Skip to main content
. 2023 May 23;110(6):927–939. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.001

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect size heterogeneity in the context of polygenicity

(A) Boxplot of type I error for Tractor and a standard GWAS split by non-differentiated (MAF difference 0.2) and differentiated (MAF difference > 0.2) SNPs.

(B) Boxplot of power for Tractor and a standard GWAS in the case of no effect size heterogeneity split by non-differentiated and differentiated SNPs.

(C) Boxplot of power for Tractor and a standard GWAS in the case of effect size heterogeneity split by non-differentiated and differentiated SNPs.

(D) Boxplot of power for Tractor and a standard GWAS in the case of opposite effect sizes split by non-differentiated and differentiated SNPs.

All simulations used real UKBB admixed genotypes and simulated phenotypes with 100 causal SNPs and a total additive genetic heritability of h2 = 0.5 (see subjects and methods). “” indicates a nominally significant p value (<0.05). “∗∗” indicates a Bonferroni-corrected significant p value (<1.28 × 10−3). The boxes show the inter-quartile range while the whiskers show the rest of the distribution (not including outliers).