Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 22;9(5):e15678. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15678

Table 2.

Comparison of the performance process VS other processes in HA degradation.

No. Catalyst Catalyst dose (g/L) Initial Concentration (mg/L) Time (min) Removal Efficiency (%) Ref.
1 NiCo2O4 0.2 10 120 90 [71]
2 PAC/LaFeO3/Cu 0.72 5.33 36.2 95.5 [72]
3 PE-TiO2 6.0 10 270 64.5 [73]
4 CeO2/AC 0.5 50 30 75 [74]
5 TiO2/Fe2O3 0.4 20 180 61.6 [75]
6 CuO–Co3O4@AC 0.5 100 60 88 [76]
7 Ag/ZnO 0.6 50 40 70 [77]
8 Ag3PO4/TiO2 0.2 5 20 88.2 This study