Table 3.
Comparison of proposed approach with existing Methods
Dataset | Methods | Recall | Precision | F1-Score | Accuracy | EER |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PolyU | MINDTCT | 30.70 | 24.80 | 26.90 | 45.49 | 36.43 |
Contactless Net | 70.40 | 60.10 | 64.40 | 95.66 | 4.84 | |
Child-CLEF Net | 97.30 | 98.60 | 98.00 | 96.10 | 3.95 | |
CLCF | MINDTCT | 49.70 | 28.10 | 43.30 | 27.69 | 51.33 |
Child-CLEF Net (Index Finger) | 94.70 | 100 | 97.20 | 95.00 | 5.20 | |
Child-CLEF Net | 98.40 | 100 | 99.20 | 98.46 | 1.99 |
Bold values indicate better results of our proposed work than the other methods