Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 22;182(6):2607–2614. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04937-x

Table 2.

Netchine–Harbison (NHS) criteria and genetic analysis performed in 6 patients with clinical diagnosis of SRS

Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6
NHS criteria (yes/no):
  SGA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
  Postnatal growth retardation Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
  Relative macrocephaly at birth No Yes No No No Yes
  Protruding forehead Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
  Feeding difficulties and/or BMI ≤ −2 SDS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
  Body asymmetry No No No No No No
Genetic analysis (performed yes/no):
  Molecular testing 11p15 and UPD(7)mat Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
  Chromosome microarray analysis Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
  Multilocus methylation and CNV analysisa Yes Yes No Yes No Yes
  NGS short stature-related genesb Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Face2Gene result:
  Age at enrollment (years) 3 14.4 9.6 6.8 13.3 2.8
  Position SRS diagnosisc 7 2 1 No top 10 No top 10 1
  Gestalt level Low Low Low - - Medium

SGA small for gestational age

aMethylation and CNV analysis of chromosome 6, 7, 11, 14, 15, 19, and 20

bNext-generation sequencing of 18 short stature-related genes including HMGA2

cFace2Gene ranks a list of syndromes from the most to the least likely for each picture analyzed. The numbers in the table indicate the position of SRS in this list. For each syndrome, the gestalt similarity with suggested syndromes is estimated and divided into three different levels of probability (low, medium, and high)