Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2023 May 5;172:107535. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107535

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of states with and without opioid prescribing cap laws, prior law implementation

States with an prescribing cap law (N=24a) States without a prescribing cap law (N=25b)
State patient demographics

 Proportion female 64.7 65.1
 Mean age 53.6 54.3
 Proportion with any mental illness 7.3 7.4
 Proportion with any substance use disorder 2.4 1.9
 Proportion with private insurance 62.5 63.1
 Proportion with Medicare 19.8 22.3
 Proportion with Medicaid 13.6 10.0
 Proportion with cash payment 0.7 1.1

Opioid analgesic prescriptions

 Proportion of patient panel with at least one opioid rx 11.2 13.3
 Proportion of patient panel with receipt of opioid rx with ≥ 7 days’ supply 57.1 55.4
 Proportion of patient panel with receipt of opioid rx with MME ≥ 50 per day 26.1 26.7
 Days’ supply of opioid prescriptions, per patient panel prescribed opioids 13.1 12.6
 Mean Morphine Equivalent (MME) per day per patient panel prescribed opioids 42.5 42.1

Bold indicates P<0.05. Statistical significance was assessed using t-tests comparing states with versus without opioid prescribing cap laws.

a

CT, NY, ME, NH, PA, VA, RI, DE, UT, NJ, MD, KY (implementation in 2017); HI, IN, AK, VT, LA, OH, NC, NV, AZ, SC, CO, WV (2018);

b

DC, MN, WY, TX, MT, AL, CA, GA, IA, ID, KS, ND, NE, NM, OR, SD, WI, FL, MI, TN, AR, MO, MS, OK, WA were in the comparison state pool and did not have a cap law during the study period. Of these twelve states ( FL, MI, TN, AR, MO, MS, OK, WA, MN, MT, TX, WY) had implementation dates ≥ July 2018. Two states (IL, MA) were excluded from analyses because implementation dates were prior to 2017.