Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 9;102(23):e33915. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033915

Table 1.

Characteristics of the cross-sectional studies included in this systematic review.

Num Author/Study With treatment (surgical), n (%) Follow-up (mo) Without treatment (control), n (%) Follow-up (mo) Gastric cancer stages, n (%)
Survival Death Survival Death
1 Oñate-Ocaña, et al (2007). Treatment of the adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction at a single institution in Mexico 29 (42.65) 39 (57.35) 16 10 (6.02) 156 (93.98) 6 I: 23 (9.8), II: 84 (35.9); III: 109 (46.6); UND: 18 (7.7)
2 Green, et al (2002). Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with survival 38 (33.33) 76 (66.67) 12 10 (27.77) 26 (72.23) 6 I: 8 (5.3), II: 9 (6), III: 33 (22.0); IV: 96 (64.0); UND: 4 (2.4)
3 Ramos de la Medina, et al (2004). Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in a young patient population 31 (42.46) 42 (57.54) 10 6 (60.0) 4 (40.0) 6 I–II: 8 (9.6), III: 22 (26.5); IV: 53 (63.9)
4 Medina-Franco, et al (2007). Prognostic factors in primary gastric lymphoma 16 (80.00) 4 (20.00) 65 11 (52.38) 10 (47.62) 18 I: 11 (26.8); II: 8 (19.5); III: 7 (17.1); IV: 15 (36.6)
5 Oñate-Ocaña, et al (2008). Selection of best candidates for multiorgan resection among patients with T4 gastric carcinoma 27 (15.97) 142 (84.03) 25 52 (9.47) 497 (90.53) 8 III: 86 (12.0); IV: 632 (88.0)

UND = undefined stage.