Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 10;7:57. doi: 10.1038/s41698-023-00406-8

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

TNM stage
Characteristica All cases (N = 815) Stage II (N = 453) Stage III (N = 362) P valueb
Sex 0.036
 Female (NHS) 502 (62%) 294 (65%) 208 (57%)
 Male (HPFS) 313 (38%) 159 (35%) 154 (43%)
Mean age ± SD (years) 68.6 ± 8.9 68.9 ± 8.7 68.1 ± 9.1 0.22
Family history of colorectal cancer in any first-degree relative 0.73
 No 660 (81%) 365 (81%) 295 (82%)
 Yes 152 (19%) 87 (19%) 65 (18%)
Pack-years of smoking at diagnosis 0.24
 0 328 (42%) 174 (40%) 154 (44%)
 1–19 178 (23%) 94 (22%) 84 (24%)
 20–39 137 (18%) 80 (18%) 57 (16%)
 ≥40 137 (18%) 85 (20%) 52 (15%)
Tumor location 0.23
 Cecum 136 (17%) 76 (17%) 60 (17%)
 Ascending to transverse colon 288 (36%) 173 (38%) 115 (32%)
 Descending to sigmoid colon 277 (34%) 146 (32%) 131 (36%)
 Rectum 108 (13%) 55 (12%) 53 (15%)
Tumor differentiation 0.077
 Well to moderate 709 (87%) 403 (89%) 306 (85%)
 Poor 106 (13%) 50 (11%) 56 (15%)
Tumor depth of invasion (pT stage) <0.0001
 pT1 13 (2%) 0 (0%) 13 (4%)
 pT2 45 (5%) 0 (0 %) 47 (13%)
 pT3 704 (87%) 423 (93%) 281 (78%)
 pT4 49 (6%) 30 (7%) 19 (5%)
Positive lymph node count <0.0001
 0 (pN0) 416 (56%) 416 (100%) 0 (0%)
 1–3 (pN1) 228 (30%) 0 (0%) 228 (69%)
 ≥4 (pN2) 103 (14%) 0 (0%) 103 (31%)
Negative lymph node count <0.0001
 0–5 144 (21%) 55 (15%) 89 (28%)
 6–11 243 (35%) 125 (34%) 118 (37%)
 12–17 137 (20%) 77 (21%) 60 (19%)
 ≥18 170 (24%) 114 (31%) 56 (17%)
Extent of extraglandular necrosis 0.29
 0% 509 (62%) 285 (63%) 224 (62%)
 1–19% 167 (20%) 85 (19%) 82 (23%)
 ≥20% 139 (17%) 83 (18%) 56 (15%)
Lymphovascular invasion 0.003
 None 538 (90%) 320 (94%) 218 (86%)
 Mild 35 (6%) 13 (4%) 22 (9%)
 Moderate/extensive 21 (4%) 7 (2%) 14 (6%)
Perineural invasion 0.009
 None 575 (98%) 333 (99%) 242 (96%)
 Mild 8 (1%) 3 (0.9%) 5 (2%)
 Moderate/extensive 5 (0.9%) 0 (0%) 5 (2%)
Extracellular mucinous component 0.004
 0% 448 (57%) 232 (53%) 216 (62%)
 1–49% 193 (25%) 107 (25%) 86 (25%)
 ≥50% 143 (18%) 97 (22%) 46 (13%)
Signet ring cell component 0.24
 0% 677 (87%) 383 (88%) 294 (84%)
 1–9% 75 (10%) 35 (8%) 40 (11%)
 ≥10% 29 (4%) 15 (3%) 14 (4%)
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) 0.003
 Absent/minimal 558 (72%) 294 (68%) 264 (76%)
 Mild 123 (16%) 69 (16%) 54 (16%)
 Moderate/severe 96 (12%) 68 (16%) 28 (8%)
MSI status <0.0001
 Non-MSI-high 556 (80%) 279 (73%) 277 (88%)
 MSI-high 143 (20%) 104 (27%) 39 (12%)
CIMP status 0.0004
 Low/negative 520 (75%) 268 (70%) 252 (82%)
 High 174 (25%) 117 (30%) 57 (18%)
Mean LINE-1 methylation level ± SD (%) 63.7 ± 10.2 64.3 ± 10.0 62.9 ± 10.3 0.069
KRAS mutation 0.10
 Wild-type 390 (58%) 224 (61%) 166 (55%)
 Mutant 278 (42%) 141 (39%) 137 (45%)
BRAF mutation 0.15
 Wild-type 584 (83%) 314 (81%) 270 (85%)
 Mutant 122 (17%) 75 (19%) 47 (15%)
PIK3CA mutation 0.38
 Wild-type 550 (84%) 293 (83%) 257 (85%)
 Mutant 106 (16%) 62 (17%) 44 (15%)
Memory cytotoxic T-cell (CD3+CD8+CD45RO+ cell) densityc 0.014
 Q0 (0, lowest) 244 (48%) 115 (42%) 139 (56%)
 Q1 88 (17%) 56 (20%) 32 (14%)
 Q2 88 (17%) 53 (19%) 35 (15%)
 Q3 (highest) 88 (17%) 53 (19%) 35 (15%)
Memory helper T-cell (CD3+CD4+CD45RO+ cell) densityc 0.51
 Q0 (0, lowest) 176 (34%) 89 (32%) 87 (37%)
 Q1 111 (22%) 64 (23%) 47 (20%)
 Q2 111 (22%) 65 (23%) 46 (20%)
 Q3 (highest) 110 (22%) 59 (21%) 51 (22%)
Fusobacterium nucleatum in tumor 0.34
 Negative 572 (85%) 309 (83%) 263 (86%)
 Positive 104 (15%) 62 (17%) 42 (14%)
Bifidobacterium species in tumor 0.46
 Negative 485 (70%) 269 (71%) 216 (68%)
 Positive 211 (30%) 110 (29%) 101 (32%)
Five-year colorectal cancer-specific survival status <0.0001
 Survival 661 (81%) 392 (87%) 269 (74%)
 Death 154 (19%) 61 (13%) 93 (26%)

AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, CIMP CpG island methylator phenotype, HPFS Health Professionals Follow-up Study, LINE-1 long-interspersed nucleotide element-1, MSI microsatellite instability, NHS Nurses’ Health Study, SD standard deviation, TNM tumor-node-metastasis.

aPercentage indicates the proportion of patients with a specific clinical, pathologic, or molecular characteristic among all patients or in strata of the stage, excluding missing data.

bTo compare categorical data between stages, the Chi-square test was performed. To compare continuous variables, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for variables exhibiting normality. For variables that did not follow a normal distribution, values were separated into ordinal categories prior to the Chi-square test. For lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion, Fisher’s exact tests were performed.

cTumor tissue CD3+CD8+CD45RO+ and CD3+CD4+CD45RO+ cell density measures (cells/mm2) were categorized into 0 value (the lowest category, Q0) and positive values divided equally into tertiles (Q1 to Q3).

Clinical, pathologic, molecular, and immune characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer according to AJCC TNM staging.