Table 3.
A few of recommended imputation methods in specific scenarios.
| Value distribution | Missing mechanism | Correlation structure | Recommended methods | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mode | LogReg | MI | DT | RF | KNN | SVM | ANN | |||
| Negative event < positive event (e.g. 3:7) | MAR | < 0.5 | *** | * | – | *** | * | – | * | *** |
| > 0.5 | – | * | – | *** | * | – | *** | *** | ||
| MNAR | < 0.5 | *** | – | – | *** | – | – | *** | * | |
| > 0.5 | *** | – | – | * | – | – | *** | *** | ||
| MCAR | < 0.5 | * | – | – | * | – | – | *** | *** | |
| > 0.5 | * | * | – | * | * | – | *** | *** | ||
| Negative event ≈positive event (e.g. 5:5) | MAR | < 0.5 | – | *** | – | * | *** | – | * | *** |
| > 0.5 | – | *** | – | * | *** | – | * | *** | ||
| MNAR | < 0.5 | – | * | – | – | * | – | – | * | |
| > 0.5 | – | *** | – | * | *** | – | * | *** | ||
| MCAR | < 0.5 | – | *** | – | * | *** | – | *** | *** | |
| > 0.5 | – | *** | – | * | *** | – | * | *** | ||
| Negative event > positive event (e.g. 7:3) | MAR | < 0.5 | *** | – | – | * | – | * | *** | *** |
| > 0.5 | – | – | – | *** | * | * | *** | *** | ||
| MNAR | < 0.5 | – | * | – | * | * | * | – | * | |
| > 0.5 | – | * | – | * | * | – | * | * | ||
| MCAR | < 0.5 | * | – | – | *** | – | * | *** | *** | |
| > 0.5 | – | * | – | *** | * | * | *** | *** | ||
***Recommended methods.
*Acceptable methods.
– Not recommended methods.