Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Feb 26;54(1):231–250. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12233

TABLE 3.

Testing the validity of conventional unmet need against self-reported lack of access to a broad contraceptive method mix (Outcome 3), in a sample of 2,417 contraceptive nonusers in Burkina Faso, 2018

Lack access to a broad, affordable contraceptive method mix*
Yes
n (row %) 		No
n (row %) 		Total
n
Unmet need Yes 332 (39.1%) 518 (60.9%) 850
No 703 (44.9%) 864 (55.1%) 1,567
Total 1,035 (42.8%) 1,382 (57.2%) 2,417
Sensitivity 32.1%
Specificity 62.5%
Positive predictive value 39.1%
Negative predictive value 55.1%
*

Could not access or afford a method from each of the following groups: long-acting, short-acting, hormonal, non-hormonal, coitally dependent, coitally independent, provider dependent, provider independent, male controlled, female controlled, immediate return to fertility, and tier 1 (as per Family Planning, Global Handbook for providers, 2011).