Skip to main content
. 2023 May 29;13:1182479. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1182479

Table 4.

Relationship between adipose tissue (AT) distribution and survival.

Relationship between AT distribution and Survival Patients (n) Patient group Fat distribution parameter Outcome p-value
Mauland 227 All patients VAV% ≥ 37% Reduced OS (#) 0.005
Donkers 176 All patients VAV% > 34% Reduced OS ($) 0.006
Non-endometrioid Reduced OS & DSS (#) 0.026
Celik 186 All patients VAT index > 0.265 Reduced DSS ($) 0.029
Wada 145 Endometrioid V/S ratio (> 0.5) Reduced OS ($) 0.005
Reduced PFS ($) 0.008
Nattenmuller 54 All patients Any No effect on OS ($) NS

#, multivariable analyses; $, univariable analyses; VAV%, visceral fat percentage; VAT index, visceral adipose tissue index; V/S ratio, visceral/subcutaneous index; OS, overall survival; DSS, disease-specific survival; PFS, progression-free survival; NS, not significant.

Bold values are statistical significant values.