Table 2.
Studies about laser evoked potentials (LEPs) in fibromyalgia (FM) and healthy controls (HC) published within the last 5 years. In bracket, disease duration in years is reported, when available
Authors | Methods | Subjects | Results | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
De Tommaso et al. (2017) | CO2 laser stimulation | 50 FM (7.2 ± 6.21 y) and 30 HC | Reduced habituation of vertex LEPs | Finding supporting abnormal central elaboration of pain |
Fasolino et al. (2020) | Nd:YAP laser stimulation | 57 FM (7 ± 8.5 y) | Normal LEP parameters in patients with and without small-fiber pathology | Finding suggesting that small-fiber pathology has a negligible impact on somatosensory system function in fibromyalgia |
Van Assche et al. (2020) | CO2 laser stimulation | 92 FM 39 HC | Normal LEP parameters | Finding suggesting that small-fiber neuropathy is not a significant contributor to the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia |
Vecchio et al. (2020) | CO2 laser stimulation | 81 FM (10.69 ± 8.16 y) | Abnormal habituation index and correlation with reduced IENFD at the thigh | Finding suggesting central impairment of pain processing and association with mild proximal small-fiber pathology |
Vecchio et al. (2022) | CO2 laser stimulation | 37 FM (10.27 ± 7.17 y) (22 patients with proximal denervation, 18 with normal skin biopsy, and 7 with proximal and distal IENFD reduction |
Reduced amplitude of the P2 component, not coherent with the site of denervation Decreased habituation of P2 prevailing in patients with reduced IENFD |
Finding suggesting that LEP abnormalities are not the expression of small-fiber impairment in fibromyalgia |
Sympathetic skin response — SSR — and autonomic assessment (heart rate variability-HRV)