO = ceftriaxone; CXT = cefoxitin; GEN = gentamicin; MER = meropenem; MDR = multidrug-resistant (against ≥3 antimicrobial classes)