TABLE 3.
Mediation analysis.
| Variable | B | β (95% CI) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Family support on mediators | |||
| Saving attitudes | 0.189 | .391 (0.321–0.461) | <.001 |
| Caregiver support | 0.035 | .154 (0.069–0.239) | <.001 |
| Having savings | −0.046 | −.109 (−0.180–−0.039) | .002 |
| Enrolled in school | −0.002 | −.012 (−0.087–0.063) | .751 |
| Food security | −0.001 | −.016 (−0.077–0.045) | .608 |
| Communication with the guardian | 0.197 | .351 (0.271–0.431) | <.001 |
| Mediators on ART adherence | |||
| Saving attitudes | 0.023 | .148 (0.022–0.275) | .021 |
| Caregiver support | −0.002 | −.006 (−0.140–0.128) | .925 |
| Having savings | −0.002 | −.009 (−0.119–0.101) | .872 |
| Enrolled in school | 0.022 | .053 (−0.010–0.117) | .099 |
| Food security | 0.095 | .071 (−0.013–0.156) | .098 |
| Communication with the guardian | 0.021 | .159 (0.047–0.271) | .005 |
| Specific indirect effects | |||
| Saving attitudes | 0.004 | .058 (0.008–0.108) | .024 |
| Caregiver support | <0.001 | −.001 (−0.022–0.020) | .925 |
| Having savings | <0.001 | .001 (−0.011–0.013) | .873 |
| Enrolled in school | <0.001 | −.001 (−0.005–0.003) | .755 |
| Food security | <0.001 | −.001 (−0.006–0.004) | .653 |
| Communication with the guardian | 0.004 | .056 (0.012–0.100) | .013 |
| Effects | |||
| Direct effect | 0.003 | .034 (−0.093–0.160) | .602 |
| Total indirect effect | 0.008 | .112 (0.052–0.173) | <.001 |
| Total effect | 0.011 | .146 (0.032–0.259) | .012 |
| Effect mediated | 76.7% | ||
| Model fitness | |||
| R2 | β = .072, p = .016 | ||
| χ2 | χ2 (81) = 131.6, p <.001 | ||
| CFI | 0.939 | ||
| RMSEA | 0.032 | ||
| SRMR | 0.037 | ||
Note: Bold values represent statistically significant associations.
Abbreviations: CFI, Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual.