Table 3.
Summary of tools used for outcomes in domain of activity and participation
| AMPS | CAPE | COPM | CSAPPA | ETCH-M | GAS | PEGS | PEM-CY | PQRS | SSRS | TOGSS | VABS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miller et al (2001)29 | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Ward and Rodger (2004)57 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Chan et al (2007)58 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Rodger et al (2007)59 | ||||||||||||
| Taylor et al (2007)60 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Green et al (2008)*,61 | ||||||||||||
| Rodger et al (2008)62 | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Phelan et al (2009)68 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Rodger and Brandenburg (2009)63 | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Czmowski et al (2014)64 | + | ± | ||||||||||
| Gharebaghy et al (2015)*,65 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Zwicker et al (2015)66 | = | + | = | = | ||||||||
| Capistran et al (2016)*,67 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Thornton et al (2016)69 | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Karunakaran (2017)*,70 | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Anderson et al (2018)71 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Johnson (2018)72 | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Araùjo et al (2019)73 | + | + | ||||||||||
| Araùjo et al (2021)*,74 | + | = | + | |||||||||
| Izadi-Najafabadi et al (2021)*,75 | + | + |
Note. Abbreviations: “+”, improvement; “-”, degradation; “±”, mixed result; “=”, stable result; AMPS, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills; CAPE, Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment; COPM, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; CSAPPA, Children's Self-Perceptions and Adequacy in Predilection for Physical Activity; ETCH-M, Evaluation Tool for Children's Handwriting; GAS, goal attainment scaling; PEGS, Perceived Efficacy and Goal Setting System; PEM-CY, Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth; PQRS, Performance Quality Rating Scale; SSRS, Social Skills Rating Scale; TOGSS, Test Of Grocery Shopping Skills; VABS, Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales.
Studies with effect sizes.