Table 2.
Comparison of the performance process VS other processes in HA degradation.
| No. | Catalyst | Catalyst dose (g/L) | Initial Concentration (mg/L) | Time (min) | Removal Efficiency (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NiCo2O4 | 0.2 | 10 | 120 | 90 | [71] |
| 2 | PAC/LaFeO3/Cu | 0.72 | 5.33 | 36.2 | 95.5 | [72] |
| 3 | PE-TiO2 | 6.0 | 10 | 270 | 64.5 | [73] |
| 4 | CeO2/AC | 0.5 | 50 | 30 | 75 | [74] |
| 5 | TiO2/Fe2O3 | 0.4 | 20 | 180 | 61.6 | [75] |
| 6 | CuO–Co3O4@AC | 0.5 | 100 | 60 | 88 | [76] |
| 7 | Ag/ZnO | 0.6 | 50 | 40 | 70 | [77] |
| 8 | Ag3PO4/TiO2 | 0.2 | 5 | 20 | 88.2 | This study |