. 2023 Jun 7;11:e15459. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15459

Table 2. Sequences quality and reads mapping of different samples.

Samples	Clean reads	Q30%	GC%	Mapped reads	Unique mapped reads
LPS1	38,126,744	94.29%	50.65%	36,008,258 (94.44%)	34,901,177 (91.54%)
LPS2	35,203,444	93.77%	50.41%	33,152,407 (94.17%)	31,547,155 (89.61%)
LPS3	34,923,253	94.05%	49.92%	32,860,710 (94.09%)	31,834,282 (91.15%)
CLPS1	30,683,298	94.05%	49.73%	28,896,011 (94.18%)	27,837,621 (90.73%)
CLPS2	33,420,602	94.43%	50.11%	31,682,117 (94.80%)	30,692,212 (91.84%)
CLPS3	31,530,842	94.47%	50.23%	29,882,067 (94.77%)	28,985,826 (91.93%)
PolyIC1	32,413,772	94.56%	50.62%	30,796,719 (95.01%)	29,890,039 (92.21%)
PolyIC2	26,512,197	94.6%	51.07%	24,992,758 (94.27%)	24,153,693 (91.10%)
PolyIC3	36,393,528	94.18%	50.92%	34,436,214 (94.62%)	33,286,709 (91.46%)
CPolyIC1	30,683,298	94.05%	49.73%	29,116,185 (94.86%)	28,272,727 (92.12%)
CPolyIC2	33,420,602	94.43%	50.11%	27,466,988 (94.85%)	26,540,968 (91.65%)
CPolyIC3	31,530,842	94.47%	50.23%	27,094,064 (95.05%)	26,144,517 (91.71%)

Notes.